<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Palin Subject of New Ethics Complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/29/palin-subject-of-new-ethics-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/29/palin-subject-of-new-ethics-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October surprise?
It's Travelgate Palin-Style. Wink. According to a CBS News report: 
"Alaska Governor and Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin may be facing another round of scrutiny, this time for charging the state for her children to travel with her while conducing official state business.
CBS News has obtained a copy of the complaint that Frank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October surprise?</p>
<p>It's Travelgate Palin-Style. Wink. According to a CBS News <a href=" http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/28/cbsnews_investigates/main4554071.shtml">report</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>"Alaska Governor and Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin may be facing another round of scrutiny, this time for charging the state for her children to travel with her while conducing official state business.</p>
<p>CBS News has obtained a copy of the complaint that Frank Gwartney, a retired lineman in Anchorage filed last Friday, with Alaska’s Attorney General, Talis Colber in Juneau. 'Palin ran on the platform of ethics, transparency and anti-corruption. I’m tired of the hypocrisy that exists in Government and people need to know the truth,' said Gwartney." </p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-8286"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> "The complaint against Governor Palin, alleges Misuse of Official Position: 'Gov. Palin attempted to and in fact did use her official position for personal gain by securing unwarranted benefits for her daughters...' All the allegations contained in the complaint are related to state reimbursed travel.</p>
<p>In Alaska, ethics complaints filed against the Governor are confidential. 'We can neither confirm nor refute that a complaint has been filed against Governor Sarah Palin. Any complaint remains confidential unless the person being charged waives confidentiality or if the complaint progresses to the state of probable cause,' Assistant District Attorney, Dave Jones told CBS News."</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/29/palin-subject-of-new-ethics-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another McCain Staffer Hates On Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/28/another-mccain-staffer-hates-on-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/28/another-mccain-staffer-hates-on-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another McCain staffer now has come forward anonymously to declare the veep nominee a "whack job." Not sure why just yet. Maybe it was for her really lame Jackson Five reference.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another McCain staffer now has come forward anonymously to declare the veep nominee a "<a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/palin-a-whack-job-top-mcc_n_138523.html">whack job</a>." Not sure why just yet. Maybe it was for her really lame <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/27/AR2008102702544.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">Jackson Five reference</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/28/another-mccain-staffer-hates-on-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain Camp In PA: A Vote For Obama=Another Holocaust</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/27/mccain-camp-in-pa-a-vote-for-obamaanother-holocaust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/27/mccain-camp-in-pa-a-vote-for-obamaanother-holocaust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is just so much out there crazy talk among McCain supporters/volunteers/paid staff/people-old-enough-to-know-better that it has become difficult to pick out just one item for a morning blog post. McCain's People--and that includes, you Gov. Palin--should read yesterday's Frank Rich column. Just sayin'.
