That would be assault. I wouldn't mind seeing some Leftists get their teeth knocked out as a result of assaulting someone. Leftist thugs, no wonder they worshiped Stalin.

Wait. No I'm not. I never believed that WF was, for example, a food co-op. Now if the head of a food co-op had written that, I would be kind of mad, and would be inclined to do something about it. But WF is an animal of a different stripe, isn't it? Who is being fooled here? I admit that I am not much of a protester, and God bless those who are, and who make a difference (and thank you), but I do know if this were something to get really fired up about, I would. I just was never fooled into thinking that WF was anything like a food co-op. Yes, maybe he should not have written that, especially in the WSJ.

I don't know. Am I that alienated?

Business 101 people, Business 101.

Furthermore, as a corp that holds themselves up as a paragon of purity and fairness then the fact that they are not supporting reform of the insurance system in this country so that it actually works (versus the f-ed up system our pseudo-free market capitalism has created for it), they open themselves up to this type of boycott.

It all comes down to power in numbers. Just like th eprotestors have power in numbers, America's employers and corporations have power to change things.