<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Commissary Responds to Sietsema&#8217;s First Bites Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:34:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perrita anal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-499673</link>
		<dc:creator>perrita anal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-499673</guid>
		<description>I liked the post and your writing style. I&#039;m adding you to my RSS reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the post and your writing style. I&#8217;m adding you to my RSS reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New column for Columbia Journalism Review Daily : CRAIG SILVERMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-399522</link>
		<dc:creator>New column for Columbia Journalism Review Daily : CRAIG SILVERMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-399522</guid>
		<description>[...] quote was attributed to a Post editor in an e-mail published by the Washington City Paper this week. The email was written by David Winer, the managing partner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quote was attributed to a Post editor in an e-mail published by the Washington City Paper this week. The email was written by David Winer, the managing partner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington City Paper: City Desk - Landrum to Sietsema: You Could Have At Least Called</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-377642</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington City Paper: City Desk - Landrum to Sietsema: You Could Have At Least Called</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-377642</guid>
		<description>[...] Burgers, to post this love note to Tom Sietsema after the Washington Post critic&#8217;s recent dust-up over a First Bite review of the Commissary: The one thing that doesn&#8217;t make sense to me about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Burgers, to post this love note to Tom Sietsema after the Washington Post critic&#8217;s recent dust-up over a First Bite review of the Commissary: The one thing that doesn&#8217;t make sense to me about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brigid quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-377467</link>
		<dc:creator>brigid quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-377467</guid>
		<description>looking at the tenor of the responses here, it seems to me that sietsema rallied his friends to come to his defense...when no defense is warranted.  in my view, his failures to pass on reviewing the restaurant and disclose to his editors a close personal relationship with an owner (whether ending well or not) brings into serious question his judgment and journalistic integrity and thus the ability of readers to trust his work.  when a journalist loses the trust of readers, the publication for which he/she works should look very closely at how that reflects on its overall reputation and do what it takes to protect it.  is deleting the column from the the post&#039;s web site really enough to regain the trust of readers?  i don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking at the tenor of the responses here, it seems to me that sietsema rallied his friends to come to his defense&#8230;when no defense is warranted.  in my view, his failures to pass on reviewing the restaurant and disclose to his editors a close personal relationship with an owner (whether ending well or not) brings into serious question his judgment and journalistic integrity and thus the ability of readers to trust his work.  when a journalist loses the trust of readers, the publication for which he/she works should look very closely at how that reflects on its overall reputation and do what it takes to protect it.  is deleting the column from the the post&#8217;s web site really enough to regain the trust of readers?  i don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen bach</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-377271</link>
		<dc:creator>helen bach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-377271</guid>
		<description>I heard tom was short in a certain department</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard tom was short in a certain department</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doral chenoweth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376280</link>
		<dc:creator>doral chenoweth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376280</guid>
		<description>City Desk:  Feel free to run my website as it directly relates to the Sietsema issue. For starters the Post must not have an ink-on-pulp policy specifically for restaurant critics. In my life and career the Post&#039;s Phyllis Richman would never be involved in such a circumstance.

My editors at The Columbus Dispatch merely had to tell me one time: Memorize the decision in Sullivan vs New York Times. That lesson came home to me when I reviewed an eatery owned by one Mark Pi. He became upset when in an otherwise favorable review I dared to note that he was serving &quot;instant Peking duck&quot; because it was ready, as my server advised, in &quot;twenty minute, twenty minute.&quot; Pi wanted me replaced. The then editor Luke Feck penciled a note to me and placed it in my then cloak room mailbox:

&quot;Pi are not square;
Pi are pissed.&quot;

Message loud and clear. I managed over the next 25 years to find soy solace elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City Desk:  Feel free to run my website as it directly relates to the Sietsema issue. For starters the Post must not have an ink-on-pulp policy specifically for restaurant critics. In my life and career the Post&#8217;s Phyllis Richman would never be involved in such a circumstance.</p>
<p>My editors at The Columbus Dispatch merely had to tell me one time: Memorize the decision in Sullivan vs New York Times. That lesson came home to me when I reviewed an eatery owned by one Mark Pi. He became upset when in an otherwise favorable review I dared to note that he was serving &#8220;instant Peking duck&#8221; because it was ready, as my server advised, in &#8220;twenty minute, twenty minute.&#8221; Pi wanted me replaced. The then editor Luke Feck penciled a note to me and placed it in my then cloak room mailbox:</p>
<p>&#8220;Pi are not square;<br />
Pi are pissed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Message loud and clear. I managed over the next 25 years to find soy solace elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doral chenoweth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376260</link>
		<dc:creator>doral chenoweth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376260</guid>
		<description>City Desk:  Feel free to run the above website...advise all to click onto the HOME page, then a second click on to ETHICS under the general topic of TOPICS.
www.grumpygourmetusa.com