Here's my McCain Camp Crazy Moment of the Weekend:
The Associated Press is reporting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is just so much <em>out</em> there crazy talk among <strong>McCain</strong> supporters/volunteers/paid staff/people-old-enough-to-know-better that it has become difficult to pick out just one item for a morning blog post. <strong>McCain's People</strong>--and that includes, you Gov.<strong> Palin</strong>--should read yesterday's Frank Rich <a href=" http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/opinion/26rich.html?em">column</a>. Just sayin'.</p>
<p>Here's my McCain Camp Crazy Moment of the Weekend:</p>
<p>The Associated Press is reporting that something called the "Republican Federal Committee of PA - Victory 2008" sent out an e-mail to Jewish voters in Pennsylvania. The AP goes on to quote the e-mail. Warning! It is scary! Warning! It is really, really stupid. Warning! It is something that even John McCain would declare as stupid.</p>
<blockquote><p>"'Jewish Americans cannot afford to make the wrong decision on Tuesday, November 4th, 2008,' the e-mail reads. 'Many of our ancestors ignored the warning signs in the 1930s and 1940s and made a tragic mistake. Let's not make a similar one this year!... '</p>
<p>It warns 'Fellow Jewish Voters' of the danger of a second Holocaust due to the threats to Israel from its neighbors and touts Republican presidential candidate John McCain's qualifications over those of Obama."</p></blockquote>
<p>Republicans say they have fired the guy who sent the e-mail and are issuing a "correction" to the 75,000 voters who got the e-mail. </p>
<p>The AP digs up more intrigue or just GOP lameness. I can't decide.</p>
<p><span id="more-7985"></span></p>
<p>It reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Political consultant <strong>Bryan Rudnick</strong> was identified as the person responsible for it. Rudnick, reached Saturday night, confirmed that he no longer works for the party, which employed him a few weeks ago as a consultant to do outreach to Jewish voters.</p>
<p>'I had authorization from party officials' to send the e-mail, Rudnick said, but he declined to say who had signed off on it. 'I'm not looking to drag anyone else through the mud, so I'm not naming names right now,' he said.</p>
<p>The e-mail also accuses Obama of teaching members of the community group <strong>ACORN</strong> 'to commit voter registration fraud' during his years as a community activist."</p></blockquote>
<p>Via <a href=" http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/10/pennsylvania_gop_disavows_infl.php">TPM</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/27/mccain-camp-in-pa-a-vote-for-obamaanother-holocaust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Talks Science, Fails</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/25/palin-talks-science-fails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/25/palin-talks-science-fails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her policy speech yesterday, her first, Palin and Palin's people based it on her one talking point not yet deemed a "lie" or "false"--motherhood. She tries to drop some science on fruit-fly research. She deems fruit-fly research a joke. One of those wasteful earmarks.
Science bites back. Science doesn't like Sarah. At all: 
"This idiot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her policy speech yesterday, her first, <strong>Palin</strong> and Palin's people based it on her one talking point not yet deemed a "lie" or "false"--motherhood. She tries to drop some science on fruit-fly research. She deems fruit-fly research a joke. One of those wasteful earmarks.</p>
<p>Science <a href=" http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/10/sarah_palin_ignorant_and_antis.php">bites back</a>. Science doesn't like Sarah. At all: </p>
<blockquote><p>"This idiot woman, this blind, shortsighted ignoramus, this pretentious clod, mocks basic research and the international research community. You damn well better believe that there is research going on in animal models — what does she expect, that scientists should mutagenize human mothers and chop up baby brains for this work? — and countries like France and Germany and England and Canada and China and India and others are all respected participants in these efforts.</p>
<p>Yes, scientists work on fruit flies. Some of the most powerful tools in genetics and molecular biology are available in fruit flies, and these are animals that are particularly amenable to experimentation." </p></blockquote>
<p>Last night, on <strong>Countdown</strong>, a <em>Newsweek</em> reporter who usually can be counted on to spout dull Conventional Wisdom declared that Sarah Palin's quip that fruit fly research is a joke may in fact be the <strong>Dumbest Thing Sarah Palin Has Ever Said</strong>.</p>
<p>Via <a href=" http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/">Coates</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/25/palin-talks-science-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain Camp Has Its Own Tawana Brawley</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/mccain-camp-has-its-own-tawana-brawley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/mccain-camp-has-its-own-tawana-brawley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the word "hoax"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
OK. The headline was a little harsh. Via TPM:
"By now you've all heard about Ashley Todd, the 20-year-old McCain volunteer who claimed that she was assaulted in Pittsburgh on Wednesday night by an attacker who scratched a 'B' in her cheek after learning that she was for McCain.
