<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; Oscars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/oscars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our Morning Roundup: Anne Frank Diary Saved From Culpeper Censors</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/02/our-morning-roundup-anne-frank-diary-saved-from-culpeper-censorsary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/02/our-morning-roundup-anne-frank-diary-saved-from-culpeper-censorsary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culpeper Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H Street NE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Vernon Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=45421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Culpeper County school administrators welcome back Anne Frank!
Some school hack had decided to ban Frank's diary from the county's school curriculum. This was a bad idea as well as an unpopular one. WaPo writes:
"Director of instruction James Allen last week told The Washington Post that the definitive edition of the diary would not be used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Culpeper County school administrators welcome back <strong>Anne Frank</strong>!</p>
<p>Some school hack had decided to ban Frank's diary from the county's school curriculum. This was a bad idea as well as an unpopular one. WaPo <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/01/AR2010020102427.html?hpid=artslot">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Director of instruction James Allen last week told <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/28/AR2010012804001.html">The Washington Post</a> that the definitive edition of the diary would not be used in the future and that the decision was made quickly, without adhering to a formal review policy for instructional materials that prompt complaints. The remarks set off a hailstorm of criticism online and brought international attention to the 7,600-student school system in rural Virginia.</p>
<p>Superintendent Bobbi Johnson said Monday that the book will remain a part of English classes, although it may be taught at a different grade level.</p>
<p>Johnson will convene a committee of English teachers and curriculum specialists this spring to review the diary along with scores of other books to develop a reading list for middle and high school English classes that teachers can use and that parents can review before school starts."</p></blockquote>
<p>On Jan. 29, Johnson <a href=" http://www2.starexponent.com/cse/news/local/education/article/head_of_schools_defends_pulling_version_of_anne_franks_memoir/51306/">was defending her decision to censor and or ban the unedited diar</a>y. Johnson tells WaPo that this new review has nothing to do with censorship. So glad ignorance is just a short car ride away.</p>
<p><span id="more-45421"></span>Join <strong>Frozen Tropics</strong>' <a href=" http://frozentropics.blogspot.com/2010/01/crime-meeting-discussion-thread.html#comments">crime-discussion thread</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Georgetown Metropolitan</strong> ponders <a href=" http://georgetownmetropolitan.com/2010/02/01/georgetowns-little-italy-finally-blooms/">a Little Italy</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Life in Mount Vernon Square</strong> <a href=" http://lifein.mvsna.org/index.cfm/2010/2/1/Is-the-5th&#8211;N-Market-ever-open">wonders if the 5th and N Market is ever open</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Dee Does The District </strong><a href=" http://deedoesdc.blogspot.com/2010/02/health-care-update.html">fights over DCPS cutting their healthcare</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks WaPo for rewriting<a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/01/AR2010020103710.html?hpid=artslot"> a piece on Oscar contenders</a> I already read in the <em>New York Times</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/02/our-morning-roundup-anne-frank-diary-saved-from-culpeper-censorsary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Dead Blogging Here! Live: The Academy Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/no-dead-blogging-here-live-the-academy-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/no-dead-blogging-here-live-the-academy-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=16985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8:01 p.m. Good evening everyone! The ceremony doesn't start for another half-hour, so take this time to settle in, practice your snark, and load up on snacks and DayQuil. (Whoops, maybe only I need that last one. But hey, could make parts of the telecast more interesting.)
