<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; Neighborhood Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/neighborhood-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Dancing? On U Street?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/23/neighborhood-watch-dancing-on-u-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/23/neighborhood-watch-dancing-on-u-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol Beverage Regulation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholic Beverage Control Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aman Ayoubi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donnell Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Footloose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Valenti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nightclub]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=57233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: Local 16, a U Street bar and restaurant owned by Aman Ayoubi, allegedly violated its voluntary agreement with neighbors. A local resident, Allen Smith, complained to D.C. Councilmember Jim Graham about a "long-standing issue regarding noise," claiming that Local 16 "[operated] more as a night club than it [did] as a restaurant." But, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_57412" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 265px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-57412" title="jitterbugs" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/06/jitterbugs-255x300.jpg" alt="&quot;Jitterbugs,&quot; by William H. Johnson" width="255" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Jitterbugs,&quot; by William H. Johnson</p></div>
<p><strong>The Issue:</strong> Local 16, a U Street bar and restaurant owned by <strong>Aman Ayoubi</strong>, allegedly violated its voluntary agreement with neighbors. A local resident, <strong>Allen Smith</strong>, complained to D.C. Councilmember <strong>Jim Graham</strong> about a "long-standing issue regarding noise," claiming that Local 16 "[operated] more as a night club than it [did] as a restaurant." But, one complaint rang loudest—that Local 16 operated an illegal dance floor on the second floor of its building. Graham enlisted the help of the Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration (ABRA) to look into the allegations.</p>
<p><strong>Goin' Undercover:</strong> Days after ABRA investigators warned Local 16 about the noise violation in early January, investigator <strong>Donnell Butler</strong> went undercover to check out the alleged dance floor. According to the ABRA case report, Butler "observed people consuming what appeared to be alcoholic beverages, conversation, and dancing ... [he] did not observe any tables or chairs on the second floor, although he was unable to determine that this was a designated dance area." Two more ABRA investigators backed up Butler's report after visiting Local 16 the following weekend; they observed "no tables and chairs on the second floor ... the area was crowded with people dancing."</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-57233"></span>Just Dance:</strong> When another ABRA investigator visited Local 16 to ask questions about the dance floor, Ayoubi said that it was "difficult to stop the patrons from dancing if they wanted to." Ayoubi also argued that he had a good relationship with the community, claiming that Local 16 is not a nightclub.</p>
<p><strong><em>What's</em> Next?</strong> Kick off your Sunday shoes! Last week, the city's Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board voted unanimously to levy a $500 fine against Local 16 for noise violations. As for the dance-floor faux pas? ABC Board member <strong>Nick Valenti</strong> said "there was a lack of evidence to substantiate that charge."</p>
<p><em>Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/smithsonian/4247253707/">Smithsonian American Art Museum</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/23/neighborhood-watch-dancing-on-u-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Librarian Layoffs Rattle Cleveland Park</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/15/neighborhood-watch-librarian-layoffs-rattle-cleveland-park/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/15/neighborhood-watch-librarian-layoffs-rattle-cleveland-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget FY 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Park Listserv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Public Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=56418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: After the D.C. Public Library announced citywide staff reductions in early June, Cleveland Park residents flocked to their community Listserv last week to gripe about the decision. Residents' anger seems to stem from the seemingly high number of employees dismissed from the Cleveland Park library, specifically. Out of the 40 library employees laid-off across D.C., five worked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_56438" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 196px"><img class="size-full wp-image-56438" title="3934836365_a5a5b8aec5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/06/3934836365_a5a5b8aec5.jpg" alt="3934836365_a5a5b8aec5" width="186" height="280" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cleveland Park Neighborhood Library</p></div>
<p><strong>The Issue</strong>: After the D.C. Public Library announced citywide staff reductions in early June, Cleveland Park residents flocked to their community Listserv last week to gripe about the decision. Residents' anger seems to stem from the seemingly high number of employees dismissed from the Cleveland Park library, specifically. Out of the 40 library employees laid-off across D.C., five worked at the Cleveland Park branch.</p>
