<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Newspapers, Conflicts of Interest Have Always Been a Sporting Proposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/02/for-newspapers-conflicts-of-interest-have-always-been-a-sporting-proposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/02/for-newspapers-conflicts-of-interest-have-always-been-a-sporting-proposition/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:44:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave McKenna</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/02/for-newspapers-conflicts-of-interest-have-always-been-a-sporting-proposition/comment-page-1/#comment-621719</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=26363#comment-621719</guid>
		<description>Gray: You had me at &quot;uh&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gray: You had me at "uh"...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/02/for-newspapers-conflicts-of-interest-have-always-been-a-sporting-proposition/comment-page-1/#comment-621682</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=26363#comment-621682</guid>
		<description>Uh, excuse me pls, but you totally miss the big difference: These weren&#039;t intended to be &quot;official&quot; events with guest and sponsors known to the public. These &quot;salons&quot; were deliberately designed as &quot;off the record&quot; meetings, with thinly veiled promises to be able to influence legislation and reporting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, excuse me pls, but you totally miss the big difference: These weren't intended to be "official" events with guest and sponsors known to the public. These "salons" were deliberately designed as "off the record" meetings, with thinly veiled promises to be able to influence legislation and reporting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
