<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alt-Weekly Readership Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-172357</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-172357</guid>
		<description>If you look at the link again- it doesnt say the onion has more readers than the city paper, just that the onion has a larger circulation - about double city papers.

The onions a waste of paper- they should just stick to online. The boxes are always full which leads me to think of all the trees that were cut down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the link again- it doesnt say the onion has more readers than the city paper, just that the onion has a larger circulation - about double city papers.</p>
<p>The onions a waste of paper- they should just stick to online. The boxes are always full which leads me to think of all the trees that were cut down...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jule Banville</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jule Banville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171929</guid>
		<description>Aww, Cherkis. You&#039;re so cute when you&#039;re hypocritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, Cherkis. You're so cute when you're hypocritical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara.h</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171926</link>
		<dc:creator>sara.h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171926</guid>
		<description>i bet the Onion&#039;s website lets its commenters have accounts. 

(actually, i don&#039;t think you can comment on the onion at all)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet the Onion's website lets its commenters have accounts. </p>
<p>(actually, i don't think you can comment on the onion at all)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WAM</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171925</link>
		<dc:creator>WAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171925</guid>
		<description>And hire Eaton back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And hire Eaton back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WAM</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171924</link>
		<dc:creator>WAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171924</guid>
		<description>I think we should recruit local bloggers from each of the suburbs. Call it Burb Desk. Get some folks on the suburban weather beat. Tornados! Earthquakes! Derailments! Well, the last one is not exactly weather. What do I know, though. while(*i++ = *j++); That&#039;s all I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should recruit local bloggers from each of the suburbs. Call it Burb Desk. Get some folks on the suburban weather beat. Tornados! Earthquakes! Derailments! Well, the last one is not exactly weather. What do I know, though. while(*i++ = *j++); That's all I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171901</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171901</guid>
		<description>yeah, we are a Media Audit client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, we are a Media Audit client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Athitakis</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Athitakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171885</guid>
		<description>One of the commenters to that post suggests that the numbers were crunched only with publications that are clients of the Media Audit. (Is WCP a client of the Media Audit? No clue. I try to avoid things with the word &quot;audit&quot; in them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the commenters to that post suggests that the numbers were crunched only with publications that are clients of the Media Audit. (Is WCP a client of the Media Audit? No clue. I try to avoid things with the word "audit" in them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Licht</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Licht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171881</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s true that the Onion gets more readers than City Paper in DC, that&#039;s the real concern.

On the other hand, the back of the cereal box has more readers than WaPo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it's true that the Onion gets more readers than City Paper in DC, that's the real concern.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the back of the cereal box has more readers than WaPo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eaton</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171880</link>
		<dc:creator>Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171880</guid>
		<description>Yes Bmore is a D.C. suburb. And yes, please hire me back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Bmore is a D.C. suburb. And yes, please hire me back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cherkis</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-171861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/06/11/alt-weekly-readership-up/#comment-171861</guid>
		<description>Please hire Eaton back. Isn&#039;t Baltimore now a suburb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please hire Eaton back. Isn't Baltimore now a suburb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

