Comments on: More on the Supermarket Poll

By: Babs

Babs — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:40:44 +0000

By the time Attorney's go through her votes with a strong tooth pick comb, she won't win. How in the world can she have a meeting with the Board of Elections and Ethics which she has perview over and no other people to contest the outcome present. Talk about corruption at it's highest level, write her name any kind of way, please get real, this will definately become a scandal. Not to worry there is not a Judge in Washington that will let this happen.

By: Washington City Paper: City Desk - Loose Lips Daily

Washington City Paper: City Desk - Loose Lips Daily — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:28:45 +0000

[...] IN CASE YOU MISSED IT—”Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Counting Write-In Votes in the District of Columbia“: “Simply writing in ‘Carol,’ the board will count as a vote for Schwartz….Also likely to be judged valid are various mispellings of Schwartz, such as ‘Shwartz,’ ‘Schwarts,’ ‘Schwarz,’ or variations thereof”; “More on the Supermarket Poll” [...]

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:16:18 +0000

Also I believe from voting trends that the Ward 3 Vote is off. Kwame does not run well in Ward 3 however this shows him winning the Ward which is a Schwartz stronghold

By: GayInDC

GayInDC — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:26:57 +0000

Survey was mostly done prior to Mara getting the Post endorsement. Kind of a big thing to overlook.

By: Arthur Delaney

Arthur Delaney — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:13:02 +0000

Go Carol!

By: Reid

Reid — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:12:55 +0000

For what it's worth, that survey is overrepresentative of the Black and women's vote. Not sure if that skews to numbers to Brown or Schwartz or neither.