<p><strong>The Impact</strong>: When coupled with the fact that the branch boasts the highest circulation numbers of all neighborhood libraries in D.C., the decision was bound to be ill-received. "We have indeed been Dewey Decimated," wrote Cleveland Park resident <strong>Susie Bennet</strong>. Without the part-time employees, Bennet and other residents worry that the library will become understaffed and less useful. "[I] feel that the CP Library is being unfairly targeted by a library administration which seems to believe in process rather than serving the community," Bennet wrote.</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-56418"></span>The Justification</strong>: Library system spokesperson <strong>George Williams</strong> argued that the lay-offs were necessary. "I would parse it differently," Williams tells City Desk. "The Cleveland Park library actually had more part-time staff than any other neighborhood library. The priority was keeping full-time positions. There were some libraries that lost two, some that lost three, but they didn't have as many part-time staff working."</p>
<p>The lay-offs are only the latest budgetary decision to nip at the heels of D.C. Public Library system. In October 2009, libraries shortened their operating hours, spent less on books, and canceled community programs, such as the Bookmobile, in response to $4.8 million in budget cuts for the 2010 fiscal year. (D.C. Public Library's budget for the 2011 fiscal year shrunk again, <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">less $4.2 million this time around</span>. UPDATE: According to Williams, the 2010 fiscal year budget allocated funded towards "fixed costs such as utilities and telecommunications" in the upcoming fiscal year, which means that the budget cuts amount to $177,000.)</p>
<p><strong>What's Next?</strong> Williams tells City Desk that reinforcements are already on their way. Staff members from other libraries are being transferred to the Cleveland Park branch. "We want to ensure that the same level of programming will continue at Cleveland Park," he says.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/drbeachvacation/3934836365/">drbeachvacation</a>. Creative Commons Attribution License.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/15/neighborhood-watch-librarian-layoffs-rattle-cleveland-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: No Voluntary Do-Overs in Georgetown</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/04/neighborhood-watch-no-voluntary-do-overs-in-georgetown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/04/neighborhood-watch-no-voluntary-do-overs-in-georgetown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Burchfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC Board/ABRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amplified music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANC 2E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabanas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Cuates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Merchan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method of operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neyla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIMBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverside Grill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Birch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony & Joe's Seafood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voluntary Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Harbor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=55339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: Six Georgetown restaurants, including four along Washington Harbour, are trying to back out of their voluntary agreements with neighbors. The VAs, as they're often called in NIMBY circles, legally bind the operators to certain hours and methods of operation as a condition of their licenses to sell alcohol. Violations of these agreements tend to draw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_55394" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-55394" title="Harbor" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/06/Harbor-300x200.jpg" alt="Washington Harbour" width="300" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Washington Harbour</p></div>
<p><strong>The Issue:</strong> Six Georgetown restaurants, including four along Washington Harbour, are trying to back out of their voluntary agreements with neighbors. The VAs, as they're often called in NIMBY circles, legally bind the operators to certain hours and methods of operation as a condition of their licenses to sell alcohol. Violations of these agreements tend to draw the ire of the District's Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration (ABRA). Buzzkill!</p>
<p><strong>It's About Flexibility</strong>: On Tuesday, the Georgetown eateries (<a href="http://www.dcseafood.com/cabanas/index.htm">Cabanas</a>, <a href="http://www.loscuatesrestaurant.com/">Los Cuates</a>, <a href="http://www.dcsocialite.com/mate-lounge-dc">Mate</a>, <a href="http://www.nicksriversidegrille.com/">Riverside Grille</a>, <a href="http://www.neyla.com/">Neyla</a>, <a href="http://www.tonyandjoes.com/">Tony &amp; Joe's Seafood</a>) formally asked local Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) 2E to let them back out of their existing VAs. "We need more flexibility to extend a little more hours and also expand," says <strong>Luis Merchan</strong>, co-owner of Los Cuates at 1564 Wisconsin Avenue NW.  "When we got this place, we got it empty. After six or seven months, this place started picking up and crowding. We see that it needs to be upgraded and expanded."</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-55339"></span>It's About Decibels</strong>: Condo owners at Washington Harbour, at least, are none too pleased at the prospect of restaurants reneging, particularly when it comes to restrictions on amplified music. "As soon as you've got amplified music, then you've got people who speak at a higher voice level because they have to speak above the amplified music," says ANC commissioner <strong>Tom Birch.</strong> "I would like us not to permit any kind of amplified music. It just deteriorates the scene, aesthetically, socially and civilly."</p>