All of my editors at The Columbus Dispatch had one firm golden rule: Memorize the decision of Sullivan vs New York Times. When I reviewed an eatery owned by one Mark Pi, I offended him by inferring he was serving &quot;instant Peking duck&quot; because I didn&#039;t have to wait 24 hours. Pi than approached my editor du jour to have me replaced. Editor Luke Feck left this writ-by-pencil note in my mail box: Pi are not square; Pi are pissed. 

Regardless of how one reads that, his message to me was to pass on any future reviews of Pi-owned restaurants.
I managed to spend more than 25 years following his advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City Desk:  Feel free to run the above website&#8230;advise all to click onto the HOME page, then a second click on to ETHICS under the general topic of TOPICS.<br />
<a href="http://www.grumpygourmetusa.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.grumpygourmetusa.com</a></p>
<p>All of my editors at The Columbus Dispatch had one firm golden rule: Memorize the decision of Sullivan vs New York Times. When I reviewed an eatery owned by one Mark Pi, I offended him by inferring he was serving &#8220;instant Peking duck&#8221; because I didn&#8217;t have to wait 24 hours. Pi than approached my editor du jour to have me replaced. Editor Luke Feck left this writ-by-pencil note in my mail box: Pi are not square; Pi are pissed. </p>
<p>Regardless of how one reads that, his message to me was to pass on any future reviews of Pi-owned restaurants.<br />
I managed to spend more than 25 years following his advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington City Paper: City Desk - Post Clarifies Its Position on Future EatWell DC Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376149</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington City Paper: City Desk - Post Clarifies Its Position on Future EatWell DC Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376149</guid>
		<description>[...] critic Tom Sietsema&#8217;s hard, pipe-hitting First Bite commentary on the Commissary, which the Post has since retracted and pulled from its Web site. (The review is still available [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] critic Tom Sietsema&#8217;s hard, pipe-hitting First Bite commentary on the Commissary, which the Post has since retracted and pulled from its Web site. (The review is still available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleonora D'Arborea</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376147</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleonora D'Arborea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376147</guid>
		<description>1.  The review was not vitriolic.  He didn&#039;t make personal attacks or use inappropriate language.  He basically said the food at Commissary is bad.  

2.  Neighborhood place or not, many if not most people who read restaurant reviews do so because they are deciding where to &#039;invest&#039; their dining dollars.  Before I drop $30 or whatever at a neighborhood place (whatever that means - Komi is in the same neighborhood, as is Popeyes) I appreciate someone who tells me that the chef goes heavy on the salt or tends to make sauces too sweet or that my money would be better spent elsewhere.  

Megan, in case you didn&#039;t notice - its not &quot;only a meal.&quot;  Its a meal you spend money on, money you might have spent elsewhere, perhaps at a competing neighborhood place that puts more effort into getting food right.   And it should be needless to say, but - since Sietsema was not caught taking a bribe, there is no reason to act as though he had taken a bribe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  The review was not vitriolic.  He didn&#8217;t make personal attacks or use inappropriate language.  He basically said the food at Commissary is bad.  </p>
<p>2.  Neighborhood place or not, many if not most people who read restaurant reviews do so because they are deciding where to &#8216;invest&#8217; their dining dollars.  Before I drop $30 or whatever at a neighborhood place (whatever that means &#8211; Komi is in the same neighborhood, as is Popeyes) I appreciate someone who tells me that the chef goes heavy on the salt or tends to make sauces too sweet or that my money would be better spent elsewhere.  </p>
<p>Megan, in case you didn&#8217;t notice &#8211; its not &#8220;only a meal.&#8221;  Its a meal you spend money on, money you might have spent elsewhere, perhaps at a competing neighborhood place that puts more effort into getting food right.   And it should be needless to say, but &#8211; since Sietsema was not caught taking a bribe, there is no reason to act as though he had taken a bribe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Shire</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376105</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Shire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376105</guid>
		<description>So much anger? It&#039;s only a meal. We all eat them 3 times a day.This is only a little neighborhood spot, not Citronel.
The question here is not about the food, who&#039;s wrong or right; it&#039;s about ethics and integrity. If Sietsema were caught taking a bribe, none of you would defend your friend. You&#039;d be certain his opinion was slanted. He got caught. The reveiew should not have been written, that&#039;s clear. Winer pointed it out. Sietsema agreed; he apologized for not recusing and his bosses and editor&#039;s agreed, &quot;we regret&quot;. Instead of defending the man, you should be sdmonishing him. How have our societal standards dropped so low that we believe in defending a, self admitted, guilty party to the point of exoneration?