8:20 p.m. Starting the montages early with an ode [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>8:01 p.m.</strong> Good evening everyone! The ceremony doesn't start for another half-hour, so take this time to settle in, practice your snark, and load up on snacks and DayQuil. (Whoops, maybe only I need that last one. But hey, could make parts of the telecast more interesting.)</p>
<p><strong>8:20 p.m.</strong> Starting the montages early with an ode to...accountants?</p>
<p><strong>8:25 p.m.</strong> "The lack of concern for Jerry Lewis is horrifying." Funny, Red Carpet Guy. But I'd probably save <strong>Judd Apatow</strong>, too.</p>
<p><strong>8:30 p.m.</strong> Ack! Technical difficulties! DVR keeps trying to make me watch <em>Amazing Race</em>!</p>
<p><span id="more-16985"></span><strong>8:32 p.m.</strong> Love <strong>Robert Downey Jr.</strong>'s fake ego as opposed to <strong>Kate Winslet</strong>'s fake modesty.</p>
<p><strong>8:34 p.m.</strong> Not feeling the song-and-dance number, particularly rhyming "sentiment" with "excrement." But who knew Anne Hathaway could sing?</p>
<p><strong>8:37 p.m.</strong> OK, <em>The Reader</em> bit is making me laugh.</p>
<p><strong>8:42 p.m.</strong> Ladies and gentlemen, all the Best Supporting Actress mistakes we've made over the years...<br />
<strong><br />
8:45 p.m.</strong> This doesn't exactly seem like a great way to shorten the ceremony.</p>
<p><strong>8:48 p.m.</strong> Does <strong>Tilda Swinton</strong> <em>try</em> to look alien?</p>
<p><strong>8:49 p.m.</strong> Dammit! I'm already 0 for 1 in my pool. That was kind of an anticlimactic way to hand out an award, don't you think?</p>
<p><strong>8:55 p.m.</strong> <strong>Steve Martin</strong>, stay! Host!</p>
<p><strong>8:58 p.m.</strong> Yay, <em>Milk</em>! (Though how cute was that <em>WALL*E</em> clip?)</p>
<p><strong>8:59 p.m.</strong> What a touching speech, particularly when he thanked his mother, "who loved me for who I am, even when there was pressure not to."</p>
<p><strong>9:00 p.m.</strong> And now, back to the comedians. </p>
<p><strong>9:02 p.m.</strong> Let the <em>Slumdog</em> droolfest begin.</p>
<p><strong>9:08 p.m.</strong> Of course it's <em>WALL*E</em>.</p>
<p><strong>9:10 p.m.</strong> Uh, I didn't realize one of the animated shorts was titled <em>Lavatory &#8211; Lovestory</em>. I'm guessing it's not as seedy as I'm thinking...</p>
<p><strong>9:11 p.m.</strong> Nice self-deprecation with the <em>Mr. Roboto</em> line.</p>
<p><strong>9:18 p.m.</strong> That jazz is really annoying.</p>
<p><strong>9:19 p.m.</strong> Come on! <em>The Dark Knight </em>deserves recognition! (Besides the billions of dollars it made.)</p>
<p><strong>9:22 p.m.</strong> Big hats, big award.</p>
<p><strong>9:23 p.m.</strong> Just say thanks, costume guy. Nobody cares.</p>
<p><strong>9:26 p.m.</strong> EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! EDWARD CULLEN!!!!!!!!</p>
<p><strong>9:30 p.m.</strong> Aww, the romance montage was pointless but sweet. Except the "I hate you" part.</p>
<p><strong>9:33 p.m.</strong> LMAO! Headline after the show: "Phoenix Murders Ben Stiller."<br />
<strong><br />
9:36 p.m.</strong> Boo! Better catch <em>Dark Knight</em> in IMAX this weekend, 'cause it's not going to be around much longer now.</p>
<p><strong>9:40 p.m.</strong> Oh, so <em>that's</em> why <strong>Jessica Biel</strong> is there. She's the skirt who got stuck hosting the tech awards.</p>
<p><strong>9:47 p.m.</strong> <em>The Pineapple Express</em> bit? Inspired. (Or at least the most inspired thing I've seen so far.)<br />
<strong><br />
9:49 p.m.</strong> WTF? What is <strong>Steven Spielberg</strong>'s cinematographer doing with <strong>James Franco</strong> and <strong>Seth Rogen</strong>?</p>
<p><strong>9:56 p.m.</strong> Wait, is Jackman serious? Did <em>Mamma Mia!</em> really outsell <em>Titanic</em> in the U.K.? (Also, is "gullible" really not in the dictionary?)<br />
<strong><br />
10:02 p.m.</strong> The musical may be back, but that doesn't mean we're suddenly not bored. (Even as classy and well-sung as the number was &#8212; though it looked to me like Ms. Beyonce forgot the lyrics at one point.)</p>
<p><strong>10:07 p.m.</strong> I'm not going to cry. I'm not going to cry.</p>
<p><strong>10:08 p.m.</strong> SEYMOUR PHILIP HOFFMAN?!?</p>
<p><strong>10:15 p.m.</strong> Lovely.</p>
<p><strong>10:19 p.m.</strong> Kinda cruel to have <strong>Bill Maher</strong> present the doc award when <em>Religulous</em> is as good as any of them.</p>
<p><strong>10:21 p.m.</strong> The sprightly scamp (aka Philippe Petit) is here!</p>
<p><strong>10:23 p.m.</strong> Well, there's $2 I'll never see again.</p>