<p><strong>What's Next?</strong> Certainly not cranking the volume. The ANC unanimously rejected the restaurants' request to terminate their voluntary agreements.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Alex Burchfield</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/06/04/neighborhood-watch-no-voluntary-do-overs-in-georgetown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: How Far Should the Georgetown Circulator Circulate?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/16/neighborhood-watch-how-far-should-the-georgetown-circulator-circulate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/16/neighborhood-watch-how-far-should-the-georgetown-circulator-circulate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Liebelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Avenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=32321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: The DC Circulator route up Wisconsin Avenue may soon be no more. The $1 red bus currently runs from Union Station through downtown to M Street, then eventually up Wisconsin. DDOT has proposed cutting the last leg of the service, leaving only two regular city buses to run to upper Georgetown. Despite a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Issue:</strong> The <a href="http://www.dccirculator.com/DCCirculator.html#home">DC Circulator</a> route up Wisconsin Avenue may soon be no more. The $1 red bus currently runs from Union Station through downtown to M Street, then eventually up Wisconsin.<a href="http://georgetownmetropolitan.com/2009/09/14/circulator-to-no-longer-ascend-wisconsin/"> DDOT has proposed</a> cutting the last leg of the service, leaving only two regular city buses to run to upper Georgetown. Despite a big Metrobus route overhaul last year, during which Mayor <strong>Adrian Fenty</strong> dubbed the Circulator a "great solution," it looks like the bus faces a bumpy ride.</p>
<p><span id="more-32321"></span><strong>We Need the Bus: Hazel Denton</strong> of the Citizens Association of Georgetown [CAG] says cutting the Circulator will leave upper Wisconsin residents high and dry: "Eighteen months ago, the mayor said they were going to enhance and streamline transportation, but [if the bus is cut] our service will have been halved in just two years. We feel outraged by this." Some want the Circulator service to extend even farther, to Glover Park.</p>
<p><strong>No, You Don't: <span style="font-weight: normal;">Take the 32 or the 36! Asked about the proposed cut, DDOT had no "official response" for now. But according to CAG, it comes down to budget constraints. <strong>Drew, </strong><a href="http://www.princeofpetworth.com/2009/02/expanded-bus-service-16th-st-express-and-the-circulator-in-ch/"> commenting online</a> earlier this year, also suggested that probable explanation: "I've never seen one with more than one or two riders. Just what we need, more riderless buses clogging the streets." </span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Next Step:</strong> If you want to keep the route, write the mayor or DDOT and complain. If you don't care, go back to surfing the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/16/neighborhood-watch-how-far-should-the-georgetown-circulator-circulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Columbia Heights and the Civic Plaza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/neighborhood-watch-columbia-heights-and-the-civic-plaza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/neighborhood-watch-columbia-heights-and-the-civic-plaza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Plaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streetscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: All eyes are on the Columbia Heights Civic Plaza after the Prince of Petworth posted a sneak preview of construction so far. Engineers were out testing the fountains this morning, and Vincent Kumordzie, resident engineer, says it's all pretty much done. What's left? Planting and landscaping on 14/15 September...completed by 25 September. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="size-medium wp-image-31358 alignright" title="P9020177" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/09/P9020177-300x225.jpg" alt="P9020177" width="234" height="175" />The Issue:</strong> All eyes are on the Columbia Heights Civic Plaza after the <strong>Prince of Petworth</strong> <a href="http://www.princeofpetworth.com/2009/08/reader-sends-in-awesome-columbia-heights-streetscapefountain-photos/">posted</a> a sneak preview of construction so far.<strong> </strong>Engineers were out testing the fountains this morning, and <strong>Vincent Kumordzie, </strong>resident engineer, says it's all pretty much done. What's left? Planting and landscaping on 14/15 September...completed by 25 September. So how's it looking?</p>
<p><strong>Proponent:</strong> 12th and W is pretty <a href="http://www.princeofpetworth.com/2009/08/reader-sends-in-awesome-columbia-heights-streetscapefountain-photos/">impressed</a>: "It looks terrific, will be a lovely place to people watch. I just hope they have installed enough seating."</p>
<p><strong>Opponent:</strong> Joni, meanwhile, <a href="http://www.princeofpetworth.com/2009/08/reader-sends-in-awesome-columbia-heights-streetscapefountain-photos/">bemoans</a> the lack of greenery...in verse:</p>
<p><span id="more-31226"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>They took all the trees<br />
Put ’em in a fountain<br />
And they charged the people<br />
A dollar and a half just to see ’em<br />
Don’t it always seem to go<br />
That you don’t know what you’ve got<br />
Till it’s gone<br />
They paved paradise<br />
And put up a mosaic style fountain…yah!</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Next step: </strong>The grand opening &#8211; Fenty's office should be deciding on a date soon.</p>
<p><em>Photo courtesy of DDOT</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/04/neighborhood-watch-columbia-heights-and-the-civic-plaza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Shaw Residents vs. The Park Service</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter G Woodson Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Park Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Milefsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue: Shaw residents are infuriated by delays at the National Park Service (NPS). They want the agency to hurry up and develop three vacant, rundown properties in the neighborhood, including the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historical Site. Is NPS doing all it can?

