<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metro Weekly Issues Terrible Statement About Demise of Washington Blade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMC</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-690361</link>
		<dc:creator>DMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-690361</guid>
		<description>If not simple antagonism, I&#039;m not sure what the point of this article is supposed to be.  Its author calls MW&#039;s statement &quot;bad politics,&quot; but isn&#039;t this commentary bad politics in the same sense?  

From what I can tell, MW sent out an obligatory press release acknowledging the end of the Blade&#039;s publication, noting its importance to the LGBT movement&#039;s history, and then included a self-promotional boilerplate about MW.  Just as Bugg&#039;s statement could be read as sarcastic or antagonistic (and who knows without witnessing the tone oneself?), MW&#039;s assertion that it will continue to grow and publish LGBT news for the Washington, D.C. market could be read as an affirmation that the region&#039;s LGBT community won&#039;t be left without a local journalistic advocate.  

Both of these impressions are speculative--nothing more than shallow opinions that may be valid personal reactions, but what purpose does either really serve as a matter of public discourse? 

In the end, a commentary on MW&#039;s public reaction doesn&#039;t accomplish anything other than potentially causing friction and damaging the public perception of MW, which continues to serve the LGBT population.  Interested readers should know that MW (and now the DC Agenda) is available as a resource to them, not be given the impression that its publisher is a villainous and exploitative businessman with no soul.  (That is admittedly an exaggeration of Mr. Wemple&#039;s article, but that&#039;s the implied take that readers should come away with.)

It&#039;s unfortunate that Mr. Wemple didn&#039;t invest his time and energy into writing something more thoughtful and less antagonistic--or in reporting news.  Nothing against the author--I don&#039;t know him--but the collapse of Window Media should offer plenty of opportunity for journalistic investigation, not the instigation of gossip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not simple antagonism, I'm not sure what the point of this article is supposed to be.  Its author calls MW's statement "bad politics," but isn't this commentary bad politics in the same sense?  </p>
<p>From what I can tell, MW sent out an obligatory press release acknowledging the end of the Blade's publication, noting its importance to the LGBT movement's history, and then included a self-promotional boilerplate about MW.  Just as Bugg's statement could be read as sarcastic or antagonistic (and who knows without witnessing the tone oneself?), MW's assertion that it will continue to grow and publish LGBT news for the Washington, D.C. market could be read as an affirmation that the region's LGBT community won't be left without a local journalistic advocate.  </p>
<p>Both of these impressions are speculative--nothing more than shallow opinions that may be valid personal reactions, but what purpose does either really serve as a matter of public discourse? </p>
<p>In the end, a commentary on MW's public reaction doesn't accomplish anything other than potentially causing friction and damaging the public perception of MW, which continues to serve the LGBT population.  Interested readers should know that MW (and now the DC Agenda) is available as a resource to them, not be given the impression that its publisher is a villainous and exploitative businessman with no soul.  (That is admittedly an exaggeration of Mr. Wemple's article, but that's the implied take that readers should come away with.)</p>
<p>It's unfortunate that Mr. Wemple didn't invest his time and energy into writing something more thoughtful and less antagonistic--or in reporting news.  Nothing against the author--I don't know him--but the collapse of Window Media should offer plenty of opportunity for journalistic investigation, not the instigation of gossip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687926</guid>
		<description>The Advocate is the only gay publication worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Advocate is the only gay publication worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687435</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687435</guid>
		<description>i meant be former blade emlployees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i meant be former blade emlployees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687434</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687434</guid>
		<description>anyone who thinks there&#039;s a story here knows nothing about business. if it were the other way around the Blade would waste no time in doing the same, if not worst. and plus if mw is so inferior to the blade why would most of mw staffers be former mw employees who left that publication at their own will. this is a stupid attempt to start something out of nothing. let&#039;s not forget the blade was the only local publication reporting on mw going online without even quoting anyone from mw in their story. i thought cp was the go to when you uncovered that ill attempt but this story makes me think differently of cp as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone who thinks there's a story here knows nothing about business. if it were the other way around the Blade would waste no time in doing the same, if not worst. and plus if mw is so inferior to the blade why would most of mw staffers be former mw employees who left that publication at their own will. this is a stupid attempt to start something out of nothing. let's not forget the blade was the only local publication reporting on mw going online without even quoting anyone from mw in their story. i thought cp was the go to when you uncovered that ill attempt but this story makes me think differently of cp as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WardQueen</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687432</link>
		<dc:creator>WardQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687432</guid>
		<description>D,

Getting old has made you bitter...very bitter...have another drink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D,</p>
<p>Getting old has made you bitter...very bitter...have another drink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687429</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687429</guid>
		<description>D,

What kind of an arrogant blowhard insists they know the the person and character of another online poster?

