Comments on: D.C. Gay Marriage Bill to Be Introduced Tuesday http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/ 68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Mike DeBonis http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-661258 Mike DeBonis Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:16:36 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-661258 Graham was not there. There was an empty seat b/w Catania and Mendo. Graham was not there. There was an empty seat b/w Catania and Mendo.

]]> By: BobinDC http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-661253 BobinDC Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:03:25 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-661253 Yeah, that is the stock photo of Catania that they always use. Yeah, that is the stock photo of Catania that they always use.

]]> By: Thom http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-661028 Thom Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:56:39 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-661028 The Blade has a picture with Graham standing behind David. Of course, with the Blade's all Balto focus they probably used an old photo. The Blade has a picture with Graham standing behind David. Of course, with the Blade's all Balto focus they probably used an old photo.

]]> By: joan http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-660913 joan Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:16:38 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-660913 why wasn't Jim Graham there? It was even held in Ward 1! why wasn't Jim Graham there? It was even held in Ward 1!

]]> By: BobinDC http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-660738 BobinDC Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:11:32 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-660738 Technically, they won't be co-sponsors. They will all be introducing the bill. There are two levels of support for a bill, and introducer is higher than co-sponsor. In addition to your list of media, Metro Weekly was also there. Technically, they won't be co-sponsors. They will all be introducing the bill. There are two levels of support for a bill, and introducer is higher than co-sponsor.

In addition to your list of media, Metro Weekly was also there.

]]> By: Mike DeBonis http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-660692 Mike DeBonis Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:47:27 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-660692 Umm, at a minimum WaPo, Blade, WAMU-FM, DCist were there... Umm, at a minimum WaPo, Blade, WAMU-FM, DCist were there...

]]> By: Charlie http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-660689 Charlie Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:27:59 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/30/d-c-gay-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-tuesday/#comment-660689 Congratulations on a scoop LL. I would have been surprised had this not been announced there. I wonder why there was no other press there (except the Blade). Are they so clueless? Congratulations on a scoop LL. I would have been surprised had this not been announced there. I wonder why there was no other press there (except the Blade). Are they so clueless?

]]>