The story was flacked madly last night by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/s-bgirl-large.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7939" title="s-bgirl-large" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/s-bgirl-large.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>OK. The headline was a little harsh. <a href=" http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/report_mccain_volunteer_who_cl.php">Via</a><strong> TPM</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"By now you've all heard about <strong>Ashley Todd</strong>, the 20-year-old McCain volunteer who claimed that she was assaulted in Pittsburgh on Wednesday night by an attacker who scratched a 'B' in her cheek after learning that she was for McCain.</p>
<p>The story was flacked madly last night by <strong>Drudge</strong>, even though few if any details had been established or independently confirmed."</p></blockquote>
<p>Well. The woman made it all up. The AP is <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20081024/attack-mccain-sticker/">reporting</a> that police found her story just didn't add up. Here's more of the details:</p>
<blockquote><p>"A McCain campaign volunteer who reported that a tall black man robbed her and then cut a "B" onto her cheek after seeing a McCain bumper sticker on her car has been given a polygraph test because of 'inconsistencies' in her story, police said.</p>
<p>Among other things, police said photos and bank card information from an automated teller machine where the college student claimed she was robbed do not show her using the machine at the time, police said."</p></blockquote>
<p>Yesterday, Todd became a mini <strong>Joe The Plumber</strong>. According to <strong>HuffPo</strong>: "The report of the attack Thursday prompted the Republican presidential candidate and his running mate, Sarah Palin, to call Todd expressing their concern. <strong>Barack Obama</strong>'s campaign also issued a statement wishing Todd well and hoping the attacker would be swiftly brought to justice."</p>
<p>I guess Todd won't be making any appearances on <strong>Fox News</strong>. And I guess McCain will not be citing her in any campaign rallies or using her as some sort of campaign theme.</p>
<p><strong>McKenna</strong> has posted <a href=" http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/the-mccain-volunteer-mugging-story-turns-on-alleged-victim/">some details</a> about the woman's blog earlier today.</p>
<p><strong>Update 3:16 p.m. </strong>A Fox News Honcho <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/fox-news-vp-if-mccain-wor_b_137522.html">says</a> if this assault turns out to be a hoax, McCain's campaign is over. Really? I wouldn't blame Todd for McCain's problems.</p>
<p>*photo courtesy of <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/24/mccain-supporter-who-clai_n_137484.html">Huffington Post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/mccain-camp-has-its-own-tawana-brawley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Morning Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/our-morning-roundup-155/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/our-morning-roundup-155/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brothels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coffeeshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Chicago Tribune has an interview with Palin. The Veep nominee says this: "If people only knew how frugal we are." 
New Columbia Heights asks: Know any brothels in the Hood?

 
And Now, Anacostia reports that Big Chair Coffee is close to opening its doors. This is just one more bit of good news coming out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/guitar1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7873" title="guitar1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/guitar1.jpg" alt="" width="259" height="145" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Chicago Tribune</strong> has an <a href=" http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-sarah-palin-1023,0,7917021.story?xid=rss-page">int</a><a href=" http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-sarah-palin-1023,0,7917021.story?xid=rss-page">erview</a> with <strong>Palin</strong>. The Veep nominee says this: "If people only knew how frugal we are."<strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>New Columbia Heights</strong> <a href=" http://newcolumbiaheights.blogspot.com/2008/10/know-of-any-brothels-in-hood.html">asks</a>: Know any brothels in the Hood?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/guitar.jpg"> </a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>And Now, Anacostia</strong> <a href=" http://anacostianow.blogspot.com/2008/10/big-chair-coffee-gets-its-permits.html">reports</a> that <strong>Big Chair Coffee</strong> is close to opening its doors. This is just one more bit of good news coming out of Anacostia--stuff this blogger is always on top of! And they have the perfect line among all the pictures: "it's just nice seeing the word <em>restaurant</em>."</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Metrocurean</strong> has a confession: It loves ginger. This means a <a href=" http://amandamc.blogspot.com/2008/10/ginger-love.html">piece</a> on a new ginger-flavored booze: "Of my absolute favorite flavors, ginger ranks right near the top. So I was eager to learn more about Domaine de Canton, a new ginger liqueur, at its DC launch dinner at <strong>Central </strong> this week."