<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; HD TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/hd-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Convention HD Update: Inspecting McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/09/05/convention-hd-update-inspecting-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/09/05/convention-hd-update-inspecting-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political beauty contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Last week, I reported on Obama's radiant,&#xA0; mesmerizing, slightly spittled High Definition look as he accepted the Democratic nomination for president. In the post, I reasoned that if even the 47-year-old NILF came off as less-than-perfect in HD, the 72-year-old McCain had an even tougher beauty contest in front of him. (Earlier, Slate's Timothy Noah [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="right;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/John_McCain_official_portrait_with_alternative_background.jpg/439px-John_McCain_official_portrait_with_alternative_background.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="275" /></p>
<p>Last week, I reported on Obama's <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/29/obama-youve-got-something/">radiant,&#xA0; mesmerizing, slightly spittled</a> High Definition look as he accepted the Democratic nomination for president. In the post, I reasoned that if even the <a href="http://www.myspace.com/barackobama">47-year-old NILF</a> came off as less-than-perfect in HD, the 72-year-old<strong> McCain </strong>had an even tougher beauty contest in front of him.<strong> </strong>(Earlier, <em>Slate</em>'s <strong>Timothy Noah</strong> went so far as to suggest that McCain's championing of HD technology, as radium to Curie, might be the cause that would <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2191704/">do him in</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://s.wsj.net/media/mccain904f_S_20080904222435.jpg">How wrong I was</a>.</p>
<p>Note to John McCain's beautician: Strike fast with the promotional tie-ins. How quickly can you pump out the <strong>McCain/Palin </strong>age-reversing foundation / <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199250/">ass-kicking lipstick</a> box set?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/09/05/convention-hd-update-inspecting-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

