City Desk

Dysfunction Junction? Or Part of Snyderatto’s Plan?

So Jason Taylor gets cut or otherwise dances out of town after a partial season with the Redskins.

Vinny Cerrato traded two draft picks for Taylor last year.

Now there's a big whole hole at defensive end. Again.

But which was the worse move: Trading for Taylor, or cutting him?

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Comments

  1. #1

    "Now there's a big whole at defensive end."

    Does this mean the lack of a DE makes the Skins a more complete team? That the absence of a defender makes for a more effective defense? Are you saying that nothingness, in itself, is wholeness?

    Wow... very zen, McK. Very zen.

  2. #2

    Jason Taylor leaving doesn't really leave a hole as they were the #4 Defense last year and he had very little if anything to do with it.

  3. #3

    Now they've got 8.5 million in additional cap space!

    It was a good move then and a good move now. At the time they traded for him they had 2 DE go down with season ending injuries.

    Him getting his calf stomped was a freak injury...it is what it was.

  4. #4

    Dave:
    dang! in your honor, i'll correct it to just plain "hole," as in "a-hole"...this stuff didn't happen before the Washington Post cut back on the copy editing staff!
    Mike C.:
    interesting thoughts about the salary cap. i, however, contend that snyder's actions in every preseason since 2000 leave two possibilities:
    1)it's a myth that Snyder spends more than other owners, and in reality he spends the same as everybody else, since the only reason to have a salary cap is to make sure everybody spends the same amount, but snyder's myth is a result of him just spending his money more loudly than other owners. Or,
    2)the salary cap is a myth, which is what i believe, since far as i can remember only one team has ever been sanctioned for violating the cap rules. and every story i've ever read about what snyder's"capologist" does just seems like so much hokum...

Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.