Comments on: Goodbye, Mother Harriette: Loose Lips Daily

By: Mike DeBonis

Mike DeBonis — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:38:13 +0000

It was directed to the judge, in the course of explaining how she was the only person who could help the District government fix what needed fixing.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:28:24 +0000

So she was saying that if she was allowed to go back to her old job she could embezzle more money? Huh? Who was this comment directed towards?

By: Mike DeBonis

Mike DeBonis — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:34:23 +0000

Office of Tax and Revenue

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:51:44 +0000

I didn't understand that quote from Walters about getting people a check. Who was she talking to? Where is the "there" she was referring to? Jail? The DC Tax Office?

By: Q

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:40 +0000

Suing Bank of America...C'mon. That is REACHING Mr. AG. So BoA is liable and should've been watching monies that a DC Official was duly sworn to dissiminate (albeit illegally, but she was still able to do it). Sue the Suntrust Teller for not discovering the inconsistencies sooner. Why not sue OTC as well, for negligence. Sue the Bic, Pilot, etc. company for making the ink that was used to endorse the checks. LL, the Taxi link doesn't work. However, the WaPo commentor is wrong on this issue. I won't comment in detail but the medallion program won't ensure knowledge of the city or updated cars any more than the current system does. One note however, DC Taxicabs MUST be inspected every six months. If you are found hacking on a dead inspection sticker, you can face high fines. Now if the city can get more Hack inspectors out, then we can see how well this is enforced.