Examiner's Michael Neibauer was first to report this morning that Ward 5 Councilmember Harry Thomas Jr. got his car booted last week.

He had failed to pay four tickets incurred by his 2007 Audi Q7 SUV, according to the Department of Motor Vehicles. The Audi was parked in a rush hour zone on Sept. 21; parked in a street-cleaning zone on Oct. 8; parked in a loading zone on Nov. 17; and parked in a bus stop on Dec. 15.

Thomas told Neibauer on Sunday that they were "not valid tickets," which comports with what he told LL on Friday afternoon. Actually, Thomas was somewhat more conciliatory: "I pay my tickets and pay my violations like any other citizen," he said. "I am law-abiding citizen. I follow the rules."

But Thomas was more interested in talking about how LL (and Neibauer) came to find out about his booting.

He pointed out how embarrassing stories have emerged about various foes of Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, including Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray home-improvement troubles.

"I have been one of those adversaries," Thomas said. "'Conspiring against the councilmember' is what I'd say to you. That tells you what level it's gotten to...This is this administration trying to feed you stuff."

Perhaps it is, perhaps it isn't; the photo above was e-mailed to LL from one "John Doe."

Moral of the story: Pay your parking tickets.

In an memo issued June 23, Attorney General Peter Nickles addressed two issues: the use of city-owned cars in Department of Motor Vehicles driver tests, and the use of city employees' own private cars while on government business.

Regarding the former, the memo [PDF] notes that as of Aug. 1, DMV "will no longer use government vehicles for its driver's tests." That, Nickles writes, is due to "weak indemnification language" in the waivers the test-takers have to sign—those require the driver to take responsibility for any damage to the cars, unless they are "not financially capable of doing so." Such a policy, Nickles writes, "makes it virtually impossible for the District to successfully obtain reimbursement" in the case of an accident.

This, of course, poses the question: How are unlicensed drivers supposed to find a car to take their test in? And, even if they can, how are they supposed to get the car to the test site?

LL posed those questions to the mayor's office yesterday; he has yet to receive any explanation.

As far as the latter issue goes, D.C. employees have long been allowed to use their personal cars on government business, then collect a mileage-based reimbursement for the use. The problem, Nickles wrote in last week's memo, is "a recent increase in claims against the District involving motor vehicle property damage by District employees." Add to that the new Zipcar-based fleet management system and "current budget constraints to pay damage claims," and you've got a no-brainer: Nickles says that "effective immediately supervisors should not approve the use of private vehicles by District employees, except in rare instances where doing so is absolutely necessary."

But that move raised the hackles of at least one employee union. Johnnie Walker, president of AFGE Local 383, says "a train wreck is going to happen."

In particular, he says, caseworkers for the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services, the Department of Mental Health, the Department on Disability Services, among others, will find it harder to do their jobs.

"The District, historically, has never had enough government vehicles for employees to do the government's work," Walker says. "Workers have always used their personal vehicles."

And the alternatives aren't going to work, he says: "They're asking the employees to utilize Metro and bus service. If this was Manhattan, I would be all for it, but the Metro system does not get them to their necessary site visits." As for the Zipcar system, he notes that the availability of Zipcars around DDS headquarters, downtown on 15th Street NW, "is limited."

Nickles apparently heard some of those concerns: In a followup memo released today, he backed off a bit, saying that "reliance on employees' use of personal vehicles for official transportation may be necessary and justified under some circumstances."

In today's memo, Nickles says the city "will be re-evaluating the policies and procedures that currently apply to the use of personal vehicles for official business and may implement additional requirements with respect to that process." In the meantime, D.C. employees can keep using their own cars where other modes of transportation "are not reasonably available."

Mike Kalyan, City Paper's former production manager, moved from D.C. to Alexandria recently. He needed to register his car. Kalyan brought in his paperwork to the DMV office on Four Mile Run. His paperwork was, characteristically, in order. And then the employee asked him if the mileage total on his car was correct. He confirmed the total: 126,058 miles. In an email, Kalyan relates what happened next:

The employee then told me that my reading was less than what the DC title said it was. I looked at the DC title and it said 829985. Apparently the person who processed the paperwork when I titled my car in DC included the "tenth" of the odometer. The employee then informed me that I would have to go back to the DC DMV and have them pull the original paperwork, correct and re-issue the title before I could transfer the title to VA! This means at least three more trips: one to the DC DMV to get this straightened out and then back to VA for a title, then for inspections, and then to get it registered.

Kalyan tried to plead his case, saying the only way he could have put nearly a million miles on his car was to have driven it 2,280 miles per week. It didn't work. See you in line, Mike!