<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; weddings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/weddings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Couples: Prepare to Get Hitched!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/26/gay-couples-prepare-to-get-hitched/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/26/gay-couples-prepare-to-get-hitched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike DeBonis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weddings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=48593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Earlier today, the D.C. Court of Appeals declined to stay the impending legalization of same-sex marriages in Washington.
In a terse opinion [PDF] today, the appeals court refused to overturn a Superior Court judge's decision not to postpone the District's same-sex marriage from going into effect. Which means, barring some unlikely congressional intervention, come next Wednesday, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3274/2626730909_f02b9cf8a3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Earlier today, the D.C. Court of Appeals declined to stay the impending legalization of same-sex marriages in Washington.</p>
<p>In a <a href='http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/02/usca-order-granting-summary-affirmance-2-26-10.pdf'>terse opinion</a> [PDF] today, the appeals court refused to overturn a Superior Court judge's decision not to postpone the District's same-sex marriage from going into effect. Which means, barring some unlikely congressional intervention, come next Wednesday, March 3, gay couples can start lining up at the courthouse. (Pursuant to District law, they''ll have to wait three business days to actually do the deed, so no weddings till Tuesday.)</p>
<p>Over at the Sexist, <strong>Amanda Hess</strong> has <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/26/gay-and-getting-married-nextxt-week-bring-35-work-the-security-line-and-avoid-fred-phelps/">everything you need to know</a> about tying the knot, starting with your trip to the H. Carl Moultrie I District of Columbia Courthouse. You'll need to bring $35 and avoid <strong>Fred Phelps</strong> &#038; Co.</p>
<p>UPDATE, 5:15 P.M.: Download your <a href="http://www.dccourts.gov/dccourts/docs/family/marriage_license.pdf">new, gender-neutral marriage license application form</a> [PDF] if you want (via <a href="http://www.glaaforum.org/glaa_forum/2010/02/dc-superior-court-revises-marriage-application-to-refer-to-spouses.html">GLAA Forum</a>).</p>
<p><em>Photo via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nerdcoregirl/2626730909/">nerdcoregirl</a>, Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/26/gay-couples-prepare-to-get-hitched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Don&#8217;t Care That You Recently Got Married</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/28/i-dont-care-that-you-recently-got-married/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/28/i-dont-care-that-you-recently-got-married/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weddings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why, hello there, person who attended my high school. Thank you for requesting to reconnect with me via a social networking Website. It appears that you've recently become someone's wife.
At first I wasn't so sure that you had recently gotten married. But then I noticed that you had changed your last name to a completely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why, hello there, person who attended my high school. Thank you for requesting to reconnect with me via a <a href="http://www.thefacebook.com">social networking Website</a>. It appears that you've recently become someone's wife.</p>
<p>At first I wasn't so sure that you had recently gotten married. But then I noticed that you had changed your last name to a completely different last name. "Hmm," I thought. "That's weird." A quick perusal of your photo gallery didn't help clear up the matter. Why do you appear to be leaning against an abandoned but polished vintage car at the edge of a wooded marsh, your left hand posed strangely in the air, as some dude stares intently into your face? And to think: In all that time that you were sitting three or more rows behind me in Freshman Biology, you never once mentioned your interest in doubles rustic portraiture.</p>
<p>But then I saw that series of photographs of you swathed in a huge, flowing, white satin dress, some dude staring intently into your face. At that point, I was sooooo on to you!</p>
<p>Your autobiographical section only helped heighten my suspicion that you had recently gotten married:</p>
<blockquote><p>Website: http://www.[some dude]and[girl who sat three or more rows behind me in Freshman Biology]swedding.com</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Interests: Enjoying my wonderful husband!, Trying to talk [some dude] into my design ideas for our home.</p></blockquote>
<p>I must admit that I became a bit confused when I reached the "Favorites Book" section, where you include "Anything by bell hooks and Gloria Steinem." Hmm. Anything?</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing it all up:</p>
<blockquote><p>Relationship Status: Married.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don't Care,</p>
<p>Amanda Hess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/28/i-dont-care-that-you-recently-got-married/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

