<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: SIX Flagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/</link>
	<description>&#60;em&#62;City Paper&#60;/em&#62; Writers on News, Politics, the Media, the Arts, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave McKenna</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128243</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128243</guid>
		<description>Nameless:

pulling out "every bit of bad news" about Six Flags sounds like a great idea for a blog! but, geez, that would take a much larger staff. i mean, have you looked into the company lately? it's all chopped off feet and diarrhea, Nameless!

you do the Six Flags Good News blog, Nameless. You could do it in your sleep. Really...

But thanks for playing the feud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nameless:</p>
<p>pulling out &#8220;every bit of bad news&#8221; about Six Flags sounds like a great idea for a blog! but, geez, that would take a much larger staff. i mean, have you looked into the company lately? it&#8217;s all chopped off feet and diarrhea, Nameless!</p>
<p>you do the Six Flags Good News blog, Nameless. You could do it in your sleep. Really&#8230;</p>
<p>But thanks for playing the feud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nameless</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128240</link>
		<dc:creator>Nameless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128240</guid>
		<description>It seems very easy to pull out every bit of bad news. Is there a point to this blog if its just a Snyder hating rant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems very easy to pull out every bit of bad news. Is there a point to this blog if its just a Snyder hating rant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnyderSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128156</link>
		<dc:creator>SnyderSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128156</guid>
		<description>Yesterday almost ended at $1.53, if not for a 23k $1.56 share block right at the end. Will have to see how today ends.

From the latest Insider Transactions, they haven't sold off their shares. Schar increased his holdings by 1,112,000 shares between $1.96 and $2. 

With so much market cap lost, most shareholders are holding onto the stock as evidenced by the low trading volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday almost ended at $1.53, if not for a 23k $1.56 share block right at the end. Will have to see how today ends.</p>
<p>From the latest Insider Transactions, they haven&#8217;t sold off their shares. Schar increased his holdings by 1,112,000 shares between $1.96 and $2. </p>
<p>With so much market cap lost, most shareholders are holding onto the stock as evidenced by the low trading volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McKenna</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128153</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128153</guid>
		<description>SnyderSucks:

While $1.46 is the low for SIX, as has been written in City Desk several times, that was a mid-day price, and SIX closed on Jan. 22 at $1.63 a share. So, I'm still pretty sure that yesterday's mark is a record low for a closing price -- though from the looks of things it'll only hold the mark until the end of today's trading.

I've also written about the distribution of shares within Red Zone a few months back, which is why I said "assuming they've still got them." I have looked for, but not found, any disclosures that the biggies in Red Zone got rid of their SIX stock after the dispersal. 

Do you know differently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SnyderSucks:</p>
<p>While $1.46 is the low for SIX, as has been written in City Desk several times, that was a mid-day price, and SIX closed on Jan. 22 at $1.63 a share. So, I&#8217;m still pretty sure that yesterday&#8217;s mark is a record low for a closing price &#8212; though from the looks of things it&#8217;ll only hold the mark until the end of today&#8217;s trading.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also written about the distribution of shares within Red Zone a few months back, which is why I said &#8220;assuming they&#8217;ve still got them.&#8221; I have looked for, but not found, any disclosures that the biggies in Red Zone got rid of their SIX stock after the dispersal. </p>
<p>Do you know differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnyderSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128115</link>
		<dc:creator>SnyderSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/16/update-six-flagging-12/#comment-128115</guid>
		<description>The all-time low for Six was $1.46 reached on January 22, 2008. 

Red Zone, LLC no longer exists, reportedly because some of the shareholders wanted control of their shares. Snyder isn't the largest shareholder, Bill Gates personal investment firm Cascade Investment, LLC has the most shares now.

Six Flags is burdened by so many negative issues including the lawsuits you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The all-time low for Six was $1.46 reached on January 22, 2008. </p>
<p>Red Zone, LLC no longer exists, reportedly because some of the shareholders wanted control of their shares. Snyder isn&#8217;t the largest shareholder, Bill Gates personal investment firm Cascade Investment, LLC has the most shares now.</p>
<p>Six Flags is burdened by so many negative issues including the lawsuits you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