</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>D.C. Foodies</strong> has some <a href=" http://www.dcfoodies.com/2008/10/as-i-hope-some.html">fightin' words</a>: "Yeah, Mr. Smarty McHealthypants! There is nothing wrong with high fructose corn syrup; its made from F@$#ing CORN for Christ's sake! All natural and all American! What you got to say to that? Yeah, that's what I thought... Eat your popsicle, commie. But seriously, what the hell?" Yeah. Seriously.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>WTOP</strong> is <a href=" http://www.wtop.com/?nid=30&amp;sid=1502656">reporting</a> that someone painted "Scam" on a road in front of a speed camera in MOCO:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: left;"><p>There have been at least two other instances where the words 'GREEDY SCAM' and 'GOV. SCAM' have been written in large letters on Montgomery County roads, directly in front of fixed speed cameras.</p>
<p>Speed cameras have been in use in the county since May 2007. If a driver goes more than 10 miles per hour over the posted the speed limit, a picture of the license plate is taken and a $40 fine is sent in the mail.</p>
<p>The Montgomery County police department maintains it is not trying to catch drivers off guard, just slow them down."</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Pop Cesspoo</strong>l is <a href=" http://www.popcesspool.net/2008/10/sports.html">feelin' angry</a> too: "Dear Tampa Bay Rays fans: Your stadium is shit. We Philly fans know all about shit stadiums. Yours is one. We don't have one anymore. I hate looking at the roof of your stadium, but I can't stop thinking about it, either." Awesome collage if you click on the <a href=" http://www.popcesspool.net/2008/10/sports.html">link</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>TPM</strong> <a href=" http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/10/former_bush_press_secretary_ba.php">notes</a> a former Bush Spokesperson says he is now voting for <strong>Obama</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">*photo from <a href=" http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36391">Mingering story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/24/our-morning-roundup-155/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin&#8217;s Shopping Sprees Might Be Illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-shopping-sprees-might-be-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-shopping-sprees-might-be-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Atlantic is trying to figure out if Palin's $150,000 clothing haul from RNC donations was even legal. They dig through election regs and find at least one mention of where such an expenditure does not fall within legal guidelines. Check it out, here.
I just think this whole mini-scandal goes to the larger Palin narrative. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The<em> Atlantic</em> is trying to figure out if Palin's $150,000 clothing haul from RNC donations was even legal. They dig through election regs and find at least one mention of where such an expenditure does not fall within legal guidelines. Check it out, <a href=" http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/a_legal_issue_with_palin_coutu.php">here</a>.</p>
<p>I just think this whole mini-scandal goes to the larger Palin narrative. She lied about the Bridge to Nowhere. She hyped that pipeline that may never get built. She preached good governance in the face of that troopergate scandal. She claims repeatedly to not run with the Washington crowd and yet spent a lot of time wooing the Washington crowd as mayor and governor as the <em>New Yorker</em> <a href=" http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/27/081027fa_fact_mayer">reports</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, Palin is <a href=" http://www.slate.com/id/2202642/">utterly not qualified </a>to be President. But she's also a phony.</p>
<p>One gets the sense that she's simply playing tourist, loving every minute of her short ride: the touring of Ground Zero, the inane <strong>SNL</strong> cameo, the free clothes and free trips to various battleground states. Palin has taken all this in without an ounce of introspection. Her thoughts are only bumper-sticker deep. For $150,000 in clothes, I would expect a little more than platitudes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-shopping-sprees-might-be-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin&#8217;s $150,000 Clothes Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-150000-clothes-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-150000-clothes-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scene & Herd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Very Expensive Clothes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I'm not one to talk. I have three shirts. I don't know a lot about fashion. But jeez. Sarah Palin ain't looking all Real America. The Politico is reporting that the RNC appears to have shelled out $150,000 for Palin's outfits budget. Talk about welfare!
