News & Featuresblogs
City Desk

Rhee: Why Fire Oyster Principal?

Is D.C. schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee nuts?

That’s the question I had after reading the account in yesterday’s Washington Post about her firing of Marta Guzman, the principal of Woodley Park’s Oyster-Adams Bilingual School. Rhee’s own two children attend the school.

And based on the report by the Post’s Bill Turque, Rhee had an awfully weak explanation for parents who wondered why she’d fired Guzman. Here’s Rhee’s side of the story:

Rhee said that as a parent “in the school three days a week,” and with information from her own staff, she had a broad base of opinion to draw on. She said a major concern she had, for example, was that while the “English dominant” students, such as her daughters, were learning Spanish, they were “not truly bilingual in the way we would want.” For that to happen, bilingualism needed to be more deeply embedded into all moments of the school day.

So I’m thinking–Rhee’s daughters aren’t yet running around the house using the imperfect subjunctive to perfection, and so Rhee fires their principal. Now, I am not an Oyster parent and haven’t done a lick of reporting on this matter, nor will I. But I do want to state one thing: No new principal is going to come in, snap some fingers, and make bilingualism more deeply embedded into all moments of the school day. Kids speak their dominant language, and if that language is English, they’re going to be speaking English in the hallways, English in recess, English in the lunchroom and so on. Even some Spanish-dominant kids go through a phase when they reject the language they speak in the home and go with English.

So, Rhee: Good luck getting a principal who can reverse these tendencies.

8 Responses to “Rhee: Why Fire Oyster Principal?”

  1. Jay Raddy Says:

    Rhee is not qualified for the job she now holds. Previously she was the owner of a very small employment agency that placed teachers.

    hat do you expect from an incompetent?

  2. Jim Says:

    I’ve heard from teachers and parents that everyone was fed up with the principal who, by all accounts, was doing a terrible job. I don’t have kids in school there and I’ve never set foot in the school–I’m just passing on what I’ve been told.

  3. Don Says:

    A simple check of the No Child Left Behind scores- pretty much the easiest fact checking a reporter can do- would show the downward slide from previous Oyster principal… ummm… Paquita Holland? It was the original principal that made the school great. All parents would tell you that Oyster was losing out to schools like Murch and progessive up and comers like Bancroft’s Bilingual Arts Program. Rhee stopped the bleeding Erik Wemple, ye journalist of no research.

  4. DC Says:

    Oyster used to be located in a low income area with a lot of hispanic students. Now, the student body is dominated by non-hispanic kids from the very wealthy neighborhood families in Woodley, Cleveland Park, and Kalorama. Peoplelike Rhee and her $300,000 salary. So, why not give up the bilingual farce, and reallocate some of those bilingual ed dollars to actual neighborhoods with Latino children.

  5. Fister Says:

    Oyster used to be located in Woodley Park, a beautiful, historic neighborhood with stately row houses and 6 figure incomes. It still is. It also borders on Adams Morgan, and always has. The combination offers a unique opportunity for residents of both neighborhoods (and others if there are lottery spaces).

    It isn’t a bilingual farse, but it is a community that isn’t reaching its potential under the current leadership.

    Most parents at Oyster will tell you this was a good move.

  6. Maria Says:

    Marta Guzman has been at Oyster for at least 4 years, maybe longer. Hardly a “new principal” with “no time to snap her fingers.”

  7. Jaun Says:

    Commenter “DC” (#4), Oyster has always, and only, been located exactly where it is. In fact, the number of low income students has INCREASED as one can easily ascertain by the doubling of the number of children on subsidized lunch.

    You are spouting the disinformation that has followed the firing of a number of non performing principals. When the 15 year principal at our local school (Ross) was let go after years of declining results.

    Non performing administrators and principals like the low income parents. Why? Because they don’t complain or if they do they have no power to force change.

    The parents at Oyster were fed up. Including, if not especially, the Latino parents.

  8. Scott D Says:

    4 years is not a new principle. Guzman was not performing and was rightly fired. case closed.

Leave a Reply

CarTango
DC SEARCH
calendar
restaurants
movies
classified
personals

Find an Event

Enter a keyword, select the type of event, and the particular day this week below.

Submit your event to the City Paper's Event Calendar.

Find a Restaurant

Enter a restaurant name, or select a cuisine and neighborhood below.

Find a Movie

Select a movie theater in the box below to see a list of all movies at that theater.

...Or view a full list of theaters, films, and showtimes.

Search Classified Ads

Post a Classified Ad

Find It

Find a Match

Age range: to
Find It

Who saw you? Check I Saw You
Looking for something kinky? Wild Side

City Paper Newsletter
advertisement

Get a Car

Search inventory on the City Paper's CarTango website:

Free Stuff

CP Events

Find yours

This Week

Current Issue
The Issue of Oct. 10 - 16, 2008

This Week in
City Paper History

  • Angels Without Wings
    The D.C. Guardian Angels aspire to fight crime like comic-book superheroes. But are they more comic than hero?
    Oct. 2 - 8, 1998
  • Fare Elections
    Cabdriver aims for an African presidency.
    Oct. 3 - 9, 2003
  • Kicking and Screaming
    Soccer is supposed to be the beautiful game. In D.C.'s biggest youth-soccer league, it's turning ugly.
    Oct. 3 - 9, 2003
advertisement
advertisement