To Flaunt, or Not to Flaunt: Big Bucks?
Al Tompkins of Tampa's Poynter Institute posted an article this morning about the lengths a candidate will go to characterize his childhood as poverty-stricken:
Looking over the main speeches of the DNC, I have been amused/amazed by how often speakers have referred to their penniless humble roots, as if that makes them more like the rest of us....
It is a refrain of the old American Dream/Rags to Riches notion. Except today's politician doesn't want anything to do with claiming they are rich.
Tompkins goes on to argue that candidates should emphasize their wealth, because who wants a bankrupt clown in the Oval Office? I think he's right on with his assessment. I wouldn't trust a schizophrenic to assess my mental health, why would I choose for a lead role in our current economic tragedy someone who's barely getting by over someone who knows how to make and invest big bucks ?
But I can understand why politicians are reluctant to play up their 4br/3ba summer homes. One, it might irritate the egos of that super-sensitive middle class: "He doesn't know how much gas costs? Who doesn't know that? It costs a lot. Why the hell does he go and admit that? I don't even want to hear from this guy about energy policy."
And two, it seems that every election cycle provides a vindication of those secret jealousies in the form of a media slew lambasting the wealthier politician for being "out of touch with the real America." Examples include attacks on John Kerry and his wife's ketchup fortune, and--for us Gen Yers--'90s Nickelodeon caricatures of Ross Perot squeaking out campaign slogans while shoving money down the front of his pants.
Oddly enough, we usually elect the rich folk no matter what they say about their income--if they say anything at all: "U.S. Senators are worth, on average, more than $10 million. Their colleagues in the House average personal wealth of more than $5 million."
Whodathunkit?
Comments
Leave a Reply
You can follow any responses to this entry through its comments RSS feed.
3:16 pm
They will emphasize anything to have themselves elected. I’m surprised this electoral farce is being taken by so many so seriously. Because it shouldn’t, unless lucrative jobs with a new administration to be had, that is. I’m also (pleasantly) surprised every time a Ger Yer writer manages NOT to mention his/her girl/boy friend in ten sentences. In fact, I’m all astonishment.
12:07 pm
In the case of one of the national candidates, Democratic VP pick Joe Biden, choosing whether or not to flaunt wealth isn't an option-as of 2006, he was $12,000 in debt and had no net worth, making him the poorest member of the US Senate.
Some people choose career paths that they know will net them less cash than others; I don't think it says anything negative about their views on macroeconomics. And I sure as hell wouldn't want to see our government handled by those rich entrepreneurs who hock books on late-night infomercials.
4:17 am
Hi meticulous post. I think these angles might be utilizable overly. Now the solid pick up notes are the ones that lighter the woman. Now one of the lines might just be in all genuine fun to help break the ice. That is great and it can at long last lead to landing up in sleep together with her at the end of the night. Heck what man doesn't want that, but familiar what to articulate and how to pull it off can demand a bit of employ. A good pick up note will have you in the door but from there you have to be assured enough to maintain the conversation running.