<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweeting the Budget: Loose Lips Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vox Populi » Howard sorority sued for $900,000 wax statue of president&#8211;and we&#8217;ve got the picture!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-640270</link>
		<dc:creator>Vox Populi » Howard sorority sued for $900,000 wax statue of president&#8211;and we&#8217;ve got the picture!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=28199#comment-640270</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Loose Lips Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Loose Lips Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweeting the Budget: Loose Lips Daily &#8211; City Desk &#8211; Washington City Paper (Washington City Paper)</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-640091</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweeting the Budget: Loose Lips Daily &#8211; City Desk &#8211; Washington City Paper (Washington City Paper)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=28199#comment-640091</guid>
		<description>[...] Source   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q™</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-640049</link>
		<dc:creator>Q™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=28199#comment-640049</guid>
		<description>&quot;compared the Sixth Street rowhouse to Abu Ghraib&quot; now that&#039;s reaching counselor.  Then again, Abu Ghraib started off as a cover-up too.  As I don&#039;t know the proponderence of the evidence against Jacks, outside of criminal neglect, the Public Defender has a point.

No one wants tax increases, but former LL Silverman is correct.  A modest increase (no more than 0.20), could do wonders.  Granted, this may give the City Council and Mayor more discretionary funds to give away, but there&#039;s only but so much belt-tightening you can do without cutting off circulation.

I&#039;ll wait for Ruth&#039;s opinion on Buzzard Point, but that site is less controversial.  Wouldn&#039;t do anything for Ward 8 though.

Angry Al, all jokes and controveries aside, are you ANGRY at Barry BECAUSE he did &quot;it&quot;, or HOW he did &quot;it&quot;?

&quot;it&quot; = funneling of money to nonprofits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"compared the Sixth Street rowhouse to Abu Ghraib" now that's reaching counselor.  Then again, Abu Ghraib started off as a cover-up too.  As I don't know the proponderence of the evidence against Jacks, outside of criminal neglect, the Public Defender has a point.</p>
<p>No one wants tax increases, but former LL Silverman is correct.  A modest increase (no more than 0.20), could do wonders.  Granted, this may give the City Council and Mayor more discretionary funds to give away, but there's only but so much belt-tightening you can do without cutting off circulation.</p>
<p>I'll wait for Ruth's opinion on Buzzard Point, but that site is less controversial.  Wouldn't do anything for Ward 8 though.</p>
<p>Angry Al, all jokes and controveries aside, are you ANGRY at Barry BECAUSE he did "it", or HOW he did "it"?</p>
<p>"it" = funneling of money to nonprofits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Al Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/28/tweeting-the-budget-loose-lips-daily/comment-page-1/#comment-639989</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Al Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=28199#comment-639989</guid>
		<description>The key to today&#039;s Post story is that Richardson is blaming James Bunn for the &quot;forgeries&quot; in the corporate documents.  Richardson&#039;s attorney said she had nothing to do with the &quot;forgeries&quot; on the incorporation papers.

So we have Barry blaming everyone else, including those who worked for him.  Richardson is blaming James Bunn.  Who will James Bunn blames?  

Who will be the last of these thieves to try to throw their co-conspirators under the bus?  Who will be the last to go to the US Attorney &amp; so get stuck with the lion&#039;s share of the blame &amp; prison time?

Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to today's Post story is that Richardson is blaming James Bunn for the "forgeries" in the corporate documents.  Richardson's attorney said she had nothing to do with the "forgeries" on the incorporation papers.</p>
<p>So we have Barry blaming everyone else, including those who worked for him.  Richardson is blaming James Bunn.  Who will James Bunn blames?  </p>
<p>Who will be the last of these thieves to try to throw their co-conspirators under the bus?  Who will be the last to go to the US Attorney &amp; so get stuck with the lion's share of the blame &amp; prison time?</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

