<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; the reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/the-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Picks (No Surprises Here)</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frozen river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in bruges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mickey rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curious case of benjamin button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wrestler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viola davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall*e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=16963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm always excited about the Academy Awards &#8212; yeah, there are still a few of us left out there &#8212; but I'm guessing there won't be a whole lot of thrilling and/or shocking moments this year. (Most any upset would go thusly: Oooh, the frontrunner didn't win! Which means...someone or -thing completely undeserving did.)
But for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm always excited about the <strong>Academy Awards</strong> &#8212; yeah, there are still a few of us left out there &#8212; but I'm guessing there won't be a whole lot of thrilling and/or shocking moments this year. (Most any upset would go thusly: <em>Oooh, the frontrunner didn't win! Which means...someone or -thing completely undeserving did.</em>)</p>
<p>But for the record, here are my predictions anyway. And tune in at 8:30 when, give or take some DVR-shifting, I'll be live-blogging the entire ceremony. Or at least for as long as my cold medicine holds out.</p>
<p><strong>BEST PICTURE</strong><br />
<em>WALL*E</em>. Not nominated? <em>The Dark Knight</em>. Sigh! How about <em>The Wrestler?</em> OK, I'll stop. It's gonna be <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, though between the five that were chosen I loved <em>Milk</em> the most.</p>
<p><span id="more-16963"></span><br />
<strong><br />
BEST ACTOR</strong><br />
I'd love to see <strong>Mickey Rourke</strong> get this, but <strong>Sean Penn</strong>'s performance as Harvey Milk was so completely transformative, it's gotta be recognized.<br />
<strong><br />
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR</strong><br />
Please. (In this usage, "please" is defined as "<strong>Heath Ledger</strong>.")<br />
<strong><br />
BEST ACTRESS</strong><br />
I'm going with <strong>Kate Winslet</strong>, though her speech better include shout-outs to the makeup crew and her nipples for help making her turn remotely remarkable in <em>The Reader</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS</strong><br />
<strong>Penelope Cruz</strong> has the buzz, but c'mon, she could be passionate and sensuous in her sleep. Would be nice if D.C. native <strong>Taraji P. Henson</strong> got it, but my guess is <strong>Viola Davis</strong> for her brief role in <em>Doubt</em>. The Academy loves those incisive knock-outs.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DIRECTOR</strong><br />
I'm torn. My gut says it'll go to <strong>Danny Boyle</strong> in a <em>Slumdog</em> lovefest. But I wouldn't be surprised if <strong>David Fincher</strong> won for his technically proficient handling of <em>Benjamin Button</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
<em>WALL*E</em> would be a nice upset, and <em>Frozen River</em> and <em>In Bruges </em>were great stories. but I'm thinking this is where <em>Milk</em> will get its love.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM</strong><br />
Please. (In this usage, "please" is defined as "<strong>WALL*E</strong>.")<br />
<strong><br />
BEST ART DIRECTION</strong> and <strong>CINEMATOGRAPHY</strong><br />
Both to <em>The Dark Knight</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST COSTUME DESIGN</strong><br />
Period pieces = Oscar. <em>The Duchess</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DOCUMENTARY</strong><br />
<em>Man on Wire</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT</strong><br />
Total blind guess, but I'm going with <em>The Witness &#8211; From the Balcony of Room 306</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FILM EDITING</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN FILM</strong><br />
I've only seen two of the nominees, but I can't imagine a doc more imaginative and affecting than <em>Waltz With Bashir</em>.</p>
<p><strong>ACHIEVEMENT IN MAKEUP</strong><br />
<em>Ben Button</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ORIGINAL SCORE</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SONG</strong><br />
The popular opinion is that the two <em>Slumdog</em> noms will split the vote. But really, have you heard anything more catchy in a movie this year than <em>Jai Ho</em>? Sorry, <strong>Peter Gabriel</strong>, but <em>Down to Earth</em> is kind of a snooze.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED SHORT</strong><br />
<em>Presto </em>was adorable, the Academy doesn't really do adorable. Going with <em>La Maison en Petits Cubes.</em></p>
<p><strong>BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT</strong><br />
No idea, but <em>Auf der Strecke</em> seems to be getting the praise.<br />
<strong><br />
BEST SOUND EDITING</strong> and <strong>BEST SOUND MIXING</strong><br />
Considering it's nearly dialogue-free yet still the most engaging film of last year, <em>WALL*E</em>'s gotta win both.</p>
<p><strong>BEST VISUAL EFFECTS</strong><br />
<em>Benjamin Button</em>, because if you're honest about it, the film's strongest characteristic is its looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMC Best Picture Showcase</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/11/amc-best-picture-showcase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/11/amc-best-picture-showcase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frost/nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curious case of benjamin button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=15807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know it's the same every year: You swear you're going to see all the Academy Award-nominated films before the big day. You put the chosen ones on your to-do list as soon as awards season kicks off. You've got plenty of time!
