<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Ombudsman Deborah Howell: Taking a Shortcut?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:41:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/comment-page-1/#comment-394991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10597#comment-394991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious: Now that you&#039;ve had a chance to read the Deborah Howell column, Mr. Wemple, who do you think took the more egregious shortcut? The ombudsman looking for advice from reporters or you in posting her e-mail and calling it her taking a shortcut?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious: Now that you've had a chance to read the Deborah Howell column, Mr. Wemple, who do you think took the more egregious shortcut? The ombudsman looking for advice from reporters or you in posting her e-mail and calling it her taking a shortcut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefrontpage</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/comment-page-1/#comment-392539</link>
		<dc:creator>thefrontpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10597#comment-392539</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not a shortcut--that&#039;s reporting. When you report, you ask people for input. Any reporter, author, writer, researcher, does exactly what Deborah is doing. It&#039;s called reporting. It is not a short-cut. You owe Deborah, who is a very good Ombudsman, an apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's not a shortcut--that's reporting. When you report, you ask people for input. Any reporter, author, writer, researcher, does exactly what Deborah is doing. It's called reporting. It is not a short-cut. You owe Deborah, who is a very good Ombudsman, an apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/comment-page-1/#comment-392232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10597#comment-392232</guid>
		<description>You should care about it, Dave, because it shows just how much more petty the City Paper becomes with each passing day. Instead of maybe waiting on the ombudsman column to come out, Wemple would rather assume that Howell is taking a shortcut. Instead of trying to find out how often Howell asks her newsroom colleagues for input on her column (probably quite often, considering what she writes about), the City Paper would rather pat themselves on the back for this &quot;scoop.&quot; It&#039;s kind of sad. Especially considering the shortcuts that appear on this blog every day. Including this silly post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should care about it, Dave, because it shows just how much more petty the City Paper becomes with each passing day. Instead of maybe waiting on the ombudsman column to come out, Wemple would rather assume that Howell is taking a shortcut. Instead of trying to find out how often Howell asks her newsroom colleagues for input on her column (probably quite often, considering what she writes about), the City Paper would rather pat themselves on the back for this "scoop." It's kind of sad. Especially considering the shortcuts that appear on this blog every day. Including this silly post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/19/washington-post-ombudsman-deborah-howell-taking-a-shortcut/comment-page-1/#comment-392226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=10597#comment-392226</guid>
		<description>And I should care about this because...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I should care about this because...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

