City Desk

Hey Post.com: Where are my toenails?

This morning a City Paper staffer walked into my office ridiculing this morning's WaPo Metro feature about toenails. He said it looked like a lame story, typical empty daily feature fare.

I'd read it at breakfast and liked it quite a bit. What I liked more than the story itself was the amazing photo presentation by Sarah L. Voisin. NEVER before has the front of Metro looked so inviting, mold-breaking, and all that other good stuff that design experts talk about at journalism conventions. Whereas the old and tired convention with a toenail-painting story would have been to take a shot or two of a woman getting the nails painted, Voisin, here, just took tons of pictures of painted toenails, and the layout people arranged them like a lei around the story text. It was stunningly good.

But not on the Web, goddamnit! I just spent a good ten minutes on the Post site trying to find the story. Nowhere on the homepage, so I went into the Metro page; I clicked through twice on the Metro "more stories" thingie before giving up. I refused to do a search, because a visual treatment that good shouldn't have to be fetched online. I also refused to click on the "Day in Photos" box because it fronted a shot of gray horses, not my toenails.

I mean, when you have two boxes on the homepage dedicated to Wall*E and nothing to original content as good as the toenails, someone's gotta be pissed, even if it's just me.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Comments

  1. #1

    In a stunning turn of events, I'm going to have to agree with Wemple on this one. I find it frustrating to often times read something in the print version of the paper that I would then like to email to someone later in the day and it's often difficult to find them on the web site without doing an archives search....

Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.