<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; free shit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/free-shit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Screen on the Green Canceled?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/12/screen-on-the-green-canceled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/12/screen-on-the-green-canceled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free shit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Lemmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Mall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen on the Green]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=21867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We Love DC is reporting that HBO has canceled this year's Screen on the Green. The blog writes:
"HBO has cancelled the long-running Screen on the Green program for 2009, according to a representative from HBO’s consumer affairs department."
So no Double Indemnity on the Mall, no Rebel Without A Cause under the stars. No reason was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/05/6601_rebel_without_a_cause_jigsaw_puzzle_lg.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-21873" title="6601_rebel_without_a_cause_jigsaw_puzzle_lg" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/05/6601_rebel_without_a_cause_jigsaw_puzzle_lg.jpg" alt="" width="306" height="389" /></a></p>
<p><strong>We Love DC </strong>is reporting that <a href=" http://www.welovedc.com/2009/05/12/hbos-screen-on-the-green-canceled-for-2009/">HBO has canceled this year's Screen on the Green</a>. The blog writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>"HBO has cancelled the long-running Screen on the Green program for 2009, according to a representative from HBO’s consumer affairs department."</p></blockquote>
<p>So no <em>Double Indemnity</em> on the Mall, no <em>Rebel Without A Cause</em> under the stars. No reason was given for the cancellation of this summer event.</p>
<p><strong>DCist </strong><a href=" http://dcist.com/2009/05/hbo_cancels_screen_on_the_green.php">confirms the bad news</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/05/12/screen-on-the-green-canceled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man Madness: Introducing the Manliest Workplace in D.C. Tournament</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/man-madness-introducing-the-manliest-workplace-in-dc-tournament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/man-madness-introducing-the-manliest-workplace-in-dc-tournament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awesomeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games of Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bracketology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free shit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manliest workplace in D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=7417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The American workplace’s storied glass ceiling is in pretty bad shape. Female workers are on the fast track to conquering the upper echelons of all sectors of industry, including the nation’s highest office. But what about that unsung other half of our nation’s workforce: men?  In 2008, what workplaces may truly call themselves manly?
In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/man-madness" alt="" /></p>
<p>The American workplace’s storied glass ceiling is in pretty bad shape. Female workers are on the fast track to conquering the upper echelons of all sectors of industry, including the nation’s highest office. But what about that unsung other half of our nation’s workforce: men?  In 2008, what workplaces may truly call themselves manly?<em></em></p>
<p>In order to find D.C.'s remaining manly strongholds, <em>The Sexist</em> is pleased to announce D.C.'s <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/">Manliest Workplace Competition</a>! Beginning next week, <em>The Sexist</em> will run 64 D.C. workplaces in eight industries through a highly unsophisticated algorithm to assess each organization’s manliness. In order to determine manliness, <em>the Sexist</em> will take the top 10 positions in each organization, ascertain which positions are staffed by men, then assign a point value to each male staffer. A man in the highest-ranking position (i.e., president, CEO, publisher) will earn 10 points; one in the 10th-most-powerful spot will receive one point. The manliest workplace—one that employs all men, all the time, in the most powerful and well-paid positions—can score as high as 55 on the Manly Index. The least manly workplace—one that employs no men, none of the time, in any position—will receive a zero.*</p>
<p><span id="more-7417"></span>Who’s manlier—the <strong>National Cathedral </strong>or the <strong>Founding Church of Scientology</strong>? The <strong>Supreme Court</strong> or the <strong>U.S. Postal Service</strong>? Stay tuned with <em>The Sexist</em> as the tournament continues to see which workplaces are manly enough to ignore all those pesky cracks in the glass ceiling. Also stay tuned for Crack Watch!—where we tally the number of women we find creeping into the org. charts of D.C. institutions.</p>
<p>Think you know manly from mannish? <a href="../../assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/">Fill out a bracket</a> by Monday, Oct. 20, to be submitted in our contest. The entrant with the bracket that most closely resembles the <em>Sexist</em>’s findings will win a <em>City Paper</em> prize pack!</p>
<p><em>* Note: </em>The Sexist <em>reserves right to base assumptions on hasty once-over of workplace’s org chart. If a workplace’s chart does not have clearly ranked positions, the</em> Sexist<em> will arbitrarily assign rank. If a workplace employs fewer than 10 people in total, the </em>Sexist<em> will improvise.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/">Read more about the tournament</a> on <em>The Sexist</em>, the <em>City Paper</em>'s sex and gender blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/10/16/man-madness-introducing-the-manliest-workplace-in-dc-tournament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

