<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neighborhood Watch: Grass Not Greener on the Other Side of Park View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:55:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-691177</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-691177</guid>
		<description>You got a really useful blog. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Thanks again, Nicholas Wright @ L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got a really useful blog. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Thanks again, Nicholas Wright @ L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetworthRes</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683997</link>
		<dc:creator>PetworthRes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683997</guid>
		<description>The part of the AFRH that Park View faces hasn&#039;t been on the table for redevelopment...so Park View will continue to view green space. The quesiton is really whether what they are looking at will ever be a park, or whether it will continue to be blocked off by barbed wire from public access. I&#039;d be in strong support of the city trying to buy some of the land from AFRH to create a city park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part of the AFRH that Park View faces hasn't been on the table for redevelopment...so Park View will continue to view green space. The quesiton is really whether what they are looking at will ever be a park, or whether it will continue to be blocked off by barbed wire from public access. I'd be in strong support of the city trying to buy some of the land from AFRH to create a city park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683549</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683549</guid>
		<description>P.S. - didn&#039;t mean to imply sisters shouldn&#039;t apply for construction jobs, but the same critique applies.  Are we qualified?  If not, then it means nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. - didn't mean to imply sisters shouldn't apply for construction jobs, but the same critique applies.  Are we qualified?  If not, then it means nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683544</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683544</guid>
		<description>Sinclair to the rescue!  Love it!

The NCPC did discourage development on the Northwest corner after vigorous public opposision (frankly, i never heard a comment in favor of the development at any meeting).  But the last time I reviewed their minutes, they also approved development of the Southwest corner.

This will never stop until congress or DC steps in and designates (or buys, if DC) the space back for preservation.

I love the obnoxious &quot;our concrete will create jobs for neighborhood residents&quot;... as if we are desperate for low-paying temp construction jobs.  Having lived in the neighborhood for many years, my neighbors are now a thoroughly bourgoiesified/gentrified bunch.  Houses now go for $500-700k.  Very few working-class families remain, given the exploiding tax rates and benefits of cashing out.  I don&#039;t know any neighbors who are looking for a part-time learned trade in the construction industry.  I have one neighbor who owns his own construction business.  

Perhaps some of the few men (there aren&#039;t many) I see in the evenings outside the Park-Morton public-subsidized housing complex might be a better demographic?  But what&#039;s to say they aren&#039;t working already?  I don&#039;t see them during the day.  And what&#039;s to say they are unemployed construction workers?  Not everyone knows how to operate a backhoe, jackhammer, set concrete molds, etc..  

Destroy one of the last native soil parcels in DC... we&#039;ll give you some 6-month long shit jobs.  And traffic and congestion and noise and a whole bunch of nothing.

This and Jim Graham&#039;s damn publically paid-for CVS make me want to spit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinclair to the rescue!  Love it!</p>
<p>The NCPC did discourage development on the Northwest corner after vigorous public opposision (frankly, i never heard a comment in favor of the development at any meeting).  But the last time I reviewed their minutes, they also approved development of the Southwest corner.</p>
<p>This will never stop until congress or DC steps in and designates (or buys, if DC) the space back for preservation.</p>
<p>I love the obnoxious "our concrete will create jobs for neighborhood residents"... as if we are desperate for low-paying temp construction jobs.  Having lived in the neighborhood for many years, my neighbors are now a thoroughly bourgoiesified/gentrified bunch.  Houses now go for $500-700k.  Very few working-class families remain, given the exploiding tax rates and benefits of cashing out.  I don't know any neighbors who are looking for a part-time learned trade in the construction industry.  I have one neighbor who owns his own construction business.  </p>
<p>Perhaps some of the few men (there aren't many) I see in the evenings outside the Park-Morton public-subsidized housing complex might be a better demographic?  But what's to say they aren't working already?  I don't see them during the day.  And what's to say they are unemployed construction workers?  Not everyone knows how to operate a backhoe, jackhammer, set concrete molds, etc..  </p>
<p>Destroy one of the last native soil parcels in DC... we'll give you some 6-month long shit jobs.  And traffic and congestion and noise and a whole bunch of nothing.</p>
<p>This and Jim Graham's damn publically paid-for CVS make me want to spit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blah</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683508</link>
		<dc:creator>Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683508</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t Fenty just funnel millions through various DC agencies to Sinclair Skinner to build a park?  Problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can't Fenty just funnel millions through various DC agencies to Sinclair Skinner to build a park?  Problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blech</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683500</link>
		<dc:creator>Blech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683500</guid>
		<description>Seriously? I already have to stare at that thing like it&#039;s a fucking gated community. Now they&#039;re going to just get rid of the green?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? I already have to stare at that thing like it's a fucking gated community. Now they're going to just get rid of the green?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683283</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683283</guid>
		<description>About that money:  Has anyone actually audited the finances of AFRH? The income from active duty military payroll deductions and fines for bad behavior of same must mean a surge in income. And in a few years, won&#039;t there be more retiring military to pay the rent and fill the beds?  Why do they still need so much money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that money:  Has anyone actually audited the finances of AFRH? The income from active duty military payroll deductions and fines for bad behavior of same must mean a surge in income. And in a few years, won't there be more retiring military to pay the rent and fill the beds?  Why do they still need so much money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/11/12/neighborhood-watch-grass-not-greener-on-the-other-side-of-park-view/comment-page-1/#comment-683202</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=36972#comment-683202</guid>
		<description>You laid out our point of view very well, thanks.  There is one factual error, though: The article states &quot;But now the AFRH is planning to develop the northwest part of the site to increase cash flow&quot;.  NCPC did not approve the plan to develop the northwest corner of the land, only the south east corner, so condos on that property are off the table at this time.  In fact, NCPC required the AFRH to work with the community to asses turning it into a public park again.  They would need NCPC approval first.  A way for them to make money with the current zoning and use of the property would be for a public park leased by DC or NPS or even a conseratory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You laid out our point of view very well, thanks.  There is one factual error, though: The article states "But now the AFRH is planning to develop the northwest part of the site to increase cash flow".  NCPC did not approve the plan to develop the northwest corner of the land, only the south east corner, so condos on that property are off the table at this time.  In fact, NCPC required the AFRH to work with the community to asses turning it into a public park again.  They would need NCPC approval first.  A way for them to make money with the current zoning and use of the property would be for a public park leased by DC or NPS or even a conseratory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

