<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adbusters Hates on Hipsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/</link>
	<description>&#60;em&#62;City Paper&#60;/em&#62; Writers on News, Politics, the Media, the Arts, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-223790</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-223790</guid>
		<description>"I think some dude named Bret Easton Ellis scooped Adbusters on this. Like, in the 1980s."

And before that it was Waugh with Vile Bodies, and before that it was some other schoolmarm, and another, and another, going all the way back to Moses himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think some dude named Bret Easton Ellis scooped Adbusters on this. Like, in the 1980s.&#8221;</p>
<p>And before that it was Waugh with Vile Bodies, and before that it was some other schoolmarm, and another, and another, going all the way back to Moses himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-223049</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-223049</guid>
		<description>Yesterday I had to remind a kid who claimed that despite all the doom and gloom over the economy that nothing bad is really going to happen, that in fact, the 1966 Watts Riots, 1967 Newark Riots and 1968 Riots were generally about economic problems in only small parts of urban cities and yet people died.  He claimed that he was unaware that the riots destroyed property. Seriously.  This article is equally ignorant of history and society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I had to remind a kid who claimed that despite all the doom and gloom over the economy that nothing bad is really going to happen, that in fact, the 1966 Watts Riots, 1967 Newark Riots and 1968 Riots were generally about economic problems in only small parts of urban cities and yet people died.  He claimed that he was unaware that the riots destroyed property. Seriously.  This article is equally ignorant of history and society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Scheinman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Scheinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222970</guid>
		<description>Youth subculture mirroring the doomed shallowness of mainstream society....

I think some dude named Bret Easton Ellis scooped Adbusters on this.  Like, in the 1980s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youth subculture mirroring the doomed shallowness of mainstream society&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think some dude named Bret Easton Ellis scooped Adbusters on this.  Like, in the 1980s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222966</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222966</guid>
		<description>I also associate myself with #3.

(And yes, I'm aware that I am leaving myself open to a plethora of scatological jokes with that statement. But so be it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also associate myself with #3.</p>
<p>(And yes, I&#8217;m aware that I am leaving myself open to a plethora of scatological jokes with that statement. But so be it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222960</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222960</guid>
		<description>I agree with Reid, #3.  No chance I could have put it better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Reid, #3.  No chance I could have put it better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222839</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222839</guid>
		<description>From the article:

"While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the &#8220;hipster&#8221; - a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society."

This is a huge exercise in circular logic. If you set out to examine the superficialities of people, you're going to inevitably conclude that people are superficial.

He's also falling for the old facile canard that you can define a whole group of people as a "generation".

This guy sound's like a premium douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the &#8220;hipster&#8221; - a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a huge exercise in circular logic. If you set out to examine the superficialities of people, you&#8217;re going to inevitably conclude that people are superficial.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s also falling for the old facile canard that you can define a whole group of people as a &#8220;generation&#8221;.</p>
<p>This guy sound&#8217;s like a premium douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saxon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222761</link>
		<dc:creator>Saxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222761</guid>
		<description>Having lived in Portland Or for the last four years...prepare to be disappointed. We all look good there but no Portland party or club has ever touched the fun found that can be still be found in LA or NYC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having lived in Portland Or for the last four years&#8230;prepare to be disappointed. We all look good there but no Portland party or club has ever touched the fun found that can be still be found in LA or NYC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolas Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/08/07/adbusters-hates-on-hipsters/#comment-222669</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolas Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/?p=6262#comment-222669</guid>
		<description>Angela, I &lt;a href="http://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/07/28/1445/" rel="nofollow"&gt;transcribed&lt;/a&gt; the article a couple days before it was published on-line.  Adbusters doesn't always put their articles on-line and I enjoyed it enough to spend an hour on it.  Anyways, I am glad you posted the link to this article, but by only copying the lead paragraph I don't think you got the full gist of the article.  While I believe the author had a somewhat limited scope in his characterization of Hipsterdom by only going out to a couple parties in Vancouver, I think much of his critique was spot on.  The best part is that a significant portion of Adbusters readers, who support the ad-free magazine by their donations, could easily be defined as hipsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela, I <a href="http://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/07/28/1445/" rel="nofollow">transcribed</a> the article a couple days before it was published on-line.  Adbusters doesn&#8217;t always put their articles on-line and I enjoyed it enough to spend an hour on it.  Anyways, I am glad you posted the link to this article, but by only copying the lead paragraph I don&#8217;t think you got the full gist of the article.  While I believe the author had a somewhat limited scope in his characterization of Hipsterdom by only going out to a couple parties in Vancouver, I think much of his critique was spot on.  The best part is that a significant portion of Adbusters readers, who support the ad-free magazine by their donations, could easily be defined as hipsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
