Jim Graham’s New Logo Embraces Sartorial Trademark
Ward 1 Councilmember Jim Graham today kicked off his re-election campaign. That involved launching a new Web site—complete with oodles of listed accomplishments, a YouTube video, and...a new logo.
Notice any familiar accouterments?
7:09 pm
Please make all donations in cash, in unmarked bills, place in plain brown paper bags and deliver via hand to the new bagman, Chuck Thies. American currency preferred!
7:10 pm
that red color is harsh, ouch hurts my eyes.
7:18 pm
hopefully we'll soon be replacing the bow tie with an orange jumpsuit
10:07 pm
Please, please, please people of Ward 1 get rid of the 'Queen Of All Media', I live in Ward 2 and I can not take seeing her anymore, grand standing for the media with nothing to say, just like Fenty.
9:09 am
Actually, if you look at his re-election Web site, all donations are to be sent to his home...which is odd. Why have the donations go to your home? Why not a post office box? Why not a campaign office?
1:26 pm
Anonymous-Probably raising cash in anticipation of a lengthy time in court.
1:32 pm
Jim Graham = YUK
6:04 pm
I think I just threw up.
10:23 pm
graphics-wise, it is sartorially underwhelming, the color makes him look fat, and brings out the bloodshot in his eyes, and the broken capillaries in his face.
but all in all, it is that nice chavez-ortega red.
send donations to his home address? really?
1:51 am
That font disturbs me like air turbulence on three drinks ... I'm thinking 1970s sitcom, an updated version of the Brady Bunch in Columbia Heights. Strawberry jam on meatloaf. I just can't tell. The font is invading my head space. Gotta go. Now.
10:19 am
FACT CHECK
Where on the Jim Graham campaign website does it say to send donations to his home address?
Nowhere.
And even if it did, what's the problem with that? Does it make a difference if the campaign uses a PO Box vs. a home address?