City Desk

WaPo: No More “Freelance” Pay for Staffers

The belt keeps tightening around the newsroom budget of the Washington Post. Following a stretch that featured the killing of the Sunday Source and Book World, newsroom administration on Tuesday announced perhaps a bigger no-brainer: Staffers at the paper will no longer get paid extra for doing chats and blogs on

Thus comes to a halt one of the industry's most luxurious gravy trains. Several years ago, when the Post started launching blogs like bottle rockets, a two-caste compensation system evolved. Big stars, like Marc Fisher and Joel Achenbach, got paid. Grunts on the Metro desk and elswhere didn't.

Longtime staffer Achenbach, writer of the Post’s Achenblog, told the Washington City Paper in 2006, “I get some compensation for the blog, and I certainly hope they have a system that’s fair to everyone.”

At that time, fairness would have required paying the nonstars for their blogging contributions, and the paper—even in those pre-worst-financial-crisis-since-whenever times—wasn't going to heave the sod to level this particular playing field. Nowadays, fairness at the Post is achieved the same way it's happening across the industry. By slashing everything, that is.

The cost-saving edict will fall hard on newsroom vets who participate in regular chats on The going price for such contributions is $100 per session, so a weekly chatter could expect about $5,000 in extra earnings per year. Pure gravy there–chats are done during business hours, and they often help reporters develop sources and story ideas. That the paper has paid extra for this stuff is a great tribute to its once-freewheeling approach to journalism.

Says Paul Farhi, a Style staffer who has long cranked out chats for the site: "I love doing my weekly chat. I've said all along that I'd do it even if they didn't pay me for it. And now it looks like I'm about to get my wish."

The no-pay policy also applies to the contributions of Web staff to the paper–whereas these folks formerly got paid freelance wages for their dead-tree work, now they'll get nothing. Or, perhaps more likely, they just won't contribute anymore.

Below, the memo, complete with interruptions.

To: Newsroom Staffs
From: Shirley Carswell

As we fully integrate the web and print newsrooms and reach our readers through print and online, our system of making “freelance” payments to newspaper staff for regular chats and blogs and to staff for occasional stories in the paper is no longer practical.

How about a shorter, truer version: We can no longer afford to make extra payments to our staffers for their contributions to the paper or the Web site.

Effective immediately, such payments to employees of Washington Post Media will end.


For special work done on your own time, please speak to the assigning editor in advance about compensation.

And be prepared for your assigning editor to look at you like you're crazy.

If you have questions about this change, please contact your supervisor. Thanks for your understanding as we work through this integration.

In other words, don't bother complaining.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • WoodwardByProxy

    Awwwwwwwwwwww. Paw wil' Ewik. All these years, and all thios attention-seeking. And STILL! No one takes him seriously as a supposed "journalist." So the poor untalented sod copes by mocking actual journalists and the real newspapers who pay them. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!


  • Fred

    I never read Achenblog or his column. To me, he's got very little that is original to say. I read Marc just because he talks about local issues.

    But the chats are really useful.

  • Pingback: DMV Links: Goodbye Manny, Hello Dunn? | Mr. Irrelevant

  • Stunned

    I cannot believe the Post paid extra for that stuff. Any work you do for your employer is part of your pay. In this day and age of employees being asked to do more and more work (often work that isn't even part of their job descriptions), it doesn't make sense financially to have paid people for that extra work. I don't get paid extra when I write for my publication's blog.

    On the bright side, for the Post: At least they have a lot of fat they can trim to save money....

  • J

    What will they trim next? I can get through a sunday post in 20 minutes. It used to be an afternoon affair. Sadly its not going to be a viable product soon.

  • Pingback: Washington Post Writers Lose Blog and Chat Swag? | Stet Sports Blog

  • andreawoodlley

    The Post is choking and going down, but trust me the clowns at the top are still raking in the ridiculous bucks. The Magazine which is already skimpy and stupidly underfed was directed by Wemouth to slash its budget. First thing they did was cut the XX files freelancers in 1/2. Bloggers too, of course. Good luck with all that genius cost cutting. It does not seem to be improving the product --at all.

  • A

    I second everything Stunned said. People should be paid a salary that covers any extra work they are asked to do - and I suspect that's already the case at the WP. In which case, those grumbling about losing extra pay are so caught up in keeping the riffraff out of their first-class cabins that they fail to see the ship heading toward the iceberg.

  • Pingback: The end of pay-per-blog kickbacks at the Washington Post | MoJo DoJo

  • Alviso