The Office of the Attorney General continues to play stall ball in the Pershing Park cases. Recently, District lawyers lost their bid to take back documents previously turned over to plaintiffs attorneys. The fight over the never-ending discovery now centers around the District's filing of a motion for a protective order banning vasts amounts of government documents.

OAG attorneys argue that the order would simply and reasonably protect personal information from being made public. Attorneys even use Washington City Paper to zing plaintiffs lawyers!

Read More "Pershing Park Case: Nickles Seeks Order Barring Public From Seeing Discovery Materials" »

At this point in the whole Pershing Park court mess, AG Peter Nickles is supposed to just play nice and hope the two big cases settle. Nickles offered up his problematic mea culpa and promised that settlements would be forthcoming. It appears his sweet talk has an expiration date.

Last week, plaintiffs lawyers in the Chang case filed an emergency motion to get the OAG to comply with a request to take a deposition. The plaintiffs lawyers wanted to depose a District official "regarding the District's preservation or lack thereof of electronically stored materials, including e-mails."

This deposition goes to the heart of the entire court mess. And it may be important since the D.C. Council hasn't come close to investigating the Pershing Park discovery problems or the missing evidence in the case.

But the OAG decided to prevent such a deposition from taking place. The lawyers write in their motion:

"Two days before the deposition was to go forward, District counsel unilaterally and without cause announced that the deposition was cancelled, suggesting that it continues to believe its litigation strategy of discovery abuse can continue without consequences."

More on this drama after the jump.

Read More "Pershing Park Case: OAG Reverts Back To Stonewalling" »

Seven years on and still more government documents being "found" and turned over to plaintiffs attorneys in the messy Pershing Park case. Today, AG Peter Nickles filed a notice that roughly 2,000 pages of documents had been produced for the plaintiffs. This is not the first of such notices nor will it be the last.

Nickles writes to the court that "these documents were located as part of the District's sweeps of the OAG Civil Litigation Division." Also included with the production was a privilege log reflecting documents redacted or withheld.

Read More "Pershing Park Case: OAG Finds 2,000 Pages Of Discovery Materials" »

Today, plaintiffs attorneys in one of the Pershing Park cases filed their response to AG Peter Nickles' sworn statement submitted to the court on August 12. The plaintiffs' response is a 26-page takedown of the OAG's and the D.C. Police Department's conduct in the case as well as a refutation of Nickles' own sworn declaration [PDF}.

At issue: the missing evidence, doctored or missing radio dispatches, and a discovery process that has lasted for years without an end in sight. Nickles' statement apparently has done little to assure plaintiffs that they will be getting a full accounting of what happened during the mass arrests at Pershing Park---and what happened to all that missing evidence.

The attorneys state that they were so disappointed with Nickles and Co.'s representations to the court, they can only form one conclusion: the need for an independent investigation, and "severe sanctions."

Read More "Pershing Park Case: Plaintiffs Call For ‘Independent Inquiry’" »