<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; robert pattinson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/robert-pattinson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>There Are Trailers. There Are Teasers. And Now: A 14-Second &#8220;Sneak Peak&#8221; at The Twilight Saga: New Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/11/there-are-trailers-there-are-teasers-and-now-a-14-second-sneak-peak-at-the-twilight-saga-new-moon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/11/there-are-trailers-there-are-teasers-and-now-a-14-second-sneak-peak-at-the-twilight-saga-new-moon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandslam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor lautner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=29421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Full trailer will debut ahead of Bandslam, opening Friday. Until then, squeal accordingly:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full trailer will debut ahead of <i>Bandslam</i>, opening Friday. Until then, squeal accordingly:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvk-zRsM0EM&#038;feature=player_embedded"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/Yvk-zRsM0EM&#038;feature=player_embedded/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/11/there-are-trailers-there-are-teasers-and-now-a-14-second-sneak-peak-at-the-twilight-saga-new-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week&#8217;s Openings: Either Go Up or Drag [Yourself] to Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/29/this-weeks-openings-either-go-up-or-drag-yourself-to-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/29/this-weeks-openings-either-go-up-or-drag-yourself-to-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drag me to hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[little ashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moscow belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvador dali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam raimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=22957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or just go to the art houses and avoid that conundrum altogether. Follow the links for reviews:
Up: Can't imagine what an animated movie about an old geezer, a boy scout, and a floating house could possibly offer? It's Pixar, so plenty.
Drag Me to Hell: Sam Raimi's return to horror is at an astonishing 94 percent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just go to the art houses and avoid that conundrum altogether. Follow the links for reviews:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=37272"><strong><em>Up</em></strong></a>: Can't imagine what an animated movie about an old geezer, a boy scout, and a floating house could possibly offer? It's <strong>Pixar</strong>, so plenty.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/drag_me_to_hell/"><strong><em>Drag Me to Hell</em></strong></a>: <strong>Sam Raimi</strong>'s return to horror is at an astonishing 94 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes. <em>Evil Dead</em> fans rejoice; anyone else remotely interested in the genre should get to a theater and get spooked old-school, pronto.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=37272"><em><strong>Moscow, Belgium</strong></em></a>: This Belgian romantic dramedy about a separated mother and her fling with a much younger anti-stud is more comic than depressing, though not a bit like Hollywood romcoms. For most of you, that will register as a good thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=37271"><em><strong>Revanche</strong></em></a>: A Ukrainian prostitute, an ex-con, and a police officer -- it may sound like the setup of a joke, but they're actually the main characters of this Austrian drama that goes a bit deeper than you might expect from any film that includes a brothel and a bank robbery gone awry.<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/little_ashes/"><br />
<strong><em>Little Ashes</em></strong></a>: <strong>Edward Cullen</strong>...er, <strong>Robert Pattinson</strong> stars in this <strong>Salvador Dali</strong> biopic. Reportedly, Pattinson doesn't suck in his <em>Twilight</em> follow-up, but the film sure does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/29/this-weeks-openings-either-go-up-or-drag-yourself-to-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twilight Wants More of Your Money But Will Settle for Your Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/03/20/twilight-wants-more-of-your-money-but-will-settle-for-your-blood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/03/20/twilight-wants-more-of-your-money-but-will-settle-for-your-blood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd release party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=18625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who care surely already know, but those who don't might want to avoid certain retail locations once the sun goes down tonight.
