Panel Rejects Lottery Contract Appeal
After all that election excitement, it's back to our regularly scheduled LL programming...like the lottery contract.
In a decision released Monday, an administrative law judge ruled that a challenge to the new D.C. lottery contract is not valid.
The challenge, filed by old contract holder Lottery Technology Enterprises, held that the new contract submission, by W2I, was misjudged by the Office of the Chief Financial Officer. The contract, caught in the middle of a political pissing match of epic proportions, has yet to be approved by the council.
Judge Jonathan D. Zischkau, with a colleague on the Contract Appeals Board concurring, ruled that LTE's arguments either weren't legally "timely" or did not have merit. Here's the full opinion [PDF].
So goes Vincent C. Gray and the council's last legitimate excuse for not acting on the proposal. Problem is, the latest contract submission ran out of time yet again last week. Will Mayor Adrian M. Fenty resubmit it---again?
Comments
Leave a Reply
You can follow any responses to this entry through its comments RSS feed.
Blogs Linking to this Article
-
Linked From: November 6th, 2008Washington City Paper: City Desk - Loose Lips Daily
10:38 am[...] IN CASE YOU MISSED IT—DCision ‘08: The LL Postmortem; ANC 2C: Free at Last!; Panel Rejects Lottery Contract Appeal [...]
-
Linked From: November 7th, 2008Washington City Paper: City Desk - LTE to Appeal Lottery Contract Decision
2:22 pm[...] this week, LL first reported, the city’s Contract Appeals Board ruled that the Office of the Chief Financial Officer had [...]





