News & Featuresblogs
City Desk

The High Court and the D-Word

A brief perusal of Roget’s suggests a galaxy of promising adjectives for describing one’s reaction to a troubling Supreme Court decision.

For one, there is “troubled.” “Shocked,” “outraged,” and “concerned” come to mind. Further options include “chagrined,” “mortified,” “aggrieved,” “offended,” “incensed,” “riled up,” and “scared shitless.”

In their press releases, however, District politicos have been sticking to one word with alarming regularity:

Disappointed.

First, there is Ward 5 Councilmember Harry “Tommy” Thomas, Jr., who “expressed his extreme disappointment with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the District gun ban, and indicated that the Council must now establish strict standards to regulate the sale of handguns in the District of Columbia.”

Then we have Fenty, Nickles, and Lanier, who weigh in as follows:

Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, Interim Attorney General Peter Nickles, and Metropolitan Police Chief Cathy Lanier announced their disappointment in today’s ruling of the United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller…. “I’m disappointed in the Court’s ruling and believe introducing more handguns into the District will mean more handgun violence,” said Mayor Fenty.*

Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray includes the following in his statement:

Although I am disappointed by the court’s decision, working collectively with the Mayor, the Metropolitan Police, legal authorities, and residents, the Council will do all it can to prevent violence from escalating further as a result of today’s un-welcome weakening of our gun laws.

Ward 4 Councilmember Muriel Bowser:

I am disappointed in today’s Supreme Court action which ruled that the DC law banning private handgun possession at home violates the Second Amendment.

At-Large Councilmember Kwame Brown:

My disappointment in the Supreme Courts ruling cannot be merely expressed by words. Every time I hear of another youth, another mother or child gunned down in our communities is yet another reminder of why we need these protective measures in place.

[Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton issued a statement in which the d-word was conspicuously absent, as did Adam Clampitt, Independent Candidate for DC Council At-Large.]

Come on, folks! Disappointed is when your team loses in spring training. Disappointed is when your kid doesn’t crack a B in algebra. Disappointed is when your dog relieves himself under the dining room table.

Whatever happened to “I’m mad as hell and I’m not gonna take it anymore!”

*The Post imputes “dismay” to Fenty. Over-editorialize much lately?

6 Responses to “The High Court and the D-Word”

  1. Amanda Hess Says:

    I was going to say, “dismayed” ought to be the D-word this time around.

  2. HoyaParanoia Says:

    criticism of supreme court decisions by elected officials is always a tricky game … the only reason the Court has the power of judicial review is because the Court itself granted it and the other branches of government went along for the ride … therefore, there’s always the threat of another branch of government simply not following the Court’s decision (this was openly speculated about during the end of Nixon’s tenure)

    because of this, most rational politicians who criticize a specific Court decision (especially right after its released) do it in muted tones and generally while acknowledging that they’re going to follow the decision … fightin words are just bad form

  3. Mike Licht Says:

    Thanks to TV, the world is now aware that AG Nickles doesn’t know the difference between automatic and semiautomatic weapons. What ever happened to those other attorneys who were on this case — you know, the smart ones, the ones Nickles fired?

    I guess Mr. Nickles didn’t want to share credit for this stunning victory.

  4. urbane explorer Says:

    i’m AS mad as hell.

    you forgot the extra “as”. oh it maddens me so!

  5. Copy editor? Says:

    It’s Harry THOMAS, Jr., not Harry Thompson, Jr.

  6. Ted Scheinman Says:

    Fixed now. Thanks, Copy editor(?!), and sorry for the mix-up. Don’t drink and blog.

Leave a Reply

DC SEARCH
calendar
restaurants
movies
classified
personals

Find an Event

Enter a keyword, select the type of event, and the particular day this week below.

Submit your event to the City Paper's Event Calendar.

Find a Restaurant

Enter a restaurant name, or select a cuisine and neighborhood below.

Find a Movie

Select a movie theater in the box below to see a list of all movies at that theater.

...Or view a full list of theaters, films, and showtimes.

Search Classified Ads

Post a Classified Ad

Find It

Find a Match

Age range: to
Find It

Who saw you? Check I Saw You
Looking for something kinky? Wild Side

City Paper Newsletter
advertisement

CP Events

Can I have seconds?

This Week

Current Issue
The Issue of Sep. 5 - 11, 2008

This Week in
City Paper History

  • WILLIAMS EYEING HISTORY
    Aug. 28 - Sep. 3, 1998
  • The Big Takeover
    The Frodus conglomerate builds a Fairfax empire out of pancakes, bikini briefs, and hardcore irony.
    Aug. 29 - Sep. 4, 1997
  • Dicked Over
    Penile implants were sold as a safe cure for impotence, but a D.C. lawyer says the manufacturer gave his clients the shaft.
    Aug. 29 - Sep. 4, 1997
advertisement
advertisement