<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does ANC Stand for Annoyed Neighbors Complaining?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:58:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-154810</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-154810</guid>
		<description>I hope he said &quot;apathy&quot; not &quot;empathy&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he said "apathy" not "empathy"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fister</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-153630</link>
		<dc:creator>Fister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-153630</guid>
		<description>ANCs should simply be eliminated as they currently exist.  They are unpaid elected positions.  People who serve are generally either busybodies or have some self interest which gets them involved in the first place.

If the ANC position becomes a &quot;house&quot; to the Council&#039;s Senate, then there would need to be much fewer elected positions, and there would need to be some stipend or salary (even if it was say 20k a year) to go with it (Council members are paid over 100k for a part time position).  However that kind of money would demonstrate a largesse and an unnecessary bureaucratic layer to a city of 600,000 people.

Most DC Agencies ignore the great weight that ANC are supposed to have because many of their actions appear on agendas which are not well publicized or are altered at the beginning of a meeting to include controversial items.  One can look at ANCs throughout the city for different levels of financial or legislative abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANCs should simply be eliminated as they currently exist.  They are unpaid elected positions.  People who serve are generally either busybodies or have some self interest which gets them involved in the first place.</p>
<p>If the ANC position becomes a "house" to the Council's Senate, then there would need to be much fewer elected positions, and there would need to be some stipend or salary (even if it was say 20k a year) to go with it (Council members are paid over 100k for a part time position).  However that kind of money would demonstrate a largesse and an unnecessary bureaucratic layer to a city of 600,000 people.</p>
<p>Most DC Agencies ignore the great weight that ANC are supposed to have because many of their actions appear on agendas which are not well publicized or are altered at the beginning of a meeting to include controversial items.  One can look at ANCs throughout the city for different levels of financial or legislative abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Keemper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-153570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Keemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-153570</guid>
		<description>Can you imagine if the DC gov actually gave a crap.  ANC is a waste of time and everyone knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you imagine if the DC gov actually gave a crap.  ANC is a waste of time and everyone knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-153568</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-153568</guid>
		<description>I think an eventual answer may be to give the ANCs more authority and turn them into a sort of House of Delegates branch of the legislature.

As it is, the only power the ANCs have is through limited zoning authority and &quot;voluntary&quot; agreements. With this limited authority over these niggling issues, you&#039;re bound to end up attracting only people who feel like bitching about little niggling issues like speed bumps and the volume of a bar&#039;s music.

If however, the ANCs were like the House of Reps to the Council&#039;s Senate, they&#039;d attract a lot more attention.

Of course, they&#039;d have to improve significantly the way they handle themselves. But that&#039;s sort of a chicken and the egg problem, eh?

Along similar lines, I think some group once advised the council to expand the number of CMs. I believe most cities of DC&#039;s size have more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an eventual answer may be to give the ANCs more authority and turn them into a sort of House of Delegates branch of the legislature.</p>
<p>As it is, the only power the ANCs have is through limited zoning authority and "voluntary" agreements. With this limited authority over these niggling issues, you're bound to end up attracting only people who feel like bitching about little niggling issues like speed bumps and the volume of a bar's music.</p>
<p>If however, the ANCs were like the House of Reps to the Council's Senate, they'd attract a lot more attention.</p>
<p>Of course, they'd have to improve significantly the way they handle themselves. But that's sort of a chicken and the egg problem, eh?</p>
<p>Along similar lines, I think some group once advised the council to expand the number of CMs. I believe most cities of DC's size have more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike DeBonis</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-153554</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike DeBonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-153554</guid>
		<description>Some vintage CP reporting on the issue--&quot;Democracy Inaction&quot; by Ta-Nehisi Coates, May 29, 1998:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=15080</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some vintage CP reporting on the issue--"Democracy Inaction" by Ta-Nehisi Coates, May 29, 1998:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=15080" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=15080</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Layman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-153548</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/05/21/does-anc-stand-for-annoyed-neighbors-complaining/#comment-153548</guid>
		<description>There are many problems with ANCs, but the second biggest problem is that there is no significant training infrastructure to support civic engagement and deliberative processes for ANC commissioners and civic organizations.  Without it, you can guarantee that there is a lot of mucking about.

Another problem, no dedicated office and/or meeting space.  In other cities, neighborhood councils even get some quality staff assistance.

But the #1 problem is what I call governmentalizing how people conceive of problems and how they should be addressed.  What happens is that the idea of self organization, empowerment, and self help gets replaced with thinking that government is the solution to every issue.

But actually, there need to be more ANCs in some places.  E.g., in Ward 5, the ANCs are so big, they bring together SMDs from wildly disparate areas, when smaller ANCs could better focus on areas-issues of common concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many problems with ANCs, but the second biggest problem is that there is no significant training infrastructure to support civic engagement and deliberative processes for ANC commissioners and civic organizations.  Without it, you can guarantee that there is a lot of mucking about.</p>
<p>Another problem, no dedicated office and/or meeting space.  In other cities, neighborhood councils even get some quality staff assistance.</p>
<p>But the #1 problem is what I call governmentalizing how people conceive of problems and how they should be addressed.  What happens is that the idea of self organization, empowerment, and self help gets replaced with thinking that government is the solution to every issue.</p>
<p>But actually, there need to be more ANCs in some places.  E.g., in Ward 5, the ANCs are so big, they bring together SMDs from wildly disparate areas, when smaller ANCs could better focus on areas-issues of common concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