In between calling Obama a socialist, claiming that he hangs out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/images.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7735" title="images" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/10/images.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="94" /></a></p>
<p>I'm not one to talk. I have three shirts. I don't know a lot about fashion. But jeez. <strong>Sarah Palin</strong> ain't looking all Real America. The <strong>Politico</strong> is <a href=" http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14805.html">reporting</a> that the RNC appears to have shelled out $150,000 for Palin's outfits budget. Talk about welfare!</p>
<p>In between calling Obama a socialist, claiming that he hangs out with terrorists, and lying about that Bridge To Nowhere (remember that?), Palin is shopping on the RNC's dime:</p>
<blockquote><p>"The <strong>Republican National Committee</strong> appears to have spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family since her surprise pick by John McCain in late August.</p>
<p>According to financial disclosure records, the accessorizing began in early September and included bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74.</p>
<p>The records also document a couple of big-time shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, including one $75,062.63 spree in early September.</p>
<p>The RNC also spent $4,716.49 on hair and makeup through September after reporting no such costs in August.</p>
<p>Politico asked the McCain campaign for comment, explicitly noting the $150,000 in expenses for department store shopping and makeup consultation that were incurred immediately after Palin’s announcement. Pre-September reports do not include similar costs.</p>
<p>Spokeswoman Maria Comella declined to answer specific questions about the expenditures, including whether it was necessary to spend that much and whether it amounted to one early investment in Palin or if shopping for the vice presidential nominee was ongoing."</p></blockquote>
<p>The money might be worth it if <strong>Palin</strong> <a href=" http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/21/palin-vp-senate/">actually understood</a> what the Vice President's role actually is.</p>
<p><span id="more-7725"></span></p>
<p>And in case you missed it:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="332" height="316" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="comedy_central_player" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#cccccc" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=188635" /><param name="src" value="http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="316" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml" flashvars="videoId=188635" align="middle" bgcolor="#cccccc" name="comedy_central_player"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/22/palins-150000-clothes-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Bad Is It For McCain?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/21/how-bad-is-it-for-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/21/how-bad-is-it-for-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports that several baseball players from the Tampa Bay Rays appeared yesterday at a rally in support of Obama. The players should be resting, reading up on their World Series opponents. Instead, they're hugging it out with the candidate:
"On Monday, he was endorsed at a rally in Tampa by six players [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>New York Times</em> reports that several <em>baseball players</em> from the <strong><a href=" http://tampabay.rays.mlb.com/index.jsp?c_id=tb">Tampa Bay Rays</a></strong> appeared yesterday at a rally in support of <strong>Obama</strong>. The players should be resting, reading up on their World Series opponents. Instead, they're hugging it out with the candidate:</p>
<blockquote><p>"On Monday, he was endorsed at a rally in Tampa by six players for the Rays — outfielders Jonny Gomes and Carl Crawford, and Fernando Perez, the pitchers David Price and Edwin Jackson, and Cliff Floyd, the designated hitter.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama shook their hands, hugged them, smiled and offered: "'I’ve said from the beginning that I am a unity candidate, bringing people together. So when you see a White Sox Fan showing love to the Rays, and the Rays showing some love back – you know we are on to something right here.'”</p></blockquote>
<p>McCain must be <a href=" http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/21/mccain-hits-obama-on-baseball-loyalities/">fuming</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/21/how-bad-is-it-for-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Post Endorses Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/17/the-post-endorses-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/17/the-post-endorses-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morning roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Post endorses Obama. Its editorial board writes in part:

"There are few public figures we have respected more over the years than Sen. John McCain. Yet it is without ambivalence that we endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president.
