<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/u-s-court-of-appeals-for-the-district-of-columbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trinidad Checkpoints Still Illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/15/trinidad-checkpoints-still-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/15/trinidad-checkpoints-still-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cathy Lanier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkpoints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Nickles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinidad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia refused to hear the District's appeal on the legality of  D.C. police checkpoints. On July 10, a unanimous three-judge panel of that court ruled that the police checkpoints&#8212;which started in Trinidad&#8212;were unconstitutional.
The District's only recourse at this point is to take its case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia <a href=" http://www.justiceonline.org/site/DocServer/mills-checkpoints-en-bank-petition-denied.pdf?docID=1301&amp;autologin=true">refused to hear the District's appeal</a> on the legality of  D.C. police checkpoints. On July 10, a unanimous <a href=" http://www.justiceonline.org/site/R?i=nsR4txWyOlSwiIKeX7EtuQ..">three-judge panel of that court ruled</a> that the police checkpoints&#8212;which started in Trinidad&#8212;were unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The District's only recourse at this point is to take its case to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>AG <strong>Peter Nickles</strong> tells <strong>City Desk</strong>: "I'm disappointed. We'll look at our options including a Supreme Court request....The D.C. Circuit has spoken and we'll take it from there."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/15/trinidad-checkpoints-still-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