<p><strong>10:27 p.m.</strong> Has there been an action sequence this past year that <em>wasn't</em> set to "Tick Tick Boom?" The Hives are making themselves some money.</p>
<p><strong>10:29 p.m.</strong> Ha! "They can take <strong>Brad Pitt</strong> and turn him into a garden gnome."</p>
<p><strong>10:33 p.m.</strong> Sound? <em>The Dark Knight</em> wins for <em>sound</em>?</p>
<p><strong>10:36 p.m.</strong> That guy is barely taller than an Oscar.</p>
<p><strong>10:39 p.m.</strong> That guy is as bald as an Oscar.</p>
<p><strong>10:46 p.m.</strong> Nothing against <strong>Jerry Lewis</strong>, but the Lifetime Achievement Award is about when I tune out. Time for a coffee...</p>
<p><strong>10:49 p.m.</strong> Damn, dude looks good for a nearly 83-year-old.</p>
<p><strong>11:03 p.m.</strong> But where's <strong><em>Bruuuuuuuce</em></strong>?</p>
<p><strong>11:05 p.m.</strong> <strong>Peter Gabriel</strong>'s kind of a douche for not performing his own song. Is it such a slap in the face to sing it as part of a medley? Would you rather have <strong>John Legend</strong> make it sound better than your own version?</p>
<p><strong>11:09 p.m.</strong> Woo-hoo, "Jai Ho!"</p>
<p><strong>11:11 p.m.</strong> Freida: "Um, you can get your hand off mine now, Liam. You're creeping me out."</p>
<p><strong>11:13 p.m.</strong> The Oscar goes to <em>what</em>? This isn't the kind of upset we were looking for.</p>
<p><strong>11:15 p.m.</strong> Oh no. No one told me the In Memoriam portion of the evening would be accompanied by song. And could they make it a little more difficult to see who we're remembering?</p>
<p><strong>11:21 p.m.</strong> <strong>Reese</strong>, your dress is uneven. And that <strong>Ben Stiller </strong>joke wasn't funny.</p>
<p><strong>11:23 p.m.</strong> <em>Swelling....predictability....</em></p>
<p><strong>11:24 p.m.</strong> Is the FCC going to get its panties in a knot over Boyle's indecent use of "bloody?"</p>
<p><strong>11:30 p.m.</strong> <strong>Kate Winslet</strong>: "Yeah, I've made about 10 thousand more movies than you, Frenchie. Give me my Oscar."</p>
<p><strong>11:35 p.m.</strong> Did Winslet just tell <strong>Meryl Streep</strong> to suck it?</p>
<p><strong>11:40 p.m.</strong> <strong>Robert De Niro</strong>'s speech about <strong>Sean Penn</strong> is my favorite so far. Except for <strong>Ben Kingsley</strong>'s about <strong>Mickey Rourke</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>11:44 p.m.</strong> GO PENN! Commie, homo-lovin' son of a gun right back at you. Nice giving love to Rourke; the political commentary was just right. (But, um, shouldn't he have thanked <strong>Robin</strong>, too?)</p>
<p><strong>11:54 p.m.</strong> And the Oscar goes to...exactly the film everyone's been calling for months. Yawn.</p>
<p>And there's your 81st Academy Awards, everybody. Can't say I had many of the tingly moments I usually do &#8212; maybe it's because I had a computer on my lap all night, but more likely because the night was pretty paint-by-numbers. </p>
<p>Jackman was a class act but I wouldn't mind going back to a few more yuks in 2010. The telecast was still as long as ever; with all the soft-shoe and tastefulness, this year's changes didn't achieve much beyond making you feel the equivalent of having to suck it in all night. </p>
<p>The end-credit coming attractions was a nice touch, though &#8212; definitely boosted my energy a bit and got me excited about what's ahead. At least as excited as I can be after hours and hours of sitting in front of my laptop and the telly. So goodnight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/no-dead-blogging-here-live-the-academy-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Picks (No Surprises Here)</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frozen river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in bruges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mickey rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curious case of benjamin button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wrestler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viola davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall*e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=16963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm always excited about the Academy Awards &#8212; yeah, there are still a few of us left out there &#8212; but I'm guessing there won't be a whole lot of thrilling and/or shocking moments this year. (Most any upset would go thusly: Oooh, the frontrunner didn't win! Which means...someone or -thing completely undeserving did.)
