City Desk

SEC to Expand Into Denuded Edward Durrell Stone Building

In a former professional life, this City Desk contributor worked in the bowels of the old U.S. Department of Transportation headquarters building at 7th and D streets SW. The Nassif Building, as it was called, had dismal interior spaces with removable walls that made the office building in the 1985 film Brazil seem cheery.

The Constitution Center, no longer much of an Edward Durrell Stone building anymore. (Photo courtesy Constituion Center)

The Constitution Center, no longer much of an Edward Durell Stone building anymore. (Photo courtesy Constitution Center)

But its exterior, with its narrow vertical window wall clad in bright white stone, was an amazing physical structure to approach every morning, especially coming up on Metrorail escalators that spit you out in the middle of the equally impressive courtyard, with a fountain in the middle. The building was designed by Edward Durell Stone, the architect better known for designing the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and the National Geographic headquarters at 17th & M streets NW.

Over the years, critics have not been kind to Stone. His main appeal these days seems to be as an icon of a certain historic era in architecture. A couple years ago, some New Yorkers—including Tom Wolfewere up in arms a couple years ago when Stone's No. 2 Columbus Circle "lollypop" building was being "reskinned" in ways that fundamentally altered its historic appearance. But in D.C., Stone's Nassif Building near L'Enfant Plaza has met a similar fate with barely anyone raising a fuss.

The renovated Nassif Building became the generic-sounding Constitution Center, and the exterior narrow and vertical window wall was replaced with glass starting in 2007. (D.C. developers love glass!) And as the Washington Business Journal reported Wednesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has signed a lease for 900,000 square feet worth of space in the empty building.

The Constitution Center's history page notes the building was designed by "noted architect" Edward Durell Stone. But with the building's exterior so fundamentally changed, why even bother to mention Stone's name anymore?

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • IMGoph

    exactly. this isn't his building anymore. it's like saying puff daddy's "been around the world" is a david bowie song.

  • dvarner

    This is an interesting article in light of other mid-century modern buildings in DC (and the region) that are subjects of future development. The Christian Science Church and MLK Library, for instance. What should be done with the lesser works of significant architects? What if the building in question was not really designed by the "master", but by a partner, yet still bears the identity of the master's firm name?

  • Mark

    The "old" building was a dump but the courtyard had book sales, fruit and vegetable stands and ice cream trucks in the nice weather and was a pleasant gathering place with places to sit and crepe myrtles. Now it's a fortress.