<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; prince</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/prince/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unintended Takeaway From Vanity Fair&#8216;s Washington Post Article</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/unintended-takeaway-from-vanity-fairs-washington-post-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/unintended-takeaway-from-vanity-fairs-washington-post-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Beaujon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katharine weymouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael wolff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article about the Washington Post by Michael Wolff in Vanity Fair: commenting on such things is Wemple's beat. All I could hope to add to the discussion is my belief that the photo of Katharine Weymouth on page 2 of this article is a Prince song waiting to happen.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article about <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2009/10/wolff200910">the <em>Washington Post</em> by <strong>Michael Wolff</strong> </a>in <em>Vanity Fair</em>: commenting on such things is <strong>Wemple</strong>'s beat. All I could hope to add to the discussion is my belief that the<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/business/2009/10/wolff-0910-02.jpg"> photo of <strong>Katharine Weymouth</strong></a> on page 2 of this article is a <strong>Prince</strong> song waiting to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/unintended-takeaway-from-vanity-fairs-washington-post-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

