<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No More LivingSocial Remorse: Coupon-Trading Site CoupFlip Coming to D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:23:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109137</guid>
		<description>@Kate - Clearly you work for &quot;CoupFlip&quot; and that was a terrible plug for them.

Personally I think the idea is ridiculous.  First off you are counting on people to purchase a &quot;deal&quot; in which they are interested enough to buy in the first place, then hoping they don&#039;t redeem the voucher (which I&#039;m sure usually happens only a week or so out from the actual validity date of the voucher.  So just like craigslist &quot;you&#039;re likely to get stuck with it never selling&quot;.

Another thing that won&#039;t work is when the campaign requires the customer to be a &quot;new customer only&quot; in which case the person buying this &quot;coupon of a coupon&quot; won&#039;t be able to redeem it at the merchant and then have the cycle of contacting &quot;coupflip&quot; customer support (if they have this service) and then finding out they have to contact LivingSocial or Groupons customer service to receive original conditions based on the original voucher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kate - Clearly you work for "CoupFlip" and that was a terrible plug for them.</p>
<p>Personally I think the idea is ridiculous.  First off you are counting on people to purchase a "deal" in which they are interested enough to buy in the first place, then hoping they don't redeem the voucher (which I'm sure usually happens only a week or so out from the actual validity date of the voucher.  So just like craigslist "you're likely to get stuck with it never selling".</p>
<p>Another thing that won't work is when the campaign requires the customer to be a "new customer only" in which case the person buying this "coupon of a coupon" won't be able to redeem it at the merchant and then have the cycle of contacting "coupflip" customer support (if they have this service) and then finding out they have to contact LivingSocial or Groupons customer service to receive original conditions based on the original voucher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109099</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109099</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to know how LS thinks they&#039;re going to police that. If I was a business I&#039;d swear up and down I checked that name against the credit card they used. Is LS going to start secret shopper testing their coupon sellers? Not bloody likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd love to know how LS thinks they're going to police that. If I was a business I'd swear up and down I checked that name against the credit card they used. Is LS going to start secret shopper testing their coupon sellers? Not bloody likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109096</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109096</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Tobin! Take a look at the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're right, Tobin! Take a look at the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109095</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109095</guid>
		<description>Your name is printed right on the Livingsocial coupons.  All Livingsocial has to do is start requiring that vendors check ID when people redeem coupons, and Coupflip will be out of business.  It&#039;s a pretty risky business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your name is printed right on the Livingsocial coupons.  All Livingsocial has to do is start requiring that vendors check ID when people redeem coupons, and Coupflip will be out of business.  It's a pretty risky business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109094</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109094</guid>
		<description>@SamuelMoore - If you look at CoupFlip.com it gives you an instant offer for your deal.  Pretty cool. If you try to sell stuff on that other site (or craigslist) you&#039;re likely to get stuck with it never selling.

Definitely worth checking out http://www.CoupFlip.com if you won&#039;t end up using some of your deals. Also, nice if you missed something on Groupon or LivingSocial. Hope they come out with a mobile app soon. That would be really helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SamuelMoore - If you look at CoupFlip.com it gives you an instant offer for your deal.  Pretty cool. If you try to sell stuff on that other site (or craigslist) you're likely to get stuck with it never selling.</p>
<p>Definitely worth checking out <a href="http://www.CoupFlip.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.CoupFlip.com</a> if you won't end up using some of your deals. Also, nice if you missed something on Groupon or LivingSocial. Hope they come out with a mobile app soon. That would be really helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @SamuelMoore</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109093</link>
		<dc:creator>@SamuelMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109093</guid>
		<description>How is this different than https://www.dealsgoround.com/ ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this different than <a href="https://www.dealsgoround.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.dealsgoround.com/</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/07/27/no-more-livingsocial-remorse-coupon-trading-site-coupflip-coming-to-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-1109092</link>
		<dc:creator>RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=92009#comment-1109092</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with the guy.  This is just a secondary market for a product they&#039;ve already sold.  It may increase redemption rates, which depending on your perspective and strategy could be good or bad for the individual businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with the guy.  This is just a secondary market for a product they've already sold.  It may increase redemption rates, which depending on your perspective and strategy could be good or bad for the individual businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