Twilight, that suckalicious sparkling-vampire movie starring Robert Pattinson (eeeee!) and Kristen Stewart (Bella!), is out on DVD tomorrow. But it's not any ol' DVD release: It's a two-disc Special Edition DVD, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who care surely already know, but those who don't might want to avoid certain retail locations once the sun goes down tonight.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/twilight/"><em>Twilight</em>, that suckalicious sparkling-vampire movie</a> starring <strong>Robert Pattinson</strong> (eeeee!) and <strong>Kristen Stewart</strong> (Bella!), is out on DVD tomorrow. But it's not any ol' DVD release: It's a two-disc Special Edition DVD, and it's going on sale in just less than 12 hours, complete with parties at <strong>Borders</strong>, <strong>Walmart</strong>, and <strong>Blockbuster</strong> locations across the country officially starting at 10 p.m.</p>
<p>Certainly, though, the lines will form much, much earlier. Especially considering that the <em>Twilight</em> folks have not only promised plenty o' giveaways, but <em>"<em>Twilight</em> actors and filmmakers will be making surprise appearances at select locations throughout the country!"</em></p>
<p>And if those facts don't make you faint, you'll certain need a splash of water to the face and a cookie if you decide to give plasma at one of the <strong>blood drives</strong> select Walmarts will host. It's unclear whether the Clinton, Md., store -- apparently the only Walmart throwing a <em>Twilight</em> party -- will be participating.</p>
<p>For more information and to find the location of the nearest screechfest, go to <a href="http://www.twilightthemovie.com/">twilightthemovie.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/03/20/twilight-wants-more-of-your-money-but-will-settle-for-your-blood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 21, 2009: Twilighters Holiday!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/16/march-21-2009-twilighters-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/16/march-21-2009-twilighters-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine hardwicke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenie meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Start lining up outside Borders now: Twilight will be released in a special, 2,394-hour DVD Special Edition on March 21.
Surely, Amazon's preorders are already through the roof. If you haven't heard the details yet, the package will be "packed with bonus features that are sure to please even the most hardcore Twilighter.  
"They include [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start lining up outside Borders now: <i><strong><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36523">Twilight</a></strong></i> will be released in a special, 2,394-hour DVD Special Edition on March 21.</p>
<p>Surely, Amazon's preorders are already through the roof. If you haven't heard the details yet, the package will be "packed with bonus features that are sure to please even the most hardcore Twilighter.  </p>
<p>"They include extended and deleted scenes, three music videos, a commentary with director <strong>Catherine Hardwicke</strong>, <strong>Robert Pattinson</strong>, and <strong>Kristen Stewart</strong>, a featurette on the "Comic-Con Phenomenon" and an in-depth, seven-part documentary, <em>The Adventure Begins: The Journey from Page to Screen</em>, that takes the fan through each step of the film-making process."</p>
<p>A seven-part doc! That should appease even the most ardent Twihards. (Yeah, I said it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/16/march-21-2009-twilighters-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Just In: Taylor Lautner to Return as Jacob Black in New Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/this-just-in-taylor-lautner-to-return-as-jacob-black-in-new-moon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/this-just-in-taylor-lautner-to-return-as-jacob-black-in-new-moon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine hardwicke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacob black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenie meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor lautner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(OK, so the announcement isn't exactly "just in." But until I can program RSS feeds to set off my alarm clock, I'll typically be as useful as dead-tree papers in terms of reporting breaking news.)
So, my dear Twilight fans: Taylor Lautner will be back, despite being toyed with by Summit Entertainment and the People Who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(OK, so the announcement isn't exactly "just in." But until I can program RSS feeds to set off my alarm clock, I'll typically be as useful as dead-tree papers in terms of reporting breaking news.)</p>
<p>So, my dear <i><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36523">Twilight</a></i> fans: <strong>Taylor Lautner</strong> will be back, despite being toyed with by Summit Entertainment and the People Who Make Decisions these last few weeks that they may not want him for the franchise's second installment, <i><strong>New Moon</strong>.</i> It's a pleasant surprise, considering that the widely reported rumors were practically eulogistic. </p>
<p>That's right, I said PLEASANT. I may have picked on director <strong>Catherine Hardwicke</strong>, writer <strong>Stephenie Meyer</strong>, and star <strong>Robert Pattinson</strong> for <i>Twilight</i>'s tediousness. </p>
<p>But I blame Lautner for nothing -- as Jacob, the Native American complication in the Bella-Edward love story, the erstwhile <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=30752">Sharkboy</a> did good. He smiled, he charmed, he made the young girls cry. (Or at least squeal.) Way to go!</p>
<p>And now, let's hear from you. Don't be shy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/this-just-in-taylor-lautner-to-return-as-jacob-black-in-new-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Award for Worst Excuse for Bad Acting Goes To&#8230;OMG! Twilight&#8217;s Robert Pattinson!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/02/and-the-award-for-worst-excuse-for-bad-acting-goes-toomg-twilights-robert-pattinson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/02/and-the-award-for-worst-excuse-for-bad-acting-goes-toomg-twilights-robert-pattinson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine hardwicke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacob black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor lautner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=12954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After this post, I'm totally shutting up about Twilight. (Unless, of course, Taylor Lautner's not invited back to reprise his squeal-inducing role as Jacob Black in the sequel, which would be the biggest news ever.)
