<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; Same-Sex Marrriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/same-sex-marrriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage in Washington, D.C.: Coming Tuesday at 12:01 a.m.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/01/gay-marriage-in-washington-dc-coming-tuesday-at-1201-am/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/01/gay-marriage-in-washington-dc-coming-tuesday-at-1201-am/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike DeBonis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex Marrriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=26282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The D.C. Council has passed a gay marriage recognition bill. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty has signed it. The Board of Elections and Ethics has rejected a referendum effort aimed at overturning it. A Superior Court judge has upheld that decision.
So, barring intervention from the D.C. Court of Appeals&#8212;and, according to a court spokesperson, no appeal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D.C. Council has passed a <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/05/gay-marriage-recognition-passes-council-did-barry-flip-again/">gay marriage recognition bill</a>. Mayor <strong>Adrian M. Fenty</strong> has signed it. The Board of Elections and Ethics has <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/06/15/dc-gay-marriage-referendum-rejected-by-elections-board/">rejected a referendum effort</a> aimed at overturning it. A Superior Court judge has <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/06/30/superior-court-judge-denies-gay-marriage-referendum/">upheld that decision</a>.</p>
<p>So, barring intervention from the D.C. Court of Appeals&#8212;and, according to a court spokesperson, no appeal was filed by close of business today&#8212;gay marriages will very soon be legal in the District of Columbia.</p>
<p><strong>Brian Flowers</strong>, the general counsel for the D.C. Council and the official counter of congressional review days, tells LL today that, by his count, the review period will end at 12:01 a.m. on Tuesday, July 7.</p>
<p><span id="more-26282"></span>Now, if you're expecting a big public spectacle at that hour&#8212;couples heading down to the courthouse at midnight, mass weddings at city hall, etc.&#8212;you may be disappointed: A recognition of an out-of-state marriage is something that does not require any official action on the District's part; if you have a valid marriage license from Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, or California (issued during the 14-week period that it was legal there), you will automatically be considered married in the District.</p>
<p>However, newly legitimate couples are free, of course, to party however they wish.</p>
<p>Referendum backers have indicated in some press reports that they plan to appeal, but their time is running out: A petition would have to be filed tomorrow or early Monday (Friday is a holiday). And Monday would be pushing it.</p>
<p>If they don't appeal&#8212;as Harry Jackson suggested they might, <a href="http://wtop.com/?nid=25&#038;sid=1707878">to WTOP</a>&#8212;they will likely pursue a ballot initiative, which isn't subject to the same time limitations as a referendum (which seeks to overturn a newly passed law). In that case, the issue would almost certainly land right back in the appeals court&#8212;in what would be the last chance for judicial intervention in this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/01/gay-marriage-in-washington-dc-coming-tuesday-at-1201-am/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

