<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; forecast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/forecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Sun Will Come Out. Tomorrow.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/10/the-sun-will-come-out-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/10/the-sun-will-come-out-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Niedowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital weather gang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the sun will come out tomorrow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=46635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to sound like Annie or anything, but: The sun will come out. Tomorrow.
Here's the forecast, according to our favorite weather folks over at Capital Weather Gang:
Strong winds continue for much of the day with gusts past 30 mph at times before diminishing late. Sunshine returns with highs probably near or a smidge above freezing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-46648" title="215px-Annie_Musical_Poster" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/02/215px-Annie_Musical_Poster-191x300.jpg" alt="215px-Annie_Musical_Poster" width="153" height="227" />Not to sound like <a href="http://www.songlyrics.com/annie/the-sun-will-come-out-lyrics/"><strong>Annie</strong></a> or anything, but: The sun will come out. Tomorrow.</p>
<p>Here's the forecast, according to our favorite weather folks over at <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/">Capital Weather Gang</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Strong winds continue for much of the day with gusts past 30 mph at times before diminishing late. Sunshine returns with highs probably near or a smidge above freezing in the low-and-mid 30s.</p></blockquote>
<p>The forecast for later in the week—partly to mostly sunny Friday, Saturday, and into Sunday with high temperatures in the 30s—comes with two caveats. I hate to even bring this up. But: CWG says we</p>
<blockquote><p>still have to keep an eye on a coastal storm for early in the weekend. For now it looks like it will stay south and out to sea, but that's not a done deal yet. And by late Sunday or Monday, an area of snow could be approaching from the west courtesy a clipper system originating in Canada. For now, there's not much confidence in whether this system will materialize and how strong it would be. We'll keep you posted.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/02/10/the-sun-will-come-out-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;Improved&#8221; Weather Page</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Wemple</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital weather gang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edward thiede]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People don't need much from a newspaper's weather page or from the forecast on the evening news. You want the graphic saying what the weather will be, along with the high and the low for the day. Preferably the presentation will give you an accurate picture of the next few days. 
And that's all you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don't need much from a newspaper's weather page or from the forecast on the evening news. You want the graphic saying what the weather will be, along with the high and the low for the day. Preferably the presentation will give you an accurate picture of the next few days. </p>
<p>And that's all you need. Period. </p>
<p>For the longest time, the <em>Washington Post</em> understood this basic human need. The design of its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/weather/index.html">local weather page</a> reflected as much. Brilliant in its simple, info-delivering elegance, it gave you just the snapshot you wanted. I can remember mornings when I'd flip to the last page of the Metro section, and I'd glean everything I needed in less than two seconds. Not even the Internet can beat that kind of efficiency. The glorious layout is right here, may God rest its soul:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/10/oldweather1.jpg" alt="oldweather" title="oldweather" width="226" height="151" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-34594" /></p>
<p>Somehow, the <em>Post </em>wasn't satisfied with perfection. <span id="more-34581"></span></p>
<p>So it switched to this approach: </p>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2009/10/newweather.jpg" alt="newweather" title="newweather" width="111" height="166" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-34596" /></p>
<p>Answer me one question, <em>Post</em>: How, o how, is this an improvement? Why do you send me plunging into a mass of data just to find out what my extended outlook looks like? </p>
<p>Did the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/">Capital Weather Gang</a> force a geeking-out of the weather presentation, focusing on all kinds of climatological arcana, instead of, like, the only data we need?  </p>
<p>Not really. According to <em>Post </em>news projects editor <strong>Edward Thiede</strong>, the new approach to weather was part of the overall print redesign that launches next week. Since this particular part of the project was ready to go a bit early, they let it fly. </p>
<p>As for the reorganization of the page and the disappearance of that marvelous, boxy extended outlook, Thiede has a pretty sound explanation: "We wanted to organize it down the left side of the page," he says. "We thought it would be one area to see all the local weather data together." </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

