Downie Talks About Departure
The news that Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. gave to his newsroom just a half-hour ago barely qualifies as news at this point. As has been suggested, intimated, reported, and gossiped about for months, Downie is stepping down from his post.
The timeline, however, is something of a shocker: Downie will vacate his post effective Sept. 8, at which time the new executive editor will take over. Downie was to announce to his staff today that Washington Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth would announce his successor "soon." No telling whether that announcement would come before the 4th of July holiday or after. Conventional wisdom within the newsroom has long held that the changeover would never occur before the fall elections. Downie says that the break between the conventions, which he'll attend, and the fall campaign provides a convenient time for the transition.
The move, says Downie, "was a mutually agreed thing" between himself and Weymouth. When asked whether his opinions are weighing on the search for a new top editor, Downie replied, "In all things dealing with the present and future of the newsroom, Katharine and I have worked closely together and I’ve enjoyed the relationship."
Like his predecessor, the legendary executive editor Ben Bradlee, Downie, 66, will move into something of an emeritus position at the paper, with the title of Vice President, At-Large. The position is unpaid, says Downie, but comes with an office and other perks. He'll keep his assistant of more than 20 years, Patricia O'Shea, who figures among the paper's most beloved workers.
OK, but what's he going to do?
A lot, if you take his word for it. First comes his novel, The Rules of the Game, which will be published in January. He's also got another novel "in mind" and is pondering a nonfiction tome of some sort--probably a memoir about his times at the Post. Teaching and researching, too: Downie says that he wants to explore opportunities in academe. "I will try to do whatever seems feasible and reasonable in a less-than-full-time job of seeing the news media through this transition," he says. That's a strange role for someone who's leaving his job to let a younger leader do the same thing at the Post, but hey.
In his 17 years helming the Post, Downie has hauled in 25 Pulitzer Prizes, an astonishing tally considering that the paper, over more than a century, has a total of 47. Yet when asked what his biggest accomplishment is, Downie goes straight for sort of vanilla-flavor quote that he's been giving to media reporters for decades: "The newspaper has grown in its content and its relationship with its readers on the Web as well as in print. It is really a leader in accountability journalism," he says.
Of the Pulitzers, Downie is particularly proud of the three Post projects that won the lofty public-service awards: A series on the D.C. police department's record of shooting people; a series on the D.C. government's management of group homes for the mentally retarded; and last year's series on the treatment of soldiers and Marines at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. In all three cases, says Downie, the stories brought about change in their respective spheres.
Downie started at the Post 44 years ago yesterday--in other words, long enough to see a lot of things go right and wrong. He looked on, for example, as the paper, under Bradlee, published Janet Cooke's fabricated story about a boy living in the District.
Unless something goes terribly wrong over the summer, Downie will take off with a record unblemished by such scandal--a feat more stunning than his Pulitzer count. While the New York Times was sliming itself with scandals and misguided coverage ranging from the Jayson Blair fabrications to the Wen Ho Lee coverage to the John McCain-has-a-close-friend-who's-a-lobbyist embarrassment, the Post was motoring along with a bulletproof news report, day in, day out.
The biggest embarrassment that I can recall from the Downie years was when the Metro page reported that a 7-year-old girl had driven her unconscious father to the emergency room. In fact, she hadn't. That happened about 10 years ago.
The critics may say that Downie ran a boring paper fixated on federal wonkdom; that he never quite got Style; that he didn't innovate on the Web; that his paper wasn't flashy enough. But try running a newsroom of 800 or 900 journalists for 17 years without bringing shame on the profession. In a profession where it's so easy to err, that's a towering achievement.
Comments
Leave a Reply
You can follow any responses to this entry through its comments RSS feed.








5:36 pm
my memory of the bogus tale of the 7-year- old driver is vague, but, given the aftermath, i can't think of a story as shameful to the paper or the profession as the Jessica Lynch fiction reported by the Washington Post's Susan Schmidt and Vernon Loeb in 2003.
who gets credit for that?
5:50 pm
Who gets credit for the first classless posting here? Why it's Dave McKenna of the City Paper, who was treated badly by The Post years ago. Waaah.
As Wemple correctly points out, The Post and Downie have done a remarkable job of producing quality journalism, en masse, for the last 17 years. An occasional screwup is mathematically likely. Constant excellence deserves some credit. Not some whining about one lousy story, which was written by every news outlet in the country.
6:29 pm
Hondo:
I've been "treated badly" by the Post? where do you get that? i've been treated fabulously by the Post for a long time.
i think a lot of people agree with you that the Post's Jessica Lynch story, which was repeated, but not written, by every news outlet in the country, was no big deal. but i don't.
i am, however, envious of your name.
thanks for playing the feud!
7:09 pm
hey hondo howard, who signs your paychecks? i think you're on the wrong side of quality versus quantity. jessica lynch wasn't a spelling mistake or a clarification. it was f-i-c-t-i-o-n. a hair shy of janet cooke. at least janet made up her own story and didn't just belch out what was fed to her.
10:48 am
no editor is perfect. despite working in the toy department -- sports -- of the washington post for a few years, i got a taste of downie. in my experience he was extremely fair, passionate and inspiring. and there were a couple times that he mentioned a specific line in what i thought was a throw-away story. it certainly seemed to indicate that he read virtually everything. not that the pulitzer prize affirms an editor's impact. but it offers a hint that downie's been the best newspaper editor anywhere during a turbulent time for the industry.
3:33 pm
I could have sworn that I once read a piece by Dave McKenna in which he related that Tony Kornheiser had abused Ken Beatrice, that Dave wrote about that, and that the Post sports section then kicked Dave off their stringer list. I wouldn't say that was fabulous treatment. In fact, I'd say it was wrong, judging by the excellent music reviews he writes for the Style section.
The Jessica Lynch story was a bad deal, no doubt. I was just saying there were plenty of good things Downie did too.
Now, can I have "WaPo Hatas" for 200?