No: Irate resident Ray Milefsky writes on the Shaw listserv: "You, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The issue: </strong>Shaw residents are infuriated by delays at the National Park Service (NPS). They want the agency to hurry up and develop three vacant, rundown properties in the neighborhood, including the <a href="http://www.nps.gov/cawo/index.htm">Carter G. Woodson Home National Historical Site</a>. Is NPS doing all it can?<br />
<strong><br />
No: </strong>Irate resident <strong>Ray Milefsky</strong> writes on the Shaw listserv: "You, the Park Service, are dissing the Shaw community and the City by keeping these buildings as magnets for vagrancy, trash, and criminal activity...We are fed up and angered at being told to look for the pie-in-the-sky when all we can smell is the defecation at your doorstep in OUR neighborhood."</p>
<p><span id="more-31090"></span></p>
<p><strong>Yes:</strong> <strong>Robert Parker</strong>, NPS Site Manager, stresses the need for planning, management, planning, resources, and...planning: "There is a process. It takes time, resources and planning. We're currently working out a general management plan with a directional format for...how we plan to manage the resources."</p>
<p>He anticipates that work on the site will start around 2012.</p>
<p><strong>Brian Smith</strong> sets out his own time frame in the listserv debate: "...this will continue until <strong>Malia Obama</strong> is 40 years old."</p>
<p><strong>Next step:</strong> A general update of the vacant properties question will be presented at the ANC2C meeting tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: 14th Street and the Arts Overlay District Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/01/neighborhood-watch-14th-street-and-the-arts-overlay-district-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/01/neighborhood-watch-14th-street-and-the-arts-overlay-district-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANC 2F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Doughty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts overlay district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Mae Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Hemphill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemphill Fine Arts Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Truesdale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=30904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: The Uptown Arts Overlay District Committee has been struggling with how to keep 14th Street—between Thomas Circle and U Street—an artsy mecca. The booming restaurant scene stands accused of provoking rent hikes, a development that leaves arts and retail struggling. According to a new committee report, "by the end of 2009 this district [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Issue</strong>: The Uptown Arts Overlay District Committee has been struggling with how to keep 14th Street—between Thomas Circle and U Street—an artsy mecca. The booming restaurant scene stands accused of provoking rent hikes, a development that leaves arts and retail struggling. According to a new committee report, "by the end of 2009 this district is at serious risk of losing almost one half of its existing contemporary visual arts uses."</p>
<p>The report suggests increasing the limit on restaurant frontages from 25% to 40-50%. And—in certain circumstances—lifting the restrictions on heights for buildings used for art-related activities. But is it inevitable that smaller galleries will be driven out?</p>
<p><strong>No</strong>: <strong>Andrea Doughty</strong>, chair of the Arts Overlay Committee, says: "Art galleries are always at the vanguard, searching for cheaper areas. But we want to incentivize so they remain here.... Everybody benefits from these art uses."</p>
<p><strong>Yes: Sandra Truesdale, </strong>proprietor of the Emma Mae Gallery says: "People are coming to the neighborhood with more money. Developers see that and put up rent.... I think that the galleries that are not funded and are directed to lower income people, perhaps they will close. The city should come forward and support small galleries."</p>
<p><span id="more-30904"></span></p>
<p><strong>Next step:</strong> The new Arts Overlay District Report is being presented at the <a href="http://www.anc2f.org/">ANC 2F</a> meeting on Wednesday, September 2.</p>
<p><strong> </strong><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/01/neighborhood-watch-14th-street-and-the-arts-overlay-district-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Rock Creek Park and Deer Burgers</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-rock-creek-park-and-deer-burgers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-rock-creek-park-and-deer-burgers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrienne colman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexa fritts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer burgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john hadidian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overpopulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Creek Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=30869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: Should we shoot the deer? The National Park Service (NPS) is trying to decide how to deal with the white-tailed deer population. They've been mating like rabbits and eating all the shrubs.
