<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hip Shot: &#8216;May 39th/40th&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Capital Fringe Festival 2011</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:27:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Fringe Fest 2009: Our Comprehensive Rundown - Fringe &#38; Purge - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/comment-page-1/#comment-24233</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Fringe Fest 2009: Our Comprehensive Rundown - Fringe &#38; Purge - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/?p=773#comment-24233</guid>
		<description>[...] May 39th/40th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 39th/40th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mammal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/comment-page-1/#comment-24110</link>
		<dc:creator>mammal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/?p=773#comment-24110</guid>
		<description>I got way more enjoyment out of May 39 than the reviewer seems to have -- it did have moments of &quot;cute&quot; (for some values of cute), but moved cleverly into &quot;creepy,&quot; then turned disturbingly wistful.  My sympathies were played with very effectively.

The acting was very good, both vocally and with body language.  The set was effectively spare and evocative -- most of the clutter was a satisfying mix of familiar and mysterious.  (The silver-painted styrofoam constructions looked a little tooky from the front row, though.)  The pre-show and intermission recordings were a very nice touch.  

I didn&#039;t enjoy 40 as much, and I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s because the actors were still coping with the change-up, or that the writing didn&#039;t seem as polished to me.  It seemed a lot more ambiguous to me, in many ways -- not all of them good.  The physical constraints of being on a table may have hampered &quot;Jim&#039;s&quot; expressiveness, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got way more enjoyment out of May 39 than the reviewer seems to have &#8212; it did have moments of &#8220;cute&#8221; (for some values of cute), but moved cleverly into &#8220;creepy,&#8221; then turned disturbingly wistful.  My sympathies were played with very effectively.</p>
<p>The acting was very good, both vocally and with body language.  The set was effectively spare and evocative &#8212; most of the clutter was a satisfying mix of familiar and mysterious.  (The silver-painted styrofoam constructions looked a little tooky from the front row, though.)  The pre-show and intermission recordings were a very nice touch.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t enjoy 40 as much, and I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s because the actors were still coping with the change-up, or that the writing didn&#8217;t seem as polished to me.  It seemed a lot more ambiguous to me, in many ways &#8212; not all of them good.  The physical constraints of being on a table may have hampered &#8220;Jim&#8217;s&#8221; expressiveness, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: callie kimball</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/comment-page-1/#comment-24101</link>
		<dc:creator>callie kimball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/?p=773#comment-24101</guid>
		<description>Yes, we did switch the genders two weeks before opening. 

Thanks for coming to the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we did switch the genders two weeks before opening. </p>
<p>Thanks for coming to the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Wiener</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/comment-page-1/#comment-24073</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/?p=773#comment-24073</guid>
		<description>I agree, Trey, that 39 was tighter than 40, and the show might have managed to dodge the badge of triteness had 39 been allowed to stand on its own. I imagine that the performances will only improve over the coming two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Trey, that 39 was tighter than 40, and the show might have managed to dodge the badge of triteness had 39 been allowed to stand on its own. I imagine that the performances will only improve over the coming two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/2009/07/12/hip-shot-may-39th40th/comment-page-1/#comment-24050</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/fringe/?p=773#comment-24050</guid>
		<description>Good catch, Aaron: I heard (from the playwright and from one of the actors) that just last week, the author flipped the roles in the second half. Literally: &quot;You know those lines that used to be hers? Now they&#039;re his.&quot;

So yeah, May 40th still seems much more like a work in progress. I like the first play better than you did, though. 

(Full disclosure: Callie Kimball and I are on friendly, coffee-having terms, and the guy who plays Sam/Jim works a day job with my other half.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch, Aaron: I heard (from the playwright and from one of the actors) that just last week, the author flipped the roles in the second half. Literally: &#8220;You know those lines that used to be hers? Now they&#8217;re his.&#8221;</p>
<p>So yeah, May 40th still seems much more like a work in progress. I like the first play better than you did, though. </p>
<p>(Full disclosure: Callie Kimball and I are on friendly, coffee-having terms, and the guy who plays Sam/Jim works a day job with my other half.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

