<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Morning Roundup: Choice Is so Overrated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:26:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Atwood Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-431709</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Atwood Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-431709</guid>
		<description>I agree, the use of strikeouts in this article is confusing. The &#039;joke&#039; use at the top sets up the wrong expectation for the &#039;correction&#039; use below. Either the &#039;joke&#039; should be changed to something like &quot;big brother, err... the Dept. of Homeland security&quot; or the correction should simply be made and then acknowledged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the use of strikeouts in this article is confusing. The 'joke' use at the top sets up the wrong expectation for the 'correction' use below. Either the 'joke' should be changed to something like "big brother, err... the Dept. of Homeland security" or the correction should simply be made and then acknowledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creativemeat</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430708</link>
		<dc:creator>creativemeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just saying, do we have to know you made a mistake/correction? 

I&#039;m alright with using strikeouts for jokes as long as we leave the option of strikeouts for strikeout jokes that are unfunny. Is that even possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm just saying, do we have to know you made a mistake/correction? </p>
<p>I'm alright with using strikeouts for jokes as long as we leave the option of strikeouts for strikeout jokes that are unfunny. Is that even possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430517</guid>
		<description>@creativemeat: Is seeing strikeouts used for two separate purposes confusing? Should I stick with one version over the other? Should I have deleted the erroneous information and posted a correction in an italicized update at the bottom of the post? 

I&#039;m totally open to suggestions on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@creativemeat: Is seeing strikeouts used for two separate purposes confusing? Should I stick with one version over the other? Should I have deleted the erroneous information and posted a correction in an italicized update at the bottom of the post? </p>
<p>I'm totally open to suggestions on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creativemeat</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430498</link>
		<dc:creator>creativemeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430498</guid>
		<description>When did strikeouts become some ethical form of transparency? And now we use them for jokes? Cmon mikey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did strikeouts become some ethical form of transparency? And now we use them for jokes? Cmon mikey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430443</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430443</guid>
		<description>Np</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Np</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430401</guid>
		<description>Thnx Dave. Corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thnx Dave. Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/01/09/our-morning-roundup-choice-is-so-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-430380</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=13221#comment-430380</guid>
		<description>LibTav (as the kids are calling it these days) has been smoke-free since it opened in Apr. of 2007. Get yr facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LibTav (as the kids are calling it these days) has been smoke-free since it opened in Apr. of 2007. Get yr facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