Only one displaying the true height of arrogance, and depth of ingnorance, as you, in my humble opinion.

Shaddup already, you idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D,</p>
<p>What kind of an arrogant blowhard insists they know the the person and character of another online poster?</p>
<p>Only one displaying the true height of arrogance, and depth of ingnorance, as you, in my humble opinion.</p>
<p>Shaddup already, you idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687407</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687407</guid>
		<description>While all of you &quot;kiddies&quot; think you know what you are talking about, I have got news, YOU DON&#039;T.  You have no idea of the &quot;real&quot; history of the Washington Blade.  Most of you are only old enough to remember the last few years.  A bunch of young punks, purporting to have created some kind of journalistic excellence with the &quot;HO RAG&quot; Metro Weekly, the magazine for bar sluts, groupies and druggies.  At least the Blade spent years actually reporting on issues near and dear to the gay community, not just the &quot;fluff&quot; and &quot;glam&quot; that the MW spews.  Of course the younger generations have no idea how pitifully shallow and comical their sense of &quot;cutting edge&quot; is.  It has all been done already, and you are not the trend setters.  That has already been done over and over since the 70&#039;s with the Blade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While all of you "kiddies" think you know what you are talking about, I have got news, YOU DON'T.  You have no idea of the "real" history of the Washington Blade.  Most of you are only old enough to remember the last few years.  A bunch of young punks, purporting to have created some kind of journalistic excellence with the "HO RAG" Metro Weekly, the magazine for bar sluts, groupies and druggies.  At least the Blade spent years actually reporting on issues near and dear to the gay community, not just the "fluff" and "glam" that the MW spews.  Of course the younger generations have no idea how pitifully shallow and comical their sense of "cutting edge" is.  It has all been done already, and you are not the trend setters.  That has already been done over and over since the 70's with the Blade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Al Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687385</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Al Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687385</guid>
		<description>wow - Kavitha Cardoza&#039;s interview with Kevin Naff! The best interview in the history of journalism, or, for that matter, in the history of history.

&amp; yes, jay, GAY PRIDE FOREVER!!! GAY POWER FOREVER!!!  In the communist paradise, of course, gays are valued citizens. The first countries to recognize full rights for gays were socialist countries, e.g., Holland, Sweden, Denmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow - Kavitha Cardoza's interview with Kevin Naff! The best interview in the history of journalism, or, for that matter, in the history of history.</p>
<p>&amp; yes, jay, GAY PRIDE FOREVER!!! GAY POWER FOREVER!!!  In the communist paradise, of course, gays are valued citizens. The first countries to recognize full rights for gays were socialist countries, e.g., Holland, Sweden, Denmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687380</guid>
		<description>Citypaper... You did a piece on the wrong MW statement.  This one is much more wagon circling and disgusting.  Could they have waited at least a couple weeks?  I always preferred MW over the Blade but this is even too much for me.

&quot;At the start of 2009, uncertainty reigned for businesses in Washington area, and recent setbacks have caused new waves of concern about the availability of media to reach the local LGBT market. Throughout the year, Metro Weekly has shared many of those concerns about our economic climate. 

But as we enter the holiday season, our readers and advertisers have made 2009 a successful year -- for both them and us.

Why?

Our rates have remained affordable for local businesses (we have not increased our advertising rates in 3 years).

Our client service has maintained high levels of attentiveness, enthusiasm and cheer.

And, most importantly, our commitment to our community has never wavered.

The readers of Metro Weekly are among the most loyal -- and affluent -- in the Washington metro area and as the holiday season approaches, it&#039;s as important as ever to maintain a consistent advertising presence within the community.

We would like to welcome you to the pages of Metro Weekly with a special introductory offer:

An additional 15% discount on ALL advertising contracts of 7 weeks or more, including our popular Marketplace Advertising.

Value-added web advertising for all 12-week or greater contracts of a 1/3-page size or larger.
With 15 years of service, Metro Weekly is the best avenue for reaching Washington&#039;s gay community.

A 2009 Community Marketing survey of our readership found:

More than 70% make decisions about purchases based on a companies advertising with LGBT media.
More than 60% have taken two or more leisure/vacation trips with hotel stays in the past 12 months.
Seventy-five percent have earned a Bachelor&#039;s, Master&#039;s or Doctoral degree.
Fifty-eight percent have household incomes over $75,000; 42% have household incomes greater than $100,000.
Download a full media kit here.

Call me, Rose Jasienski or Lucas Vu today at 202-638-6830 or email us to make the most of your business in the LGBT community!

We look forward to keeping you connected to the local LGBT community.