Proponent: Adrienne Colman, Superintendent of Rock Creek Park, says: "It's just one of the options. Montgomery County has been sharpshooting for some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Issue:</strong> Should we shoot the deer? The National Park Service (NPS) is trying to decide how to deal with the white-tailed deer population. They've been mating like rabbits and eating all the shrubs.</p>
<p><strong>Proponent: Adrienne Colman</strong>, Superintendent of Rock Creek Park, says: "It's just one of the options. Montgomery County has been sharpshooting for some years now...It reduces the deer population fairly quickly."</p>
<p>As in Montgomery County, the Rock Creek crew would donate the meat to charity. Three words: <strong>free venison burgers</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Opponent:</strong> <strong>John Hadidian</strong>, director of the Urban Wildlife Program at the Humane Society of the United States is sticking up for the deer: "We don't think that the deer should be blamed for something that is natural to them. It doesn't seem that there is a compelling reason to kill these animals."</p>
<p><strong>Alexa Fritts,</strong> spokeswoman for the National Rifle Association, says: "overpopulation of deer can have a devastating effect on...songbirds."</p>
<p><strong>Next step:</strong> The National Park Service is holding a public meeting at the Rock Creek Park Nature Center (<span><span>5200 Glover Rd NW</span></span>) on Wednesday, September 2 to debate the options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-rock-creek-park-and-deer-burgers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Mount Pleasant and the Festival Latino</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-mount-pleasant-and-the-festival-latino/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-mount-pleasant-and-the-festival-latino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don juan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[festival latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Pleasant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=30941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: The Festival Latino is set to return to Mount Pleasant at the end of September. Or is it? Some local residents and businesses are not completely stoked about the idea.
Proponent: Alberto Ferrufino of Don Juan restaurant says: "We support the festival 100%. There are a few people here who think they are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Issue: </strong>The Festival Latino is set to return to Mount Pleasant at the end of September. Or is it? Some local residents and businesses are not completely stoked about the idea.</p>
<p><strong>Proponent: </strong><strong>Alberto Ferrufino</strong> of Don Juan restaurant says: "We support the festival 100%. There are a few people here who think they are the king or the government, but I don't know what they are protesting about."</p>
<p><strong>Opponent: Kelly DiNardo, </strong>manager of Past Tense Yoga studio, writes in a Google group discussion: "We do have some very serious concerns. The current plans call for a stage almost directly outside of the studio. We could not hold classes with that level of noise outside the studio.... While I think the festival provides other value—cultural enrichment, community involvement—it cannot be allowed to damage or undercut Mt. Pleasant businesses."</p>
<p>Local Resident <strong>Sam Broeksmit</strong> says: "It's a very hard neighborhood to traverse from East to West. Last year they closed Irving street."</p>
<p><strong>Next step</strong>: A community meeting to discuss the festival is set for Tuesday 1 September.</p>
<p>CORRECTION: Kelly DiNardo, of Past Tense yoga studio, was identified as an opponent of Fiesta DC's return. While she did have "very serious concerns" about its impact on her studio's classes, DiNardo says she supports the festival overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/31/neighborhood-watch-mount-pleasant-and-the-festival-latino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood Watch: Brookland</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/28/neighborhood-watch-brookland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/28/neighborhood-watch-brookland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kapila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abdo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brookland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa on 10th]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=30780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular updates on D.C. community issues!
The Issue: The Abdo &#8211; Catholic University of America (CUA) development. It fits in with the Small Area Plan (SAP) aimed at rejuvenating Brookland. Both sides of Monroe Street are to be made over, bringing 725 condos units to the area, along with a number of new retail outlets and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Regular updates on D.C. community issues!</em></p>
<p><strong>The Issue</strong>: The Abdo &#8211; Catholic University of America (CUA) development. It fits in with the Small Area Plan (SAP) aimed at rejuvenating Brookland. Both sides of Monroe Street are to be made over, bringing 725 condos units to the area, along with a number of new retail outlets and cafes.</p>
<p><strong>Proponent</strong>:<strong> Lisa on 10th</strong> sees this as a much needed boost to Brookland. She writes on Brookland listserv:</p>
<p><span id="more-30780"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>My husband and I live at "ground zero" for the development too and we are excited to have well done development come to our neighborhood. We do not like have to go everywhere BUT Brookland for retail, a variety of restaurants (we love Bobby's Q and the new Tex-Mex place but 2 &#8212; haven't been to Brookland Cafe yet &#8212; just isn't enough), a good coffee shop or two, and other retail establishments. Geez, we'd even like to see some healthy competition in the neighborhood.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Opponent</strong>: ANC 5A<strong> </strong>Commissioner<strong> Carolyn Steptoe</strong> thinks it'll ruin Brookland: "These units will bring in at least another 725 residents. And if they are double occupancy &#8211; 1400. We are against the plan because of the magnitude of population density." She's also worried about more congestion, and less park space.</p>
<p>Five ANC commissioners already opposed the Small Area Plan (SAP) before a commission, but the Council approved it anyway, she says.</p>
<p>Former Jefferson Airplane drummer<strong> Jerry Peloquin</strong> says:</p>
<blockquote><p>"they'll use 'faux stone'."</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Next step</strong>: The Abdo/CUA plans appear before a zoning commission on October 5th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/08/28/neighborhood-watch-brookland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

