<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; DESTINY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/destiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Giants Should&#8217;ve Let the Redskins Win One</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/06/the-giants-shouldve-let-the-redskins-win-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/06/the-giants-shouldve-let-the-redskins-win-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave McKenna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BALTIMORE RAVENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DESTINY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW YORK GIANTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA EAGLES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPER BOWL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Redskins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=12993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bet the mortgage on the Eagles and/or Cardinals this weekend.
Both these squads got beat by the Redskins this year --- the Cardinals in Week 3 and the Eagles in Weeks 5 &#38; 16.
In recent seasons, there aren't many harbingers of Super Bowl success as trusty as taking a whupping from the lowly Skins.
You can look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet the mortgage on the <strong>Eagles</strong> and/or <strong>Cardinals</strong> this weekend.</p>
<p>Both these squads got beat by the <strong>Redskins </strong>this year --- the Cardinals in Week 3 and the Eagles in Weeks 5 &amp; 16.</p>
<p>In recent seasons, there aren't many harbingers of <strong>Super Bowl</strong> success as trusty as taking a whupping from the lowly Skins.</p>
<p>You can look it up.</p>
<p>In 2000, the Redskins beat the <strong>Baltimore Ravens</strong>, 10-3 during the regular season. The Ravens went on to beat the <strong>Giants</strong> in <strong>Super Bowl XXXV</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-12993"></span></p>
<p>In 2002, the beginning of the <strong>Spurrier Era</strong>, the Redskins beat <strong>Tampa Bay</strong>, 40-10, in preseason. The Bucs went on to crush the Oakland Raiders in <strong>Super Bowl XVII.</strong></p>
<p>In 2003, the Skins whupped the <strong>New England Patriots</strong>, 20-17, at FedEx. The Pats went on to win <strong>Super Bowl XXXVIII</strong>.</p>
<p>In 2005, the Redskins beat the <strong>Pittsburgh Steelers</strong>, 17-10, in preseason at home. The Steelers crushed the <strong>Seattle Seahawks</strong> in <strong>Super Bowl XL</strong>.</p>
<p>And last season, the Skins beat the Giants, 22-10, on the road in Week 15. The Giants upset the undefeated Patriots in <strong>Super Bowl XLII</strong>.</p>
<p>Luckily for Eagles fans, the Giants whupped the Skins in both regular season encounters this year.</p>
<p>And, Phoenix could be on Easy Street, since the <strong>Carolina Panthers</strong> absolutely destroyed Washington, 47-3, in August in a preseason game.</p>
<p><strong>Vegas</strong>, are you listening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/06/the-giants-shouldve-let-the-redskins-win-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
