<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neighborhood Watch: Shaw Residents vs. The Park Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:19:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/comment-page-1/#comment-653383</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31090#comment-653383</guid>
		<description>NPS is probably too busy planning its centennial (http://www.nps.gov/2016/)--in seven years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPS is probably too busy planning its centennial (<a href="http://www.nps.gov/2016/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nps.gov/2016/</a>)--in seven years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niello8</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/comment-page-1/#comment-653367</link>
		<dc:creator>niello8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31090#comment-653367</guid>
		<description>the last meeting they had about it around 2007 or 8 they were talking NINE years for study.  boggling indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the last meeting they had about it around 2007 or 8 they were talking NINE years for study.  boggling indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euclidian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/09/02/neighborhood-watch-shaw-residents-vs-the-park-service/comment-page-1/#comment-653363</link>
		<dc:creator>Euclidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=31090#comment-653363</guid>
		<description>I attended an Shaw Eco Village event in 2001(!) in which a NPS representative claimed they were going to start work on the Woodson house ASAP.  Eight years later, they are talking about a three year planning period?  The mind boggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended an Shaw Eco Village event in 2001(!) in which a NPS representative claimed they were going to start work on the Woodson house ASAP.  Eight years later, they are talking about a three year planning period?  The mind boggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

