<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; dark knight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/dark-knight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Buy That Dark Knight DVD Just Yet&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angelina jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=11863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, you should totally buy it. I think owning movies is stupid (maybe it's because there's forever a laundry list of stuff I still want to see, but probably because I'm cheap), but even I'd get this one if the nice Warner Bros. peeps hadn't already sent over a for-your-consideration copy. I could watch the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you should totally buy it. I think owning movies is stupid (maybe it's because there's forever a laundry list of stuff I still want to see, but probably because I'm cheap), but even I'd get this one if the nice Warner Bros. peeps hadn't already sent over a for-your-consideration copy. I could watch the Joker scenes all day.</p>
<p>But I digress: You'll have another chance to see <em><strong>The Dark Knight</strong></em> in all its full-screened, Best Picture-worthy glory (yeah I said it) when it's rereleased in theaters both short and IMAX on Jan. 23.</p>
<p>The significance of the date? Oscar noms will be announced Jan. 22, so apparently Warner Bros. is feeling pretty confident. (Normally nominations are announced on a Tuesday, but apparently there's some other big thing going on Jan. 20.)</p>
<p>In related Bat news, Blockbuster announced results of a <a href="http://media.prnewswire.com/en/jsp/latest.jsp?resourceid=3878086&amp;access=EH">survey</a> asking fans which stars they'd like to see in the franchise's third installment. The top two? <strong>Johnny Depp</strong> and <strong>Angelina Jolie</strong> -- which proves that <strong>Joe the Moviegoer</strong> should never be asked for his input, ever.</p>
<p>Depp could possibly shed his recent <em>Pirates of the Caribbean</em> megastardom and bring some of his old-school sinister brilliance to the film. But Jolie, talented though she may be, is just too People Magazine to not be a distraction and undermine the approach director <strong>Christopher Nolan</strong> has had such great success with in <em>Batman Begins</em> and <em>Dark Knight</em>: Using hugely gifted but slightly under-the-radar actors to bring real heft to his more serious reframing of the comic.</p>
<p>I loved <strong>Tim Burton</strong>'s Batman and certainly don't believe all comic-book adaptations should send fans running for a copy of the <em>DSM-IV</em>. But this series has been terrific thus far, so why change things?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/12/batpod.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11866" title="batpod" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2008/12/batpod.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="216" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/12/09/dont-buy-that-dark-knight-dvd-just-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Slumdog Millionaire&#8221; Rivals &#8220;Dark Knight&#8221; Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/slumdog-millionaire-rivals-dark-knight-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/slumdog-millionaire-rivals-dark-knight-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, depending on how you look at it: Danny Boyle's latest about an Indian teenager who hits it big on his country's version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire is not likely to bring in $900+ million before it even hits DVD.
But according to indieWIRE, Slumdog Millionaire's per-screen box office over its opening weekend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, depending on how you look at it: <strong>Danny Boyle</strong>'s latest about an Indian teenager who hits it big on his country's version of <em>Who Wants to Be a Millionaire</em> is not likely to bring in $900+ million before it even hits DVD.</p>
<p>But according to <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/biz/2008/11/iw_bot_weekend_3.html"><em>indieWIRE</em></a>, <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>'s per-screen box office over its opening weekend is comparable to the summer's -- and possibly the decade's -- biggest blockbuster, earning $35,043 per house versus <em>Dark Knight</em>'s $36,283 July average.</p>
<p>Not bad for a film without its own action figures. Wonder if execs are already sketching <em>Slumdog Idol</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/slumdog-millionaire-rivals-dark-knight-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