The choice is made easy in part by Mr. McCain's disappointing campaign, above all his irresponsible selection of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Post</em> endorses <strong>Obama</strong>. Its editorial board writes in part:</p>
<blockquote><p>
"There are few public figures we have respected more over the years than Sen. John McCain. Yet it is without ambivalence that we endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president.</p>
<p>The choice is made easy in part by Mr. McCain's disappointing campaign, above all his irresponsible selection of a running mate who is not ready to be president. It is made easy in larger part, though, because of our admiration for Mr. Obama and the impressive qualities he has shown during this long race. Yes, we have reservations and concerns, almost inevitably, given Mr. Obama's relatively brief experience in national politics. But we also have enormous hopes."</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-7475"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>"Mr. Obama is a man of supple intelligence, with a nuanced grasp of complex issues and evident skill at conciliation and consensus-building. At home, we believe, he would respond to the economic crisis with a healthy respect for markets tempered by justified dismay over rising inequality and an understanding of the need for focused regulation. Abroad, the best evidence suggests that he would seek to maintain U.S. leadership and engagement, continue the fight against terrorists, and wage vigorous diplomacy on behalf of U.S. values and interests. Mr. Obama has the potential to become a great president...."</p></blockquote>
<p>To read the full editorial go <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/16/AR2008101603436.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/17/the-post-endorses-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens Endorses Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/13/hitchens-endorses-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/13/hitchens-endorses-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe he'll want to revive his column for The Nation again! Is this Hitchens endorsement a shocker? Not really when you consider the man's distaste for lies, propaganda, stupidity, and so on. He writes best when putting McCain in his place (saying what so many are at least thinking):
"But the difference in character and temperament [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he'll want to revive his column for <strong>The Nation</strong> again! Is this <a href=" http://www.slate.com/id/2202163/">Hitchens endorsement</a> a shocker? Not really when you consider the man's distaste for lies, propaganda, stupidity, and so on. He writes best when putting McCain in his place (saying what so many are at least <em>thinking</em>):</p>
<blockquote><p>"But the difference in character and temperament has become plainer by the day, and there is no decent way of avoiding the fact. Last week's so-called townhall event showed Sen. John McCain to be someone suffering from an increasingly obvious and embarrassing deficit, both cognitive and physical. And the only public events that have so far featured his absurd choice of running mate have shown her to be a deceiving and unscrupulous woman utterly unversed in any of the needful political discourses but easily trained to utter preposterous lies and to appeal to the basest element of her audience. McCain occasionally remembers to stress matters like honor and to disown innuendoes and slanders, but this only makes him look both more senile and more cynical, since it cannot (can it?) be other than his wish and design that he has engaged a deputy who does the innuendoes and slanders for him."</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I suppose it could be said, as Michael Gerson has alleged, that the Obama campaign's choice of the word erratic to describe McCain is also an insinuation. But really, it's only a euphemism. Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear had to feel sorry for the old lion on his last outing and wish that he could be taken somewhere soothing and restful before the night was out. The train-wreck sentences, the whistlings in the pipes, the alarming and bewildered handhold phrases—"My friends"—to get him through the next 10 seconds. I haven't felt such pity for anyone since the late Adm. James Stockdale humiliated himself as Ross Perot's running mate. And I am sorry to have to say it, but Stockdale had also distinguished himself in America's most disastrous and shameful war, and it didn't qualify him then and it doesn't qualify McCain now.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/13/hitchens-endorses-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Crowd: From Racism To &#8216;Treason&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-crowd-from-racism-to-treason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-crowd-from-racism-to-treason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloves off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitchen sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day. Another reason to be kinda scared about the people who shout things at Palin rallies. This from a Huffington Post story:
"In the latest instance of inflammatory outbursts at McCain-Palin rallies, a crowd member screamed 'treason!' during an event on Tuesday after Sarah Palin accused Barack Obama of criticizing U.S. troops."
