<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;Improved&#8221; Weather Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-1004338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-1004338</guid>
		<description>I concur Erik.  The old format in my opinion was sufficient to cater to those of us who want it &#039;quick-at-a-glance&#039; to plan for the week.  I&#039;m not against change at all, but now since they (the Post) has discombobulated the part of my brain that the old layout is imprinted; I now have to re-train it to quickly zero in the new layout to glean what I need.  Should take two to three days. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur Erik.  The old format in my opinion was sufficient to cater to those of us who want it 'quick-at-a-glance' to plan for the week.  I'm not against change at all, but now since they (the Post) has discombobulated the part of my brain that the old layout is imprinted; I now have to re-train it to quickly zero in the new layout to glean what I need.  Should take two to three days. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Post Restores Old Weather Scheme - City Desk - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-682549</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Post Restores Old Weather Scheme - City Desk - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-682549</guid>
		<description>[...] the debut of the Post&#8217;s redesigned weather page on the back of the Metro section, we griped to the heavens that it was a huge demotion from the old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the debut of the Post&#8217;s redesigned weather page on the back of the Metro section, we griped to the heavens that it was a huge demotion from the old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 14thStreet</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-671979</link>
		<dc:creator>14thStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-671979</guid>
		<description>Erik, I completely agree with you.  The Sunday print edition is even worse than the picture you show here (they try to fit everything on half a page.)  Bring back the old design!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik, I completely agree with you.  The Sunday print edition is even worse than the picture you show here (they try to fit everything on half a page.)  Bring back the old design!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Seats Daily: Remember When This Was Called &#8216;Redskins Weather&#8217;? - City Desk - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-666174</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Seats Daily: Remember When This Was Called &#8216;Redskins Weather&#8217;? - City Desk - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-666174</guid>
		<description>[...] to stomp on the weather beat that others at City Desk are already covering with gusto. But I&#8217;ll stick to forecasts, and stay away from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to stomp on the weather beat that others at City Desk are already covering with gusto. But I&#8217;ll stick to forecasts, and stay away from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Delaney</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-665813</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-665813</guid>
		<description>The question is, Do I dislike the new format just because I&#039;m used to the old format, or is it really as bad as it seems? 

I fear the worst, my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, Do I dislike the new format just because I'm used to the old format, or is it really as bad as it seems? </p>
<p>I fear the worst, my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Wemple</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-665638</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Wemple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-665638</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much, BobinDC---I was getting killed on this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much, BobinDC---I was getting killed on this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobinDC</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-665622</link>
		<dc:creator>BobinDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-665622</guid>
		<description>I was just thinking the same thing this morning about the new weather page.  My pre-caffiene, pre-shower brain loved the old format.  And the old format had some additional data if you really wanted it, but the focus was the important information in a large, easily readable format.  The new format is too small, too ugly, and too &quot;USA Today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking the same thing this morning about the new weather page.  My pre-caffiene, pre-shower brain loved the old format.  And the old format had some additional data if you really wanted it, but the focus was the important information in a large, easily readable format.  The new format is too small, too ugly, and too "USA Today."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCinDC</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-665610</link>
		<dc:creator>KCinDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-665610</guid>
		<description>Who looks at the printed paper for weather? Do you also use it for stock quotes? How about to see what time it is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who looks at the printed paper for weather? Do you also use it for stock quotes? How about to see what time it is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/10/14/washington-posts-improved-weather-page/comment-page-1/#comment-665600</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=34581#comment-665600</guid>
		<description>What is this &quot;printed page&quot; or &quot;newspaper&quot; thing you&#039;re writing about?  You mean like ink pressed onto some kind of wood product?  I haven&#039;t seen one of those things in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this "printed page" or "newspaper" thing you're writing about?  You mean like ink pressed onto some kind of wood product?  I haven't seen one of those things in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

