<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Funeral Parking: Should You Have to Worry About Tickets?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/25/funeral-parking-should-you-have-to-worry-about-tickets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/25/funeral-parking-should-you-have-to-worry-about-tickets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Liebelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Padro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funeral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=33347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Issue: How far should the city go to keep mourners from worrying about parking tickets? A bill before the D.C. Council proposes a five-hour window in which funeral attendees cannot be ticketed in residential zones &#8211; as well as the creation of designated funeral zones non-attendees can’t park in during that same time slot. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-33368" title="No Parking" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/09/3307067431_a993faff7a-200x300.jpg" alt="No Parking" width="151" height="227" />The Issue:</strong> How far should the city go to keep mourners from worrying about parking tickets? A bill before the D.C. Council proposes a five-hour window in which funeral attendees cannot be ticketed in residential zones &#8211; as well as the creation of designated funeral zones non-attendees can’t park in during that same time slot. But in neighborhoods like Shaw, which has more than three dozen houses of worship, some fear the legislation is impractical and could hurt business.<span id="more-33347"></span></p>
<p><strong>Mourning Should Be Exempt: </strong>Supporters say slapping parking tickets on funeralgoers' cars is unnecessary &#8211; not to mention mean-spirited &#8211; and the  bill already has a number of cosponsors. At-Large Councilman <strong>Michael Brown</strong>, who introduced the legislation, <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/D_C_-proposes-5-hours-of-free-parking-for-mourners-8283726-60708912.html">told</a><em> </em>the<em> Washington Examiner</em>: "To have to run out in the middle of a service or have to leave the service early in fear of receiving a parking violation is insensitive to this sacred event."</p>
<p><strong>But Everyone Else Still Needs to Park: </strong>“Outrageous, shocking and wacky” are the words Shaw advisory neighborhood commissioner <strong>Alex Padro</strong> uses to describe the bill. He told City Desk<em> </em>that allotting five hours during the day is simply unrealistic: “People who live on the block won’t be able to park for the better part of a business day, because parking will be restricted only to the funeral. What happens [in neighborhoods like Shaw] when there’s five or six at a time?”</p>
<p><strong> Next Step: </strong>Although Padro doesn’t believe the legislation will pass in its current form, he says he will be talking to other commissioners to formulate a response. He might support reducing the time window to one hour. The hearing for the legislation has not yet been scheduled.</p>
<p><em>Photo of the parking sign on Feb. 24, 2009 by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aldrin_muya/">Aldrin Muya</a>, Creative Commons Attribution License </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/25/funeral-parking-should-you-have-to-worry-about-tickets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>510 Calories for a Cookie?!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/16/510-calories-for-a-cookie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/16/510-calories-for-a-cookie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brianne Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Msnbc.com posted an article today about New York City's new legislation requiring city restaurants to post calorie counts in the same size and font as the food price.
New Yorkers have been in the throes of sticker shock since this spring when the Big Apple became the first city in the country to implement a law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Msnbc.com posted an article today about New York City's new legislation requiring city restaurants to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25464987/">post calorie counts</a> in the same size and font as the food price.</p>
<blockquote><p>New Yorkers have been in the throes of sticker shock since this spring when the Big Apple became the first city in the country to implement a law forcing chain restaurants to post the calorie count of each food in the same size and font as the price. &#8230; Many New Yorkers are finding that even the foods they thought were lower calorie really aren&#8217;t. &#8230; Outside the Forest Hills&#8217; Dunkin&#8217; Donuts, Juan Restrepo, the 45-year-old owner of a construction company, said he was quitting corn muffins &#8212; 510 calories! &#8212; this time for good. &#8230; Vicki Freedman, who lives in Manhattan, watches her weight and always tries to choose a light option when eating out. But the 26 year old just discovered that the Friday&#8217;s pecan-crusted chicken salad, served with mandarin oranges, dried cranberries and celery, has 1,360 calories.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think this law is brilliant. Those three- or even four-digit numbers displayed next to innocent-looking cookies, frappaccinos, and even salads will surely bring accountability back to eating. Those who dread stepping on the scale may be most daunted by the new law, but I think it'll do us good. This law may be a catalyst for restaurants to choose healthier ways of preparing dishes.</p>
<p>It might make some people upset to have their meals "ruined," but that frustration would be short-lived. Eating healthy and giving up the fettuccine alfredo can be a drag, but it's like exercise: you don't want to do it, but you feel pretty good later for doing it.</p>
<p>The article mentions similar laws being implemented in Seattle, Santa Clara and San Francisco by the end of the year, which is absolutely fantastic. I think DC should follow suit. Plus, if we already had a law like that here, I probably wouldn't have eaten (and now feel so sick from gorging on) a burger and milkshake for lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/07/16/510-calories-for-a-cookie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