Sietsema acted like a bully, he was wrong to write the story, his bosses agreed and so should all of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much anger? It&#8217;s only a meal. We all eat them 3 times a day.This is only a little neighborhood spot, not Citronel.<br />
The question here is not about the food, who&#8217;s wrong or right; it&#8217;s about ethics and integrity. If Sietsema were caught taking a bribe, none of you would defend your friend. You&#8217;d be certain his opinion was slanted. He got caught. The reveiew should not have been written, that&#8217;s clear. Winer pointed it out. Sietsema agreed; he apologized for not recusing and his bosses and editor&#8217;s agreed, &#8220;we regret&#8221;. Instead of defending the man, you should be sdmonishing him. How have our societal standards dropped so low that we believe in defending a, self admitted, guilty party to the point of exoneration?</p>
<p>Sietsema acted like a bully, he was wrong to write the story, his bosses agreed and so should all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jammmick</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376092</link>
		<dc:creator>jammmick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376092</guid>
		<description>I very seriously doubt that the Post agreed never to review another EatWell restaurant. Why would it? There was no legal issue here, no serious threat of a lawsuit. Just, at least in perception, a biased reporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very seriously doubt that the Post agreed never to review another EatWell restaurant. Why would it? There was no legal issue here, no serious threat of a lawsuit. Just, at least in perception, a biased reporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WashPost dining critic scolded for ethics lapse - Steve Barnes - Albany NY Restaurants and Dining Blog - Table Hopping - timesunion.com</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-376087</link>
		<dc:creator>WashPost dining critic scolded for ethics lapse - Steve Barnes - Albany NY Restaurants and Dining Blog - Table Hopping - timesunion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-376087</guid>
		<description>[...] more here from a DC alternaweekly. One startling concession on the paper&#8217;s part: neither Mr. Sietsema [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here from a DC alternaweekly. One startling concession on the paper&#8217;s part: neither Mr. Sietsema [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-375993</link>
		<dc:creator>al gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-375993</guid>
		<description>This restaurant is an over-priced dump, as are the others owned by Mr Whiner.  Good for Tom S to expose this punk.
As for no reviews from the Post, great.  Anyone in the restaurant business knows that business spikes for weeks after a review appears in the Post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This restaurant is an over-priced dump, as are the others owned by Mr Whiner.  Good for Tom S to expose this punk.<br />
As for no reviews from the Post, great.  Anyone in the restaurant business knows that business spikes for weeks after a review appears in the Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-375640</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-375640</guid>
		<description>The Post will likely hire freelance writers to cover EatWell restaurants as the need arises.  Problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Post will likely hire freelance writers to cover EatWell restaurants as the need arises.  Problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/11/03/the-commissary-responds-to-sietsemas-first-bites-review/comment-page-1/#comment-375601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=8651#comment-375601</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute.  In response to a complaint, the Washington Post editors promised to NEVER write a review of a restaurant owned by EatWell DC?  Even if one of EatWell&#039;s restaurants becomes the hottest place in town (or a danger to the health and safety of the dining public)?  How on earth can they ethically justify that decision.  Have they made that promise to other restaurants (or to developers or to politicians)? Any newspaper that lets complaints from local business owners rule out future coverage of that business is abdicating its responsibility to us, its readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute.  In response to a complaint, the Washington Post editors promised to NEVER write a review of a restaurant owned by EatWell DC?  Even if one of EatWell&#8217;s restaurants becomes the hottest place in town (or a danger to the health and safety of the dining public)?  How on earth can they ethically justify that decision.  Have they made that promise to other restaurants (or to developers or to politicians)? Any newspaper that lets complaints from local business owners rule out future coverage of that business is abdicating its responsibility to us, its readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