But I had to say something about Robert Pattinson's recent remark to OK! magazine about why he's not looking forward to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After this post, I'm totally shutting up about <em><strong><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36523">Twilight</a></strong></em>. (Unless, of course, <strong>Taylor Lautner</strong>'s not invited back to reprise his squeal-inducing role as Jacob Black in the sequel, which would be the biggest news <em>ever</em>.)</p>
<p>But I had to say something about <strong>Robert Pattinson</strong>'s recent <a href="http://www.imdb.com/news/ni0638850/">remark</a> to <em>OK!</em> magazine about why he's not looking forward to filming the franchise's next installment, <strong><em>New Moon</em></strong>. Pattinson claimed that his lifeless-in-a-bad-way performance as hottie vampire Edward Cullen was marred because of..contact lenses.</p>
<blockquote><p>"Wearing coloured contact lenses... It was like I constantly had sand in my eyes. I was wearing them for three months constantly and my eyes never ever accepted them! It took me 20 minutes per eye every single day and I ended up having to literally fold it into my eyeball."</p>
<p>And the star believes the dreaded lenses may inhibit his acting skills - because he couldn't properly portray his character's emotions due to the "two orange blobs" in his eyes.</p>
<p>He adds, "It was frustrating as well because normally your eyes are saying something, but if you've got two orange blobs in your face it's so annoying!</p>
<p>"The director (Catherine Hardwicke) would say, 'Look at her (Kristen Stewart) like you love her,' and I'd be like, 'I'm trying!'"</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh Robert, that explains everything. Now what's the rest of the cast's excuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/02/and-the-award-for-worst-excuse-for-bad-acting-goes-toomg-twilights-robert-pattinson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: &#8220;Twilight&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/23/review-twilight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/23/review-twilight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine hardwicke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenie meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





An actor faces a lot of pressure when tapped to embody a beloved fictional character. But try living up to fan expectations when the author who birthed said character describes him as “devastatingly, inhumanly beautiful,” with a “musical voice” and “soft, enchanting laugh.”