Regards,

Randy

--

Randy Shulman
Co-Publisher, Metro Weekly

Part of Washington Life 2009 Power 100 List
CAGLCC&#039;s 2009 Male Business Person of the Year

Direct: 202-527-9624

Metro Weekly
Celebrating 15 Years of Publication
1012 14th Street NW -- Suite 209
Washington, DC 20005

Office: (202) 638-6830
Fax: (202) 638-6831&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citypaper... You did a piece on the wrong MW statement.  This one is much more wagon circling and disgusting.  Could they have waited at least a couple weeks?  I always preferred MW over the Blade but this is even too much for me.</p>
<p>"At the start of 2009, uncertainty reigned for businesses in Washington area, and recent setbacks have caused new waves of concern about the availability of media to reach the local LGBT market. Throughout the year, Metro Weekly has shared many of those concerns about our economic climate. </p>
<p>But as we enter the holiday season, our readers and advertisers have made 2009 a successful year -- for both them and us.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Our rates have remained affordable for local businesses (we have not increased our advertising rates in 3 years).</p>
<p>Our client service has maintained high levels of attentiveness, enthusiasm and cheer.</p>
<p>And, most importantly, our commitment to our community has never wavered.</p>
<p>The readers of Metro Weekly are among the most loyal -- and affluent -- in the Washington metro area and as the holiday season approaches, it's as important as ever to maintain a consistent advertising presence within the community.</p>
<p>We would like to welcome you to the pages of Metro Weekly with a special introductory offer:</p>
<p>An additional 15% discount on ALL advertising contracts of 7 weeks or more, including our popular Marketplace Advertising.</p>
<p>Value-added web advertising for all 12-week or greater contracts of a 1/3-page size or larger.<br />
With 15 years of service, Metro Weekly is the best avenue for reaching Washington's gay community.</p>
<p>A 2009 Community Marketing survey of our readership found:</p>
<p>More than 70% make decisions about purchases based on a companies advertising with LGBT media.<br />
More than 60% have taken two or more leisure/vacation trips with hotel stays in the past 12 months.<br />
Seventy-five percent have earned a Bachelor's, Master's or Doctoral degree.<br />
Fifty-eight percent have household incomes over $75,000; 42% have household incomes greater than $100,000.<br />
Download a full media kit here.</p>
<p>Call me, Rose Jasienski or Lucas Vu today at 202-638-6830 or email us to make the most of your business in the LGBT community!</p>
<p>We look forward to keeping you connected to the local LGBT community.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Randy</p>
<p>--</p>
<p>Randy Shulman<br />
Co-Publisher, Metro Weekly</p>
<p>Part of Washington Life 2009 Power 100 List<br />
CAGLCC's 2009 Male Business Person of the Year</p>
<p>Direct: 202-527-9624</p>
<p>Metro Weekly<br />
Celebrating 15 Years of Publication<br />
1012 14th Street NW -- Suite 209<br />
Washington, DC 20005</p>
<p>Office: (202) 638-6830<br />
Fax: (202) 638-6831"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687377</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Staffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687377</guid>
		<description>The body wasn&#039;t warm?  Did you mean cold?  Cause that is one mixed metaphor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The body wasn't warm?  Did you mean cold?  Cause that is one mixed metaphor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687374</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687374</guid>
		<description>Move along, folks - there is not story here, despite a rather anemic attempt to fabricate one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move along, folks - there is not story here, despite a rather anemic attempt to fabricate one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korrupt</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687373</link>
		<dc:creator>Korrupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Jay.  Both rags are good bird cage liners.  I&#039;ve also used them to wash my windows and as floor cover when painting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with Jay.  Both rags are good bird cage liners.  I've also used them to wash my windows and as floor cover when painting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687286</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687286</guid>
		<description>Angry Al...I knew you would come clean sooner or later!!! Hope to see you at the next march. Are you going to be at City hall Dec. 1 for the historic signing???? Lets do drinks after! GAY POWER NOW!&gt;&gt;&gt;GAY POWER FOREVER!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angry Al...I knew you would come clean sooner or later!!! Hope to see you at the next march. Are you going to be at City hall Dec. 1 for the historic signing???? Lets do drinks after! GAY POWER NOW!&gt;&gt;&gt;GAY POWER FOREVER!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Al Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687280</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Al Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687280</guid>
		<description>I had sex with a metrosexual last night. Does this make me a metropolitan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had sex with a metrosexual last night. Does this make me a metropolitan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/17/metro-weekly-issues-terrible-statement-about-demise-of-washington-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-687206</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=37292#comment-687206</guid>
		<description>Another great City Paper non-story.  Can you guys cover something more interesting than cat fights among your friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great City Paper non-story.  Can you guys cover something more interesting than cat fights among your friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