But for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm always excited about the <strong>Academy Awards</strong> &#8212; yeah, there are still a few of us left out there &#8212; but I'm guessing there won't be a whole lot of thrilling and/or shocking moments this year. (Most any upset would go thusly: <em>Oooh, the frontrunner didn't win! Which means...someone or -thing completely undeserving did.</em>)</p>
<p>But for the record, here are my predictions anyway. And tune in at 8:30 when, give or take some DVR-shifting, I'll be live-blogging the entire ceremony. Or at least for as long as my cold medicine holds out.</p>
<p><strong>BEST PICTURE</strong><br />
<em>WALL*E</em>. Not nominated? <em>The Dark Knight</em>. Sigh! How about <em>The Wrestler?</em> OK, I'll stop. It's gonna be <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, though between the five that were chosen I loved <em>Milk</em> the most.</p>
<p><span id="more-16963"></span><br />
<strong><br />
BEST ACTOR</strong><br />
I'd love to see <strong>Mickey Rourke</strong> get this, but <strong>Sean Penn</strong>'s performance as Harvey Milk was so completely transformative, it's gotta be recognized.<br />
<strong><br />
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR</strong><br />
Please. (In this usage, "please" is defined as "<strong>Heath Ledger</strong>.")<br />
<strong><br />
BEST ACTRESS</strong><br />
I'm going with <strong>Kate Winslet</strong>, though her speech better include shout-outs to the makeup crew and her nipples for help making her turn remotely remarkable in <em>The Reader</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS</strong><br />
<strong>Penelope Cruz</strong> has the buzz, but c'mon, she could be passionate and sensuous in her sleep. Would be nice if D.C. native <strong>Taraji P. Henson</strong> got it, but my guess is <strong>Viola Davis</strong> for her brief role in <em>Doubt</em>. The Academy loves those incisive knock-outs.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DIRECTOR</strong><br />
I'm torn. My gut says it'll go to <strong>Danny Boyle</strong> in a <em>Slumdog</em> lovefest. But I wouldn't be surprised if <strong>David Fincher</strong> won for his technically proficient handling of <em>Benjamin Button</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
<em>WALL*E</em> would be a nice upset, and <em>Frozen River</em> and <em>In Bruges </em>were great stories. but I'm thinking this is where <em>Milk</em> will get its love.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM</strong><br />
Please. (In this usage, "please" is defined as "<strong>WALL*E</strong>.")<br />
<strong><br />
BEST ART DIRECTION</strong> and <strong>CINEMATOGRAPHY</strong><br />
Both to <em>The Dark Knight</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST COSTUME DESIGN</strong><br />
Period pieces = Oscar. <em>The Duchess</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DOCUMENTARY</strong><br />
<em>Man on Wire</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT</strong><br />
Total blind guess, but I'm going with <em>The Witness &#8211; From the Balcony of Room 306</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FILM EDITING</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN FILM</strong><br />
I've only seen two of the nominees, but I can't imagine a doc more imaginative and affecting than <em>Waltz With Bashir</em>.</p>
<p><strong>ACHIEVEMENT IN MAKEUP</strong><br />
<em>Ben Button</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ORIGINAL SCORE</strong><br />
<em>Slumdog</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SONG</strong><br />
The popular opinion is that the two <em>Slumdog</em> noms will split the vote. But really, have you heard anything more catchy in a movie this year than <em>Jai Ho</em>? Sorry, <strong>Peter Gabriel</strong>, but <em>Down to Earth</em> is kind of a snooze.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED SHORT</strong><br />
<em>Presto </em>was adorable, the Academy doesn't really do adorable. Going with <em>La Maison en Petits Cubes.</em></p>
<p><strong>BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT</strong><br />
No idea, but <em>Auf der Strecke</em> seems to be getting the praise.<br />
<strong><br />
BEST SOUND EDITING</strong> and <strong>BEST SOUND MIXING</strong><br />
Considering it's nearly dialogue-free yet still the most engaging film of last year, <em>WALL*E</em>'s gotta win both.</p>
<p><strong>BEST VISUAL EFFECTS</strong><br />
<em>Benjamin Button</em>, because if you're honest about it, the film's strongest characteristic is its looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/22/oscar-picks-no-surprises-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Nominations, Cont.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/22/oscar-nominations-cont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/22/oscar-nominations-cont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy award nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amy adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billy crystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gran torino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugh jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curious case of benjamin button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whoopi goldberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=14751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's see, where did I leave off nearly 12 hours ago?