Did this kind of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another day. Another reason to be kinda scared about the people who shout things at <strong>Palin</strong> rallies. This from a <strong>Huffington Post</strong> <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/06/mccain-does-nothing-as-cr_n_132366.html">story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"In the latest instance of inflammatory outbursts at <strong>McCain-Palin</strong> rallies, a crowd member screamed 'treason!' during an event on Tuesday after Sarah Palin accused <strong>Barack Obama</strong> of criticizing U.S. troops."</p></blockquote>
<p>Did this kind of cowboy stuff work for our current president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-crowd-from-racism-to-treason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Ignites Hate Speech At Rally</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-ignites-hate-speech-at-rally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-ignites-hate-speech-at-rally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Dana Milbank reports some scary stuff at a Palin campaign event in Florida:
"Palin's routine attacks on the media have begun to spill into ugliness. In Clearwater, arriving reporters were greeted with shouts and taunts by the crowd of about 3,000. Palin then went on to blame Katie Couric's questions for her "less-than-successful interview with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. <strong>Dana Milbank</strong> <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/06/AR2008100602935.html">reports</a> some scary stuff at a <strong>Palin</strong> campaign event in Florida:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Palin's routine attacks on the media have begun to spill into ugliness. In Clearwater, arriving reporters were greeted with shouts and taunts by the crowd of about 3,000. Palin then went on to blame Katie Couric's questions for her "less-than-successful interview with kinda mainstream media." At that, Palin supporters turned on reporters in the press area, waving thunder sticks and shouting abuse. Others hurled obscenities at a camera crew. One Palin supporter shouted a racial epithet at an African American sound man for a network and told him, 'Sit down, boy.'" </p></blockquote>
<p>What worries me is that there is still a month left before the election. This moment will probably not be the low point for either campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/07/palin-ignites-hate-speech-at-rally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gwen Ifill: Biased Against Follow-Up Questions!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/02/gwen-ifill-biased-against-follow-up-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/02/gwen-ifill-biased-against-follow-up-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
OK. The Veep Debate is over. Perhaps the most hyped debate ever turned out to be a bit of a snooze. While Slate's press critic warned that the format was going to be a problem--a rapid pace of 90-second answers which could only lead to sound bites--I still hoped for fireworks. In Palin's case, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/41717/thumbs/s-PALIN-large.jpg' alt='' class='alignnone' /></p>
<p>OK. The <strong>Veep Debate</strong> is over. Perhaps the most hyped debate ever turned out to be a bit of a snooze. While Slate's press critic warned that the <a href=" http://www.slate.com/id/2201334/">format was going to be a problem</a>--a rapid pace of 90-second answers which could only lead to sound bites--I still hoped for fireworks. In Palin's case, the 90-second answers turned into non-answers and sound bites that could be read/scanned from index cards. </p>
<p>Forget which candidate won or lost. <strong>Gwen Ifill</strong> was the real loser here. Could she have bothered to press either candidate (but<a href=" http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/2008/10/02/the-palin-strategy.aspx"> especially Palin</a>) when they refused--<a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/02/palin-at-debate-refuses-t_n_131435.html">sometimes openly refused</a>--to answer her questions. Or how about a follow-up when Palin suggested expanding the veep's authority? Or what about healthcare? Ifill couldn't even press Palin after the candidate dodged a softball on the candidates' weaknesses. Or when Palin said t<a href=" http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/palin_botches_name_of_afghanis.php">his</a>.</p>
<p>I would have also appreciated Ifill challenging Biden on how the Dems would leave Iraq. And what he thought about <strong>Amtrak</strong>'s pretty crummy snack options.</p>
<p>Don't believe me that Ifill is biased against follow-ups? <strong>Slate</strong> agrees: <a href=" http://www.slate.com/id/2198510/">Ifill lost this debate</a>. </p>
<p>Anyway. Check out our live blogging over at the <a href=" http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/">Sexist</a> while you watch <a href=" http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/">Keith</a>.</p>
<p>*photo via <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">Huffington Post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/02/gwen-ifill-biased-against-follow-up-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin On the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/01/palin-on-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/01/palin-on-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via TPM. Finally. This could be Palin's defining moment. Just embarrassing and shameful. You've been warned [her interview is after Biden's]:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href=" http://talkingpointsmemo.com/">TPM</a>. Finally. This could be <strong>Palin</strong>'s defining moment. Just embarrassing and shameful. You've been warned [her interview is after Biden's]:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBt0r9Exv2I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBt0r9Exv2I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/01/palin-on-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
