<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; Talking Points Memo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/talking-points-memo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Shafer Throws Maureen Dowd a Bone on Plagiarism</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/jack-shafer-throws-maureen-dowd-a-bone-on-plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/jack-shafer-throws-maureen-dowd-a-bone-on-plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Scheinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Shafer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maureen dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tpm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=22347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleague Mike Riggs has already noted a few wrinkles in the Maureen Dowd-Josh Marshall plagiarism incident.
Putting it bluntly, Riggs says: "Dowd stole some shit and admitted it." Fair enough.
In Slate, Jack Shafer has an uncharacteristically mellow view of the proceedings. After chiding, "Bad, Dowd, bad—deserving of hard time in a pillory!," Shafer proceeds to exonerate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-22348" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/05/defoe_in_the_pillory_opt.jpg" alt="" width="237" height="170" />Colleague<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/author/mriggs/"><strong> Mike Riggs</strong></a> has already noted a few wrinkles in the <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/this-just-in-maureen-dowd-can-do-whatever-the-fck-she-wants/"><strong>Maureen Dowd</strong>-<strong>Josh Marshall</strong> plagiarism incident</a>.</p>
<p>Putting it bluntly, Riggs says: "Dowd stole some shit and admitted it." Fair enough.</p>
<p>In <em>Slate</em>, <strong>Jack Shafer</strong> has an uncharacteristically mellow <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2218602/">view</a> of the proceedings. After chiding, "Bad, Dowd, bad—deserving of hard time in a pillory!," Shafer proceeds to exonerate the columnist—Dowd "almost sets things right," he says, a conclusion the media critic arrives at through six-point reasoning:</p>
<ol>
<li>She responded promptly to the charge of plagiarism when confronted by the Huffington Post and <em>Politico</em>. (Many plagiarists go into hiding or deny getting material from other sources.)</li>
<li>She and her paper quickly amended her column and published a correction (although the correction is a little soft for my taste).</li>
<li>Her explanation of how the plagiarism happened seems plausible—if a tad incomplete.</li>
<li>She's not yet used the explanation as an <em>excuse</em>, nor has she said it's "time to move on."</li>
<li>She's<strong> </strong>not<strong> </strong>yet<strong> </strong>protested that her lifting <em>wasn't</em> plagiarism.</li>
<li>She's taking her lumps and not whining about it.</li>
</ol>
<p>Taking these points one by one:</p>
<p><span id="more-22347"></span></p>
<p>1. Two of the most highly trafficked politics and commentary sites rub your nose in your own literary pilfering. What do you do: Retire to your <a href="http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/features/14946/">Georgetown manse</a> and burnish your <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/25423/">Pulitzer</a>, or acknowledge the obvious?</p>
<p>2. Could <em>Times</em> spokesperson <strong>Diane McNulty</strong> possibly have been squishier in her <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0509/NYT_defends_Dowd_in_TPM_flap.html">apologia</a>? McNulty writes: "There is no need to do anything further since there is no allegation, hint or anything else from Marshall that this was anything but an error." Does the <em>Times</em> really need Marshall to come knocking before they force Dowd to grovel?</p>
<p>3. OK.</p>
<p>4. This smacks of a <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Chris_Rock#Bring_the_Pain_.28HBO.2C_1996.29"><strong>Chris Rock</strong> sketch</a>. Regardless, Dowd deserves no props on this count.</p>
<p>5. Ditto, but OK.</p>
<p>6. Still got a job, check. Still got a column, check. Plenty of heavyweights coming to her defense, check. Them's some pretty meager lumps.</p>
<p>A major point that Shafer misses is the question of medium. When a book plagiarizes another book, or a <a href="http://gawker.com/news/new-york-times-book-review/in-the-nytbr-writers-are-now-plagiarizing-about-books-246924.php">print publication plagiarizes a book</a>, reaction is likely to come slowly and by narrow avenues. When one of the most-read columnists in the country cribs from one of the most-read bloggers in the country, well, that's a different story: backlash is likely to come quickly and from all sides. Leaving the cribber on the defensive, and with little equivocal recourse.</p>
<p>All of which sidesteps one of the most troubling points: How often has Dowd done this exact thing before?</p>
<p>A final point: Shafer apparently misunderstands the purpose of a pillory. <a href="http://www.geocities.com/eyre_crowe/defoe_in_the_pillory.jpg">Pillorying a writer</a> isn't the equivalent of slapping him or her on the wrist—it's a full-on public humiliation (see above), after which the writer's reputation is tarnished forever. Seditious pamphleteering, Papism, sexual deviancy—these were the crimes that merited a good pillorying back in the 17th and 18th centuries.</p>
<p>Far be it from me to recommend such for Dowd. But let's at least be consistent in our hyperbole.</p>
<p><small>Illustration above: "Defoe in the Pillory," engraving by J.C. Armytage, 1868.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/jack-shafer-throws-maureen-dowd-a-bone-on-plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Just In: Maureen Dowd Can Do Whatever the F*ck She Wants</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/this-just-in-maureen-dowd-can-do-whatever-the-fck-she-wants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/this-just-in-maureen-dowd-can-do-whatever-the-fck-she-wants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maureen dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Calderone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=22333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed it, Maureen Dowd flat-out plagiarized either a) Talking Points Memo's Josh Marshall or b) One of her friends, who quoted Josh Marshall in a phone call with Dowd. Either way, Dowd stole some shit and admitted it. Michael Calderone reports that it doesn't really matter. From NYT spokesperson Diane McNulty:

Maureen had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/17/maureen-dowd-admits-inadv_n_204418.html"><strong>Maureen Dowd</strong> flat-out plagiarized either</a> a) <strong>Talking Points Memo</strong>'s Josh Marshall or b) One of her friends, who quoted Josh Marshall in a phone call with Dowd. Either way, Dowd stole some shit and admitted it. <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0509/NYT_defends_Dowd_in_TPM_flap.html">Michael Calderone reports that it doesn't really matter</a>. From NYT spokesperson <strong>Diane McNulty</strong>:</p>
<p><span id="more-22333"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Maureen had us correct the column online as soon as the error was brought to her attention, adding in the sourcing to Marshall's blog. We ran a correction in today's paper,  referring readers to the correct version online.</p>
<p>There is no need to do anything further since there is no allegation, hint or anything else from Marshall that this was anything but an error. It was corrected. Journalists often use feeds from other staff journalists, free-lancers, stringers, a whole range of people. And from friends. Anyone with even the most passing acquaintance with Maureen's work knows that she is happy and eager to give people credit.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is complete bullshit: Dowd. Fucking. Plagiarized. But she's a Pulitzer winner, a media elite, and a total babe, so the NYT is looking the other way. (I bet Jayson Blair is seething right now! Rick Bragg&#8211;not so much.)</p>
<p>Calderone closes his piece with this bit of insight:</p>
<blockquote><p>If I was e-mailed a 40-plus-word block of text for this blog, and I used it, I'd include some sort of attribution &#8212; whether "a reader writes in," "media insider points out" or whatever the case may be.</p>
<p>But from The Times' response, it seems the paper finds it acceptable for columnists to take entire paragraphs from friends (or sources?), over the phone or e-mail, and reproduce them verbatim in the paper under the columnist's byline.</p></blockquote>
<p>Awesome, Calderone, you'd do differently. So would I. So would my colleagues and our freelancers and every other journalist who actually had to pay the consequences of handing in illegitimate copy. Now, can somebody suggest a good punishment for Dowd, a well-paid, respected columnist at a world-famous institution, who has demonstrated that she's too lazy to rework a friend's idea into her own words?</p>
<p>Perhaps a 500-word definition essay on integrity? Or maybe the same thing should happen to her that would happen to a first-year NYT reporter who stole from another journalist...</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2009/05/borrowed-wisdom-can-be-ok-borrowed-wordsnever.html">Eric Zorn says what I can't</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/18/this-just-in-maureen-dowd-can-do-whatever-the-fck-she-wants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Morning Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/our-morning-roundup-151/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/our-morning-roundup-151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morning roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrow Montgomery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire & EMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Cropp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palisades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington City Paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* Miss the debate? Don't head to the live blogs: Head to the live blog of the live blogs.
* G.W. student blog The Colonialist has a couple photos of Dick Cheney being released from G.W. Hospital. He waves.
* Dear China: Wish we could give you some advice on this whole fledgling democracy thing. Regrets, The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3007/2944344733_05d966e998.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>* Miss the debate? Don't head to the live blogs: Head to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/debate-live-blog-barack-john-and-the-live-bloggers-who-love-them/">the live blog of the live blogs</a>.</p>
<p>* G.W. student blog <strong>The Colonialist </strong>has <a href="http://www.thecolonialist.com/2008/10/cheney-released-from-gw-hospital/">a couple photos of <strong>Dick Cheney</strong></a> being released from G.W. Hospital. He waves.</p>
<p>* Dear <strong>China</strong>: Wish we could give you some advice on this whole <a href="http://polymeme.com/node/66900">fledgling democracy</a> thing. Regrets, The United States of America. [via <strong>Polymeme</strong>]</p>
<p>* Via <strong>Talking Points Memo</strong>: Ayers, Shmayers; even those people who believe <strong>Barack Obama</strong> is a terrorist are <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/voting_for_obama_even_if_you_b.php">still voting for him</a>. Says one Obama supporter:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Well, I don't know much about this terrorist group Barack used to be in with that Weather guy but I'm sick of paying for health insurance at work and that's why I'm supporting Barack."</p></blockquote>
<p>And in this newspaper:</p>
<blockquote><p>- Photographer <strong>Darrow Montgomery</strong> and Senior Writer <strong>Jason Cherkis </strong>document the end of a <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36346">Columbia Heights relic</a> and ask: Does anybody care?</p>
<p>- Your <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36339">Reel Affirmations film fest guide</a>.</p>
<p>- In <em>Cheap Seats</em>, <strong>Dave McKenna</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36350">talks race and Redskins</a>. What's black and white and reluctant to integrate all over?<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>- In <em>Loose Lips</em>, <strong>Mike DeBonis</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36351">does <strong>Peter Nickles </strong>does <strong>Alberto Gonzales</strong></a>.</p>
<p>- and <em>The Sexist </em>launches its <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/">Manliest Workplace in D.C.</a> tournament!</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Photo by <strong>Jason Mogavero</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/our-morning-roundup-151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

