<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; sidewalks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/sidewalks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Loving/Hating Sidewalks in Palisades</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/11/neighborhood-watch-lovinghating-sidewalks-in-palisades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/11/neighborhood-watch-lovinghating-sidewalks-in-palisades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Niedowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palisades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC department of transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Cheh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university terrace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: The city announced plans to construct sidewalks on the east side of University Terrace in Palisades as part of a reconstruction project, prompting immediate pushback from some residents who thought they'd make the neighborhood feel more "urban." Who knew four-foot-wide strips of pavement could be so controversial?
Don't Build Them: Residents of more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-32109" title="924812_walkway" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/09/924812_walkway.jpg" alt="924812_walkway" width="176" height="264" />The Issue</strong>: The city announced plans to construct sidewalks on the east side of University Terrace in Palisades as part of a reconstruction project, prompting immediate pushback from some residents who thought they'd make the neighborhood feel more "urban." Who knew four-foot-wide strips of pavement could be so controversial?</p>
<p><span id="more-31960"></span><strong>Don't Build Them</strong>: Residents of more than two dozen properties on the street signed and submitted a no-sidewalks petition to the D.C. Department of Transportation last month. Some people maintained the sidewalks were unnecessary because no one really walks there; plus, they'd ruin front yards. "People are opposed to the whole idea of sidewalks," <strong>Gordon Kit</strong> told the <em>Dupont Current</em> last month. "I don't think there's any one primary reason why people are against them....They just don't have any real purpose."</p>
<p><strong>Build Them</strong>: Ward 3 Councilmember <strong>Mary Cheh</strong> has been pro-sidewalk. She says it's city policy to install sidewalks in the course of any street reconstruction; it's a matter of public safety. Plus, some residents say people actually do walk on University Terrace, including children, en route to Key Elementary.</p>
<p><strong>Next Step</strong>: The project was supposed to have begun by now, sidewalks and all, but <strong>John Lisle</strong>, a DDOT spokesman, confirms that the work has been postponed&#8212;yes, at least in part because there "wasn't a clear consensus." The city will continue to "study the issues" surrounding the reconstruction and will get more input from the community, he said. Look for more meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/11/neighborhood-watch-lovinghating-sidewalks-in-palisades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Not Flinty When It Comes to Ice, Either</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/30/were-not-flinty-when-it-comes-to-ice-either/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/30/were-not-flinty-when-it-comes-to-ice-either/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jule Banville</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flinty chicago toughness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=15222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The streets are clear, the schools are open. But guess what, all you flinty former Chicagoans and tough-skinned others? D.C.'s still whining about the weather. This time it's about the ice. On the Listservs, on the forums, in the streets, on the phone, folks want to know what's up with clearing it. Spots where the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/01/icy-sidewalk.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-15202" title="icy-sidewalk" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/01/icy-sidewalk-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>The streets are clear, the schools are open. But guess what, all you flinty former Chicagoans and <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/28/attention-people-from-colder-climes-shut-up/">tough-skinned others</a>? D.C.'s still <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/28/on-a-snow-day-obama-disses-dc-recommends-flinty-chicago-toughness/#comments">whining about</a> the weather. This time it's about the ice. On the Listservs, on the forums, in the streets, on the phone, folks want to know what's up with clearing it. Spots where the sun doesn't hit are still frozen over in a thick layer or, worse, black ice. <strong>Pat Collins</strong>' <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/29/pat-collins-citizens-react-to-obamas-dc-snow-jab/">definitive report</a> on <strong>Obama</strong> dissing D.C. did offer excellent advice (take baby steps, wear proper shoes). But still. D.C. needs someone to blame. How about the Dept. of Public Works?</p>
<p><span id="more-15222"></span><br />
Nice try, but DPW spokesperson <strong>Nancee Lyons</strong> reassures me as she has been reassuring several other D.C. residents who've been bitching about uncleared sidewalks that sidewalks are not her department's problem. Homeowners and business owners are responsible for not only shoveling, but deicing sidewalks as well. The Capital Weather Gang addressed this issue in <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2009/01/deicer_dilemma.html#more">a recent post</a>, recommending calcium chloride over rock salt (sodium chloride). Further: "Calcium chloride costs more, but lasts longer&#8212;it can be used in smaller amounts than rock salt. Also, it does not contain cyanide, an anti-caking chemical that can harm aquatic life." There's a helpful pdf on the post, too, for additional breakdowns about what does what as far as <a href="http://fuckyoupenguin.blogspot.com/">killing fish</a> in the Chesapeake Watershed.</p>
<p>All that's well and fine. But what about the gray areas? I'm referring here to the sidewalks not in front of people's homes or businesses on, say, bridges. Bridge walkways are major routes for people hustling to the Metro to get to work or to the store to grab the essentials when D.C. has a whiff of snow: toilet paper and milk. Who's responsible for clearing the walkways of, say, the Ellington, the Taft, and the Klingle Road bridges? Lyons says she's looking into it, but thinks these would come under the purview of the Dept. of Transportaiton. DDOT spokesperson <strong>Karyn LeBlanc</strong> is looking into it, too, but was not sure when I called. "I think I know the answer, but let me check and call you back," she says.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Lyons has a few words for people complaining to DPW about things DPW isn't required to do and/or asking DPW to write up their lazy neighbors. "Government should limit what they tell people to do," she says. "If we gave out fines for every little thing, we'd get more complaints about that than we do for not giving out fines."</p>
<p>Yes, it's a D.C. regulation of some type that residents are to clear their walkways within eight days of a snow or ice storm, but there's no one out enforcing that. For good reasons.</p>
<p>In Lyons' day (insert uphill-both-ways story here) people shoveled for their neighbors or neighbor kids went around earning a couple of nickles. "People had a better relationship with their neighbors," she says. "Maybe this is a byproduct of living in an urban area....I grew up in the suburbs."</p>
<p><em><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/rpstanton/3233404085/">Flickr photo by Ryan Stanton.</a></em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/30/cry-with-me/#comments">Special thanks to Amanda Hess, JD, and IMGoph for finding this lost blogpost, such as it is, for someone who still doesn't get it.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/30/were-not-flinty-when-it-comes-to-ice-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