Then suddenly it's Oscar night, and you're left shrugging at all the opening-monologue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it's the same every year: You swear you're going to see all the Academy Award-nominated films before the big day. You put the chosen ones on your to-do list as soon as awards season kicks off. You've got plenty of time!</p>
<p>Then suddenly it's Oscar night, and you're left shrugging at all the opening-monologue jokes because you chose to spend your weekends with <strong>Paul Blart</strong> and warring brides instead of watching <strong>Brad Pitt</strong> age backward.</p>
<p>It doesn't have to happen again. <strong>AMC Entertainment</strong> is offering its annual Best Picture crash-course on Sat., Feb. 21, a five-film marathon that for $30 grants you a daylong pass, a "souvenir lanyard," and a bottomless bucket o' popcorn.</p>
<p>So slack all you want if you really feel up to catching all the Academy's good-but-not-great anointed ones in a single sitting. (Apologies to <em>Milk</em> and <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, in my opinion the only films that deserve such accolades.)</p>
<p>The schedule below is the same for every theater, which this year includes Loews Georgetown 14, AMC Hoffman Center 22, AMC Potomac Mills 18, Loews Rio Cinemas 18, AMC Owings Mills 17, and AMC Tyson's Corner 16. Advance tickets can be purchased at <a href="www.amctheatres.com ">AMC Theatres</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Milk</strong></em><br />
10:30 a.m.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Reader</strong></em><br />
1:05 p.m.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</strong></em><br />
3:45 p.m.</p>
<p><em><strong>Slumdog Millionaire </strong></em><br />
7:15 p.m.<br />
<em><br />
<strong>Frost/Nixon </strong></em><br />
9:45 p.m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/11/amc-best-picture-showcase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas Openings: The Wrestler, Gran Torino, Marley &amp; Me, the List Goes On&#8230;and On</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/25/christmas-openings-the-wrestler-gran-torino-marley-me-the-list-goes-onand-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/25/christmas-openings-the-wrestler-gran-torino-marley-me-the-list-goes-onand-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedtime stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gran torino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marley & me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curious case of benjamin button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wrestler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valkyrie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=12741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've still got rum balls to roll, people. So let's make this run-down of the week's openings quick, using an easy-to-understand grading system that's both familiar and festive:
The Wrestler: NICE
Gran Torino: NICE
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button: NOT AS NICE AS IT THINKS IT IS
Marley &#38; Me: NAUGHTY
Bedtime Stories: REALLY NAUGHTY
The Reader: BORDERLINE, BUT I'M [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've still got rum balls to roll, people. So let's make this run-down of the week's openings quick, using an easy-to-understand grading system that's both familiar <em>and</em> festive:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36636"><em><strong>The Wrestler</strong></em></a>: NICE<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36636"><em><strong>Gran Torino</strong></em></a>: NICE<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36638"><em><strong>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</strong></em></a>: NOT AS NICE AS IT THINKS IT IS<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/marley_and_me/"><em><strong>Marley &amp; Me</strong></em></a>: NAUGHTY<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bedtime_stories/"><em><strong>Bedtime Stories</strong></em></a>: REALLY NAUGHTY<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10009498-reader/"><em><strong>The Reader</strong></em></a>: BORDERLINE, BUT I'M VOTING NAUGHTY<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_spirit/"><em><strong>The Spirit</strong></em></a>: PRETTY BUT NAUGHTY<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/valkyrie/"><em><strong>Valkyrie</strong></em></a>: WHO CARES</p>
<p>Look for reviews of <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36636"><em>The Wrestler</em></a>, <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36636"><em>Gran Torino</em></a>, and <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36638"><em>Benjamin Button</em></a> on this site soon, if not already &#8212; there's a good chance that, through the magic of the Internet, I'll still be sleeping when this posts.</p>
<p>Ho ho ho, etc.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/25/christmas-openings-the-wrestler-gran-torino-marley-me-the-list-goes-onand-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reader&#8216;s Kate Winslet on the Holocaust: &#8220;We Get It, It Was Grim. Move On.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/24/the-readers-kate-winslet-on-the-holocaust-we-get-it-it-was-grim-move-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/24/the-readers-kate-winslet-on-the-holocaust-we-get-it-it-was-grim-move-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricky gervais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=12723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so that quote is actually from Extras' Kate Winslet, when her character is giving a Tropic Thunder-esque speech on a surefire way to win an Academy Award. The full clip of her appearance on Ricky Gervais' show is here, with the Holocaust talk around the three-minute mark:

It was all I could think about while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so that quote is actually from <i>Extras'</i> <strong>Kate Winslet</strong>, when her character is giving a <i>Tropic Thunder</i>-esque speech on a surefire way to win an Academy Award. The full clip of her appearance on <strong>Ricky Gervais</strong>' show is here, with the Holocaust talk around the three-minute mark:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR2mBxumNe4"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/aR2mBxumNe4/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p>It was all I could think about while sitting through the first of Winslet's two holidays releases, <i>The Reader</i>. That, and her gigantic nipples. And the groceries I needed to pick up on the way home. It wasn't the most fascinating movie, despite the fact that all she does is bone a 15-year-old during half of it. Oscar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/24/the-readers-kate-winslet-on-the-holocaust-we-get-it-it-was-grim-move-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

