<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City Desk &#187; bennie g. thompson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/tag/bennie-g-thompson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Audit of Inaugural Security?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/03/audit-of-inaugural-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/03/audit-of-inaugural-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Wemple</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bennie g. thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purple Tunnel of Doom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=15319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just another case-in-point attesting to why the official probe is Washington's biggest industry. In the aftermath of the inauguration, the Washington Post gave air to complaints from high-flying Obama donors that they weren't frisked extensively enough before being allowed into sensitive areas. If ever there was a more pointed affirmation of a charmed life&#8211;complaining about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another case-in-point attesting to why the official probe is Washington's biggest industry. In the aftermath of the inauguration, the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/29/AR2009012903894.html">gave air to complaints</a> from high-flying Obama donors that they weren't frisked extensively enough before being allowed into sensitive areas. If ever there was a more pointed <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/30/not-enough-security-at-inauguration/">affirmation of a charmed life</a>&#8211;complaining about not enough security!</p>
<p>Now a congressman is pushing for an audit of security, on the following basis: "In the interest of ensuring the integrity of Secret Service protective operations, and the security of our nation's leaders, I request that you audit the Secret Service protective security plans for the Inauguration, investigate and identify any deficiencies in security operations," wrote Rep. <strong>Bennie G. Thompson</strong> (D-Miss.) in a letter to some big shot at the Department of Homeland Security. </p>
<p>How 'bout <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/25/how-did-law-enforcement-mess-up-obamas-inauguration/">this deficiency</a>, Mr. Congressman? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/02/03/audit-of-inaugural-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

