Comments on: WaPo Stepping Up Coverage of Weddings

By: marybindc

marybindc — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:26:46 +0000

SPORTS PAGE FOR WOMEN?? Is this serious? This is what the Post thinks of me??

Grrrr.

By: Angry Al Gonzales

Angry Al Gonzales — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:54:44 +0000

OK - if they cover the renegade Mormon marriages of 60 year old men & 14 year old girls as a fifth wives, & the Moslems who take five wives. Otherwise, who cares. It's just more masturbation disguised as news.
Man bites dog is news. Dog bites man? No, not news.

By: Jule Banville

Jule Banville — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:27:25 +0000

Yeah, I want some wedding agate.

By: Molly Redden

Molly Redden — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:11:34 +0000

I expect box scores, and player stats if it's not their first wedding.

By: Amanda Hess

Amanda Hess — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:43:52 +0000

Weddings are "the Sports page for women," because real sports are not for women. No, women keep score in life by meticulously calibrating size of cake / success of fiancee / gold leaf on invitations.

Who needs a business section when you've got an interactive local wedding feature?