Those adjectives -- along with many, many others that reiterate his perfection -- [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl id="attachment_10945" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/11/twilight.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10945" title="twilight" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/11/twilight-300x225.jpg" alt="It's funny how undead you are" width="300" height="225" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd"></dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>An actor faces a lot of pressure when tapped to embody a beloved fictional character. But try living up to fan expectations when the author who birthed said character describes him as “devastatingly, inhumanly beautiful,” with a “musical voice” and “soft, enchanting laugh.”</p>
<p>Those adjectives -- along with many, many others that reiterate his perfection -- add up to Edward Cullen, the heartthrob teenage vampire who helped Stephenie Meyer's <em>Twilight</em> series become exalted as “the next <em>Harry Potter</em>.” Which would be accurate, if only the novels were better written. And the stories appealed to boys as well as giggly girls (albeit of all ages, apparently). And -- most crucial -- if the franchise's inaugural big-screen adaptation by director Catherine Hardwicke didn't suck more than its vampires actually do.</p>
<p><span id="more-10944"></span></p>
<p><em>Twilight</em> is not Bram Stoker's Dracula. Meyer threw out all the vampiric rules to make Edward (Robert Pattinson) and the other baby Nosferatus in his family sexier, more glam -- because, ew, who'd want to read about a hottie who weakens or combusts in sunlight when he could just, well, <em>sparkle</em> instead? Yes, when Edward insists on showing his new love, a mortal named Bella (Kristen Stewart), what he looks like when the sky's not gray, you might expect something frightening. Instead, he glistens as if covered with Urban Decay glitter. Dreamy! And forget about needing to be invited into someone's home. Edward pops up in Bella's bedroom whenever he feels like it, which is totally hot.</p>
<p>Really, though, Twilight is Bella's story, and scripter Melissa Rosenberg (<em>Step Up</em>) does a fair-to-inadequate job translating the novel's first-person introspection to the screen. Bella is a junior in high school who's moved from her native Phoenix to Forks, Wash., to live with her father, whom she irritatingly calls Charlie (Billy Burke). She hates the rain and the goofy guys who hit on her, but nonetheless becomes friends with the goofiest of the lot, Mike, and the girl who's crushing on him, Jessica (Michael Welch and the usually bitch-cast Anna Kedrick, both of whom give the truest portrayals of their literary origins even in their reduced roles).</p>
<p>Bella stops minding the perpetually overcast weather, though, when she becomes drawn to Edward, a master at playing hard-to-get who hangs only with the rest of his pale, odd foster siblings and nearly busts a dusty blood vessel when Bella ends up sitting next to him in biology class. He glowers and clenches his fists; she naturally swoons, even though it's a love-hate thing for a while because she doesn't understand how someone could act so angry at her when they haven't even spoken.</p>
<p>Edward soon softens around Bella and eventually reveals a few of his quirks: One, his eyes change color. Two, he and his family skip school to go “camping” on sunny days. And three, Edward had to ball his fists and storm out of bio because he was pretty close to chowing down on her fair neck.</p>
<p>Edward can also read minds, but he can't read Bella's, part of what marks her as his “own personal brand of heroin.” But because the Cullens' patriarch, a doctor named Carlisle (Peter Facinelli), has taught his brood to snack only on animals and not on humans -- to lessen that whole monster angle -- Edward cautiously courts the tasty new girl.</p>
<p>The will-they-or-won't-they tension that's rather titillating in the book is all but lost on screen, though. The problem isn't Stewart, best known for <em>Into the Wild</em> and a believable, likable Bella who trips in all the right places. (Meyer saddled her with a case of clumsiness that's as unsubtle as Edward's flawlessness.) Not even Pattinson's to blame -- rather, it's that Hardwicke's interpretation of Edward and his fellow vampires is as ludicrous as Meyer's vision was unachievable.</p>
<p>Try not to laugh when you first see Dr. Cullen at the hospital, treating Bella after an accident: Even among pale Washingtonians, Facinelli's Carlisle looks like an albino mime, as alien as someone with a lab coat and clipboard could look and still resemble a human. And Pattinson's mood-swinging but “musical” reticence too often sounds like a 12-year-old attempting to deepen his voice, with grunts instead of sultry “hello”s resulting. Pattinson tries really, really hard to be really, really ridiculously good-looking, but with crazy hair, pancake'd skin, and almost-tough-guy attitude, he just looks ridiculous.</p>
<p>It doesn't help that, with the exception of some rogue bloodsuckers and a game of -- I swear -- vampire baseball, <em>Twilight</em>'s main action is yearning. Meyer liked her characters to convey their thoughts with expressions almost more often than words; therefore, Pattinson and Stewart do a whole lot of staring. And because Edward's supposed to be a good guy, he shows off his speed instead of his violent side.</p>
<p>The leads have a couple of juicy moments together, and a mini damsel-in-distress arc is thrown in to keep the story from being completely, well, bloodless. When Edward warns Bella that he's a killer, she responds, “I don't believe you!” Neither do we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/23/review-twilight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