Actually, I don't have a whole lot more to say: 
8) I'm flabbergasted that The Curious Case of Benjamin Button received 13 (!) nominations, while the superior and far more engaging Gran Torino got nothing. 
9) I think Milk and Slumdog Millionaire are the only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's see, where did I leave off nearly <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/22/oscar-nominations-a-quick-cranky-early-morning-reaction/">12 hours ago</a>?</p>
<p>Actually, I don't have a whole lot more to say: </p>
<p>8) I'm flabbergasted that <em><strong>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</strong></em> received <strong>13 (!)</strong> nominations, while the superior and far more engaging <em><strong>Gran Torino</strong></em> got nothing. </p>
<p>9) I think <em><strong>Milk</strong></em> and <em><strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong></em> are the only films that belong in the Best Picture category. </p>
<p>10) I love me some <strong>Amy Adams</strong>, but she could have nailed her minor  <em><strong>Doubt</strong></em> performance while drunk on the blood of Christ.</p>
<p>So it looks like the Feb. 22 telecast will be another long night of predictable winners and people who shouldn't be there. </p>
<p>Speaking of which, I don't know how I missed this announcement, but: <strong>Hugh Jackman</strong> as host? Really? </p>
<p>I'm not saying we need to go back to the days of <strong>Billy Crystal</strong> &#8212; or, shudder, <strong>Whoopi Goldberg</strong> &#8212; but the Oscars require navigation by someone who can quickly take the wind out of its sails. (Hey, my metaphors match.) Pretty dresses &#8212; and faces, nothing against you, Hugh &#8212; aren't quite enough. </p>
<p>But don't think I'll miss one second of it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/22/oscar-nominations-cont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Buy That Dark Knight DVD Just Yet&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angelina jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=11863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, you should totally buy it. I think owning movies is stupid (maybe it's because there's forever a laundry list of stuff I still want to see, but probably because I'm cheap), but even I'd get this one if the nice Warner Bros. peeps hadn't already sent over a for-your-consideration copy. I could watch the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you should totally buy it. I think owning movies is stupid (maybe it's because there's forever a laundry list of stuff I still want to see, but probably because I'm cheap), but even I'd get this one if the nice Warner Bros. peeps hadn't already sent over a for-your-consideration copy. I could watch the Joker scenes all day.</p>
<p>But I digress: You'll have another chance to see <em><strong>The Dark Knight</strong></em> in all its full-screened, Best Picture-worthy glory (yeah I said it) when it's rereleased in theaters both short and IMAX on Jan. 23.</p>
<p>The significance of the date? Oscar noms will be announced Jan. 22, so apparently Warner Bros. is feeling pretty confident. (Normally nominations are announced on a Tuesday, but apparently there's some other big thing going on Jan. 20.)</p>
<p>In related Bat news, Blockbuster announced results of a <a href="http://media.prnewswire.com/en/jsp/latest.jsp?resourceid=3878086&amp;access=EH">survey</a> asking fans which stars they'd like to see in the franchise's third installment. The top two? <strong>Johnny Depp</strong> and <strong>Angelina Jolie</strong> &#8212; which proves that <strong>Joe the Moviegoer</strong> should never be asked for his input, ever.</p>
<p>Depp could possibly shed his recent <em>Pirates of the Caribbean</em> megastardom and bring some of his old-school sinister brilliance to the film. But Jolie, talented though she may be, is just too People Magazine to not be a distraction and undermine the approach director <strong>Christopher Nolan</strong> has had such great success with in <em>Batman Begins</em> and <em>Dark Knight</em>: Using hugely gifted but slightly under-the-radar actors to bring real heft to his more serious reframing of the comic.</p>
<p>I loved <strong>Tim Burton</strong>'s Batman and certainly don't believe all comic-book adaptations should send fans running for a copy of the <em>DSM-IV</em>. But this series has been terrific thus far, so why change things?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/12/batpod.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11866" title="batpod" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/12/batpod.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="216" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

